flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Top 50 Science + Technology Engineering Firms

Top 50 Science + Technology Engineering Firms

Jacobs, Affiliated Engineers, and Vanderweil Engineers top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest science + technology sector engineering and EA firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.


By BD+C Staff | August 12, 2016

Georgia Institute of Technology, Engineered Biosystems Building, Atlanta, Ga. Cooper Carry (architect), McCarthy Building Companies (GC), Newcomb & Boyd (MEP), Long Engineering (CE). Photo: Chris Cooper courtesy of Cooper Carry.

TOP 50 SCIENCE + TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING FIRMS
Rank Firm 2015 Revenue
1 Jacobs $51,420,000
2 Affiliated Engineers $29,447,000
3 Vanderweil Engineers $21,653,900
4 CRB $10,200,000
5 RMF Engineering $6,285,000
6 Mazzetti $5,199,075
7 Thornton Tomasetti $4,686,534
8 Newcomb & Boyd $3,466,430
9 Rist-Frost-Shumway Engineering $3,335,000
10 Global Engineering Solutions $3,275,000
11 BR+A Consulting Engineers $3,000,000
12 Arup $2,352,966
13 Ghafari Associates $2,000,000
14 BSA LifeStructures $1,969,607
15 Syska Hennessy Group $1,750,876
16 Bridgers & Paxton Consulting Engineers $1,667,247
17 Environmental Systems Design $1,571,840
18 Jensen Hughes $1,555,972
19 STV $1,378,299
20 KJWW / TTG $1,365,000
21 RDK Engineers $1,323,231
22 Spectrum Engineers $1,288,746
23 Ross & Baruzzini $1,284,549
24 ThermalTech Engineering $1,250,000
25 Hankins and Anderson $1,230,980
26 Karpinski Engineering $1,100,000
27 Sherlock, Smith & Adams $1,014,000
28 ME Engineers $1,000,000
29 Cardno Haynes Whaley $820,511
30 Pedco E & A Services $765,000
31 Coffman Engineers $698,634
32 I. C. Thomasson Associates $622,000
33 Smith Seckman Reid $511,913
34 P2S Engineering $504,514
35 Glumac $494,360
36 Peter Basso Associates $474,636
37 Bala Consulting Engineers $450,000
38 SSOE Group $390,000
39 dbHMS $384,000
40 Henderson Engineers $326,842
41 William Tao & Associates $315,389
42 Walter P Moore $315,202
43 Stanley Consultants $290,773
44 Highland Associates $220,000
45 KZF Design $216,000
46 JBA Consulting Engineers $131,855
47 H.F. Lenz Company $131,000
48 Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates $100,000
49 CTLGroup $100,000
50 Architectural Engineers $79,964
51 G & W Engineering Corp. $50,013
52 Dunham Associates $50,000

 

RETURN TO THE GIANTS 300 LANDING PAGE

Related Stories

| May 31, 2012

Product Solutions June 2012

Curing agents; commercial faucets; wall-cladding systems.

| May 31, 2012

8 steps to a successful BIM marketing program

It's not enough to have BIM capability--you have to know how to sell your BIM expertise to clients and prospects.

| May 31, 2012

3 Metal Roofing Case Studies Illustrate Benefits

Metal roofing systems offer values such as longevity, favorable life cycle costs, and heightened aesthetic appeal.

| May 31, 2012

AIA Course: High-Efficiency Plumbing Systems for Commercial and Institutional Buildings

Earn 1.0 AIA/CES learning units by studying this article and successfully completing the online exam.

| May 31, 2012

2011 Reconstruction Award Profile: Seegers Student Union at Muhlenberg College

Seegers Student Union at Muhlenberg College has been reconstructed to serve as the core of social life on campus.

| May 31, 2012

2011 Reconstruction Awards Profile: Ka Makani Community Center

An abandoned historic structure gains a new life as the focal point of a legendary military district in Hawaii.

| May 31, 2012

5 military construction trends

Defense spending may be down somewhat, but there’s still plenty of project dollars out there if you know where to look.

| May 31, 2012

New School’s University Center in NYC topped out

16-story will provide new focal point for campus.

| May 31, 2012

Day & Zimmermann taps Jobe for ECM VP

Ken Jobe, a senior executive with 30+ years of industry-related experience, joins Day & Zimmermann to expand footprint in the process & industrial markets.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category



Resiliency

U.S. is reducing floodplain development in most areas

The perception that the U.S. has not been able to curb development in flood-prone areas is mostly inaccurate, according to new research from climate adaptation experts. A national survey of floodplain development between 2001 and 2019 found that fewer structures were built in floodplains than might be expected if cities were building at random.


halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021