Despite their planning and risk management efforts, owners are still finding that a sizable percentage of their projects are either failing or aren’t coming in anywhere near on time or on budget.
More than half—53%—of owners say they suffered one or more underperforming projects in the previous year, a number that rises to 61% for larger organizations, according to KPMG International’s ninth annual Global Construction Survey 2015, based on interviews with 109 senior leaders from private and public organizations around the world that conduct construction activity.
Only 31% of respondents’ projects over the past three years came in within 10% of their budgeted cost. And only one quarter of projects over that period came in within 10% of their original deadlines.
The owners imply that these failures, delays, and overruns are less the result of poor project oversight than of talent shortages and the lack of integration of project management information systems into these companies’ accounting and procurement software programs.
Most owners polled assert that their companies use formal screening, prioritizing, and approval processes for projects, including financial and risk analysis (84%). More than 80% of respondents state that the majority of their capital projects are planned. Thirty percent of respondents use a design-bid-build project delivery strategy, while 32% use engineer-procure-construct.
“All potential projects should be systematically identified, classified, screened, prioritized, evaluated and selected,” writes Jeff Shaw, Director-KPMG in South Africa. “This process must be supported by an appropriate budget allocation and monitoring process. Throughout the capital allocation process, alignment between strategic objectives and the capital project portfolio must be tested.”
The report notes, however, that owners are challenged finding qualified project management personnel. Forty-five percent of respondents say they struggle to attract qualified craft labor, planners and project management professionals.
While 64% of respondents believe their management controls are either “optimized” or “monitored,” nearly one-third concede that their controls are “standardized,” with no testing or reporting or reporting to management and only limited staff training.
Most construction companies rely heavily on software to manage projects. Fifty-five percent of respondents say they are “satisfied” or “mostly satisfied” about the return on investment from project management tools and training. And 73% say they are confident about the accuracy and timeliness of reports they receive from managers and contractors.
However, only about half of respondents say their organizations have introduced an integrated project management information system (PMIS). Consequently, less than one-fifth of respondents could answer “yes” definitively when asked if investments in project governance and controls have reduced project costs.
In planning for delays and cost overruns, senior executives polled identify a range of methods to calculate contingency levels. The two most popular are setting aside an specific amount of contingency for all projects (e.g., 10%), and quantitative risk analysis. “The relative sophistication of the latter suggests that owners are trying to become more accurate in their forecasting,” the report states.
Sixty-nine percent of owners polled say that “poor contractor performance” is one of the biggest reasons for failing projects, delays, or cost overruns. And there’s definitely something negative going when only one-third could say they have a “high” level of trust with pros.
More than eight in 10 respondents expect greater collaboration with contractors over the next five years. How much these relationships actually change, though, remains to be seen. The report suggests that lump-sum, fixed-price contracts, which dominate among the survey’s respondents, are one reason for the fragile state of owner-contractor relationships, primarily because they defer risk onto the contractor. And owners believe the balance of power is shifting toward them; nearly half expect to have more negotiating strength when delivering capital projects over the next five years.
KPMG International offers five steps for owners to improve the performance of their projects:
- Take a fresh approach to talent management through more effective recruitment, development, and retention strategies;
- Execute a fully integrated PMIS for swift coordination and real-time reporting;
- Demand practical targets from contractors based on realistic expectations of what can go wrong;
- Use contingency planning to control costs rather than excuse overruns; and
- Invest in relationships with contractors by creating integrated project teams.
Related Stories
Building Team | Jun 22, 2022
Design for new San Clemente Marine Safety Headquarters would create new public plaza
A proposed design by HMC Architects for a new San Clemente Marine Safety Headquarters makes creative use of the seaside topography of the Pacific Coast.
Augmented Reality | Jun 22, 2022
Not just for POKÉMON GO anymore: how augmented reality is transforming architecture
By solving a long-standing communication problem, Augmented Reality (AR) is poised to make architecture quicker, nimbler, and more cost effective.
Healthcare Facilities | Jun 22, 2022
Arizona State University’s Health Futures Center: A new home for medical tech innovation
In Phoenix, the Arizona State University (ASU) has constructed its Health Futures Center—expanding the school’s impact as a research institution emphasizing medical technology acceleration and innovation, entrepreneurship, and healthcare education.
Market Data | Jun 22, 2022
Architecture Billings Index slows but remains strong
Architecture firms reported increasing demand for design services in May, according to a new report today from The American Institute of Architects (AIA).
Green | Jun 22, 2022
World’s largest commercial Living Building opens in Portland, Ore.
The world’s largest commercial Living Building recently opened in Portland, Ore.
Multifamily Housing | Jun 21, 2022
Two birds, one solution: Can we solve urban last-mile distribution and housing challenges at the same time?
When it comes to the development of both multifamily housing and last-mile distribution centers, particularly in metropolitan environments, each presents its own series of challenges and hurdles. One solution: single-use structures.
Libraries | Jun 21, 2022
Kingston, Ontario, library branch renovation cuts energy use to 55% of benchmark
A recent renovation of the Kingston (Ontario) Frontenac Public Library Central Branch greatly boosted energy and water efficiency while making the facility healthier and safer.
Building Materials | Jun 20, 2022
Early-stage procurement: The next evolution of the construction supply chain
Austin Commercial’s Jason Earnhardt explains why supply chain issues for the construction industry are not going to go away and how developers and owners can get ahead of project roadblocks.
Healthcare Facilities | Jun 20, 2022
Is telehealth finally mainstream?
After more than a century of development, telehealth has become a standard alternative for many types of care.
Building Team | Jun 20, 2022
Andres Caballero Appointed President of Uponor North America
Uponor Corporation (Uponor) has named Andres Caballero president of its Building Solutions – North America division and a member of the Executive Committee at Uponor.
