In the “Glass Box Paradox,” Paladino and Company contend that there is a causal relationship between the performance of the façade of One Bryant Park (OBP) and the building’s overall energy use. This is a massive over-simplification of the building’s energy profile. Furthermore, the authors rely on the flawed methodology of “Site Energy Use Intensity (Site EUI)”, which penalizes the use of cutting-edge sustainability features such as Co-Generation and Ice Storage and, ironically, discourages density and the sharing of resources in the name of environmentalism. And, most importantly, it ignores that buildings are places which should promote the health, welfare and productivity of the people who work and live in them.
First and foremost, OBP is a building designed for people. Productivity, wellness, and providing optimal conditions for work to occur, were all drivers of the design of the building. The mechanical systems and envelope were designed to efficiently support those goals. The authors provide some good ideas for how to modify a façade to make it more energy efficient. Most of their recommendations were considered when the building was designed and many incorporated into the final constructed envelope, including:
-
High-performance glazing: The curtainwall at OBP features low-iron, insulated glazing with a ceramic frit pattern which cuts down on heat gain while still allowing for optimal views and an abundance of daylight,
-
Envelope details:
- Fritted glazing, insulated spandrel
- Overall R-value: 2.03
- Glazing Percentage: 62% vision glass
- Solar Heat Gain Coeffcient (SHGC): 0.4 for clear, 0.28 for fritted glazing
- Visual Transmittance: 74% for clear, 59% for fritted glazing
-
Envelope details:
It is true that OBP, consumes more energy compared with other buildings of its size. This is related to the level of the fenestration in the building, but not caused by it. Even if OBP featured a highly insulated exterior wall assembly with tiny porthole windows it would still have high energy use. It would also be a very unpleasant and unproductive place to work. OBP’s high energy use is primarily caused by the density of people who work in the building, the energy intensive work they do, and the delivery and conditioning of air at a high quality level. The three most significant factors that contribute to the building’s energy use are:
- Occupancy: 8,000 people work at OBP, and the building operates nearly 24-hours a day. There is significant energy required to provide adequate outside air to ventilate the space and the plug-load for that density of use is large.
- Intensity of Use: There are 350,000 square feet of extremely high-density trading operations and on-site data storage, which consume a lot of energy.
- Outside Air Delivery and Conditioning: Tempering the air in a building with that many inhabitants and a high percentage of glazing does use considerable energy, but the benefits of highly filtered outside air provided at above code required levels are substantial.
Even though OBP may consume more energy, it produces less Carbon Dioxide than similar buildings that use less energy directly from the grid. OBP only appears more inefficient because Site EUI, rather than Source EUI, is the metric used to compare energy use. Site EUI is perverse metric, which hides the inefficiencies of the grid and power plants. Instead of drawing most of its energy from power plants, OBP has an on-site 4.6-Megawatt combined heat and power (co-generation) plant that produces two thirds of the building’s energy at twice the efficiency of a conventional power plant. OBP also employs the use of an on-site Ice Storage plant as a thermal battery that shifts energy demand to off-peak hours, reducing the burden on New York City’s energy grid and carbon emissions. It also protects New York City’s air quality by reducing peak demand on the grid and keeping dirtier “peaker” plants offline. The cogeneration system converts natural gas into electric and heat energy at an efficiency that surpasses that of the utility. Yet, the energy conversion losses borne by the cogeneration plant, despite the overall reduction of carbon, are attributed to OBP and raise the overall site EUI. If Source EUI were used to compare buildings rather than Site EUI then OBP would excel compared to buildings of similar use and typology that procure energy from the existing inefficient grid and its power plants.
See Also: The glass box paradox
The authors argue that despite its design and Platinum LEED rating, the building earns an Energy Star D rating and incorrectly concludes that the building performs poorly. Local law 84, which relies on Energy Use Intensity as its metric, is a simplistic formula that compares total annual energy over the total square footage. It does not account for population density, hours of operation, building typology, specialized space types (within the office category) or any other variable. The Energy Star rating which uses the national CBECS database to calculate the score is more sophisticated than EUI alone, but the Energy Star metric does not accurately represent New York City buildings. Buildings over 1 million square feet are considered “outliers” in the Energy Star sample set and other population and operational data is truncated. Large, densely occupied, high-rise buildings in New York City are obviously very different in their energy profile than many buildings across the nation. Local law 97, penalizes buildings based on their calculated carbon footprint, which is superficially reasonable until you realize that higher density and all its environmental benefits are strongly related to a higher site EUI. New York City’s density which results in sharing of resources, decreased travel distances and the preservation of open space is, ironically, discouraged by Local Law 97.
The Durst Organization has built some of the highest performing and most environmentally advanced buildings in the world. We use energy and natural resources efficiently, but we also understand that buildings are for people and their health, wellness and productivity are equally important. A building without fenestration, no doubt, uses less energy than a building with a glass curtain wall, but we strive to make places where people flourish and thrive and natural light, fresh air and views are integral to this goal.
Related Stories
| Jul 23, 2013
Clearly Protective: Glazing for Life Safety at Seidman Cancer Center
Design team turns to fire-rated glazing for interior doors to give access to natural light, patient privacy and clear wayfinding throughout the building.
| Jul 12, 2013
Statue of Liberty Monument bolstered by Vetrotech Saint-Gobain’s fire-rated glass
The Statue of Liberty National Monument reopened to the public featuring two new fire stairwells and an elevator that will allow visitors with reduced mobility to look into the Statue’s interior structure.
| May 17, 2013
5 things AEC pros need to know about low-e glass
Low-emissivity glasses are critical to making today’s buildings brighter, more energy-efficient, and more sustainable. Here are five tips to help AEC professionals understand the differences among low-e glasses and their impact on building performance.
| May 8, 2013
Preventable curtain wall failures - AIA/CES course
In many cases, curtain wall failures are caused by fairly simple errors that occur during the fabrication and installation process. This presentation will highlight common errors and when they typically occur.
| May 8, 2013
Guardian’s Scott Thomsen headlines Glass Performance Days Finland Conference, June 11-15
Scott Thomsen, president of Guardian Industries Global Flat Glass Group, will engage the global glass technorati in an opening speech at Glass Performance Days Finland June 11-15 in Tampere. In addition, Guardian technologists and scientists will present a wide variety of technical papers and glass industry innovations.
| May 6, 2013
SAFTI FIRST announces 3D Autodesk Revit models for fire rated wall, window, and door systems
SAFTI FIRST, leading USA-manufacturer of fire rated glass and faming systems, is proud to announce that Autodesk Revit models are now available for its fire rated walls, window and door systems via www.safti.com and Autodesk Seek.
| Apr 30, 2013
Tips for designing with fire rated glass - AIA/CES course
Kate Steel of Steel Consulting Services offers tips and advice for choosing the correct code-compliant glazing product for every fire-rated application. This BD+C University class is worth 1.0 AIA LU/HSW.
| Apr 10, 2013
23 things you need to know about charter schools
Charter schools are growing like Topsy. But don’t jump on board unless you know what you’re getting into.
| Apr 8, 2013
Oldcastle Architectural acquires Expocrete Concrete Products
Oldcastle® Architectural has acquired Expocrete Concrete Products Ltd., giving North America’s largest producer of concrete masonry and hardscape products an increased presence in the high-growth region of western Canada.
| Mar 27, 2013
Small but mighty: Berkeley public library’s net-zero gem
The Building Team for Berkeley, Calif.’s new 9,500-sf West Branch library aims to achieve net-zero—and possibly net-positive—energy performance with the help of clever passive design techniques.