Despite their planning and risk management efforts, owners are still finding that a sizable percentage of their projects are either failing or aren’t coming in anywhere near on time or on budget.
More than half—53%—of owners say they suffered one or more underperforming projects in the previous year, a number that rises to 61% for larger organizations, according to KPMG International’s ninth annual Global Construction Survey 2015, based on interviews with 109 senior leaders from private and public organizations around the world that conduct construction activity.
Only 31% of respondents’ projects over the past three years came in within 10% of their budgeted cost. And only one quarter of projects over that period came in within 10% of their original deadlines.
The owners imply that these failures, delays, and overruns are less the result of poor project oversight than of talent shortages and the lack of integration of project management information systems into these companies’ accounting and procurement software programs.
Most owners polled assert that their companies use formal screening, prioritizing, and approval processes for projects, including financial and risk analysis (84%). More than 80% of respondents state that the majority of their capital projects are planned. Thirty percent of respondents use a design-bid-build project delivery strategy, while 32% use engineer-procure-construct.
“All potential projects should be systematically identified, classified, screened, prioritized, evaluated and selected,” writes Jeff Shaw, Director-KPMG in South Africa. “This process must be supported by an appropriate budget allocation and monitoring process. Throughout the capital allocation process, alignment between strategic objectives and the capital project portfolio must be tested.”
The report notes, however, that owners are challenged finding qualified project management personnel. Forty-five percent of respondents say they struggle to attract qualified craft labor, planners and project management professionals.
While 64% of respondents believe their management controls are either “optimized” or “monitored,” nearly one-third concede that their controls are “standardized,” with no testing or reporting or reporting to management and only limited staff training.
Most construction companies rely heavily on software to manage projects. Fifty-five percent of respondents say they are “satisfied” or “mostly satisfied” about the return on investment from project management tools and training. And 73% say they are confident about the accuracy and timeliness of reports they receive from managers and contractors.
However, only about half of respondents say their organizations have introduced an integrated project management information system (PMIS). Consequently, less than one-fifth of respondents could answer “yes” definitively when asked if investments in project governance and controls have reduced project costs.
In planning for delays and cost overruns, senior executives polled identify a range of methods to calculate contingency levels. The two most popular are setting aside an specific amount of contingency for all projects (e.g., 10%), and quantitative risk analysis. “The relative sophistication of the latter suggests that owners are trying to become more accurate in their forecasting,” the report states.
Sixty-nine percent of owners polled say that “poor contractor performance” is one of the biggest reasons for failing projects, delays, or cost overruns. And there’s definitely something negative going when only one-third could say they have a “high” level of trust with pros.
More than eight in 10 respondents expect greater collaboration with contractors over the next five years. How much these relationships actually change, though, remains to be seen. The report suggests that lump-sum, fixed-price contracts, which dominate among the survey’s respondents, are one reason for the fragile state of owner-contractor relationships, primarily because they defer risk onto the contractor. And owners believe the balance of power is shifting toward them; nearly half expect to have more negotiating strength when delivering capital projects over the next five years.
KPMG International offers five steps for owners to improve the performance of their projects:
- Take a fresh approach to talent management through more effective recruitment, development, and retention strategies;
- Execute a fully integrated PMIS for swift coordination and real-time reporting;
- Demand practical targets from contractors based on realistic expectations of what can go wrong;
- Use contingency planning to control costs rather than excuse overruns; and
- Invest in relationships with contractors by creating integrated project teams.
Related Stories
Contractors | May 25, 2021
Doug Woods, DPR Construction's cofounder, dead at 70
His management style stressed collaboration that can tackle complex projects.
Digital Twin | May 24, 2021
Digital twin’s value propositions for the built environment, explained
Ernst & Young’s white paper makes its cases for the technology’s myriad benefits.
Contractors | May 20, 2021
Balfour Beatty’s outreach to veterans pays dividends in leadership and growth
Contracts for work it’s done for the San Diego Unified School District have extended to several disabled vet-owned businesses.
Senior Living Design | May 19, 2021
Senior living design: Post-COVID trends and innovations
Two senior living design experts discuss the latest trends and innovations in the senior living building sector.
Multifamily Housing | May 18, 2021
Multifamily housing sector sees near record proposal activity in early 2021
The multifamily sector led all housing submarkets, and was third among all 58 submarkets tracked by PSMJ in the first quarter of 2021.
Wood | May 14, 2021
What's next for mass timber design?
An architect who has worked on some of the nation's largest and most significant mass timber construction projects shares his thoughts on the latest design trends and innovations in mass timber.
Healthcare Facilities | Apr 30, 2021
Registration and waiting: Weak points and an enduring strength
Changing how patients register and wait for appointments will enhance the healthcare industry’s ability to respond to crises.
University Buildings | Apr 29, 2021
The Weekly Show, April 29, 2021: COVID-19's impact on campus planning, and bird management strategies
This week on The Weekly show, BD+C Senior Editor John Caulfield interviews a duo of industry experts on 1) how campus planning has changed during the pandemic and 2) managing bird infestations on construction sites and completed buildings.
Multifamily Housing | Apr 22, 2021
The Weekly Show, Apr 22, 2021: COVID-19's impact on multifamily amenities
This week on The Weekly show, BD+C's Robert Cassidy speaks with three multifamily design experts about the impact of COVID-19 on apartment and condo amenities, based on the 2021 Multifamily Amenities Survey.