flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Three Texas cities head list of most environmentally vulnerable

Codes and Standards

Three Texas cities head list of most environmentally vulnerable

Hazard analysis includes natural disasters and government response categories.


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | August 17, 2021

Courtesy Pixabay

Three Texas cities lead YardiMatrix’s list of U.S. metro areas with the most environmental risk.

Houston, Austin, and Dallas all received low scores in the firm’s recent ESG report, in the categories of “natural disasters” and “government response.” The analysis included the February 2021 winter storms that claimed 150 lives statewide, and yielded power, food, and water shortages, affecting more than 4.5 million residents. Property damages exceeded $20 billion because of the freakish winter weather.

After the three Texas cities, Tampa and Los Angeles were next on the list of the riskiest U.S. metros. Four cities had the least environmental risk: Boston, Indianapolis, Minneapolis, and Portland. The least risky cities were in states that are taking environmental risk seriously.

Concerns about financial firms’ ability to assess environmental risk has spawned a new industry of consultants that analyze environmental data examine the impact on markets and individual buildings. This field will acquire better data and metrics as it matures, the report says.

Related Stories

| Sep 1, 2011

Project Aims to Automate Code Compliance Assessment

FIATECH, a consortium of owners from the industrial, power, and retail markets that build large structures, launched a project this year to validate the use of automation technology for code compliance assessment, and to accelerate the regulatory approval process using building models. Long-term objectives include the development of an extensive, open-source rule set library that is approved by industry and regulatory bodies for use by technology developers and code officials.

| Sep 1, 2011

EPA Says Additional Lead Paint Cleaning Rules Not Necessary

The EPA has concluded that current Lead: Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program (LRRP) cleaning requirements and lead-safe work regulations are sufficient to protect the public from lead dust hazards. “Our members have been instrumental in contacting legislators to detail the detrimental impact of the current LRRP," says Richard Walker, American Architectural Manufacturers Association’s president and CEO. “This collective industry voice has prompted the EPA to make the responsible decision to refrain from adding further, unnecessary costs to homeowners under the current economic climate."http://www.aamanet.org/news/1/10/0/all/603/aama-commends-its-members-congress-for-vacating-lrrp-clearance-rule

| Aug 11, 2010

Best AEC Firms of 2011/12

Later this year, we will launch Best AEC Firms 2012. We’re looking for firms that create truly positive workplaces for their AEC professionals and support staff. Keep an eye on this page for entry information. +

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category


Resiliency

U.S. is reducing floodplain development in most areas

The perception that the U.S. has not been able to curb development in flood-prone areas is mostly inaccurate, according to new research from climate adaptation experts. A national survey of floodplain development between 2001 and 2019 found that fewer structures were built in floodplains than might be expected if cities were building at random.



halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021

Â