flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

To survive, shopping malls must shift from commerce to consumer engagement

Retail Centers

To survive, shopping malls must shift from commerce to consumer engagement

A new report on retailing’s future expects customers to have much more influence on what goods and services they are offered.


By John Caulfield, Senior Editor | February 6, 2018

Last September, the three-year-old online bedding retailer Boll & Branch opened its first brick-and-mortar outlet, a 2,137-sf space in the Mall at Short Hills (N.J.). It is billing this as an “experiental” showroom, and reportedly plans to open another 20 physical stores. Image: Boll & Branch

Add to the growing list of forecasts about the fate of retailing in America a new report by the global consulting firm A.T. Kearney that suggests the survival of shopping centers and malls will be predicated on their “morphing” into Consumer Engagement Centers (CES) that are less about buying and selling products and more about creating experiences for consumers.

“The U.S. retail sector is moving from a ‘push’ model to a ‘pull’ model where consumers are demanding more curated experiences,” explains Michael Brown, a Partner with A.T. Kearney's retail group, and co-author of “The Future of Shopping Centers.”

The report stems from a larger study his firm conducted to examine and predict prospective consumer behaviors over the next 10-15 years, says Brown. The focus of the latest report is on Millennials, who will reach their peak spending years within the next decade.

The authors note that the U.S., at 23.5 sf of retail space per person, is already seriously overstored, compared to countries like Canada (16.8 sf/person), Australia (11.2 sf), the United Kingdom (4.6 sf), and Japan (4.4 sf). The U.S. also lags Europe when it comes to locating retail in proximity to transportation hubs, and building stores that are part of mixed-use developments.

Looming in the background of A.T. Kearney's forecasts is the expanding encroachment of ecommerce. The report estimates that online purchases could account for 32% of total retail sales in the U.S. by 2030, or the equivalent of $1.53 trillion that year. That would be nearly triple the percentage in 2015, but Brown defends his firm's aggressive projections by noting that ecommerce has barely penetrated the grocery sector yet, but is likely to make a bigger splash there over the next several years, especially in light of Amazon’s $13.4 billion purchase of Whole Foods last year.

In addition, the report expects that, by 2030, at least two-fifths of all consumers will be digital natives who won’t draw distinctions between digital and physical retailing. Consequently, it is critical for retailers to master and embrace digital retailing not only to communicate with shoppers and transact business, but also to identify new customers, track purchases, and analyze patterns.

The report talks about how technology is creating “personalized digital ecologies” for consumers, which CES operators need to tap into along with autonomous, on-demand mobility technologies (from driverless cars to robots) that could play a much bigger role in future shopping experiences.

Online purchases could account for nearly one-third of all U.S. retail sales by 2030. Retailers need to embrace digital commerce to attract consumers who are less disposed to distinguish between on- and offline shopping experiences. Image: A.T. Kearney

 

Logistics will determine winners from losers

When it comes to product assortments, retailers now find themselves scrambling to respond to consumer fragmentation, which Brown explains is leading toward “micro segmentation” that has the potential to cut into big-brand hegemony. Consequently, retailers need to build a logistical infrastructure driven by data analytics that allows them to offer multiple brands they can switch in and out of relatively quickly as consumer buying trends change.

The report believes consumers are going to want a lot more say in the goods and services that retailers bring to market. Their veto power starts with their smartphones, which give them the alacrity to select, or block, any input they choose. Advances in smartphone technology—along with advances in 3D printing, machine-to-machine interfaces, and artificial intelligence—will not only give consumers greater expectations about the control they wield over what goods and services retailers make available to them, but also how those products are ultimately delivered.

Physical stores aren’t going away; in fact, dealers are opening more stores in the U.S. And the picture about retailing’s future gets muddled when online retailers like Amazon and Boll & Branch are opening brick-and-mortar stores.

Even though the U.S. in overstored, dealers continue to open new outlets, although a growing number are using stores more as showrooms and distribution hubs for pickup by consumers who made their purchases online. Image: A.T. Kearney

 

But physical space, says Brown, is more likely to be used in the future to display merchandise and build experiences with consumers than to conduct actual buying and selling of products. He points specifically to the sporting goods retailer Foot Locker, which is reducing its store count but enlarging its remaining stores to enhance shoppers’ experience; and the home furnishings retailer Restoration Hardware, which has been opening “mansion” stores, 50,000- to 60,000-sf showrooms that support this dealer’s online selling strategy.

“Walmart and Amazon are successful because of their logistics,” says Brown, “and the speed and agility of a dealer’s infrastructure will be what’s important” going forward.

A.T. Kearney’s report divides successful future shopping centers into four distinct types:

•Destination centers that are regional malls with flagships, tenants that cater to specialized shopper groups, and possibly nontraditional anchors like theme parks. These destination centers could serve as digital distribution hubs, and even offer customers weekend experiences by tying into restaurants, hotels, and local entertainment;

•“Retaildential” centers, mixed-use facilities that are built to incorporate housing and are conveniently located near mass transit options;

•Value centers “that are anchored by an idea, not a retail nameplate,” the report states. Brown explains that value centers might cater to a specific ethnic group of customers, or to comsumers with like interests such as sports, fashion, or dining. These centers could include spaces for concerts, competitions, exhibits, and community events; and

•Innovation centers, that might be part-store, part research facility. They could include test stores and alternating-themed retail environments for the purpose of analyzing shoppers’ needs and behaviors over time.

 

Related Stories

| Jul 28, 2014

Reconstruction Sector Engineering Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Jacobs, URS, and Wiss, Janney, Elstner top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest reconstruction engineering and engineering/architecture firms in the U.S.

| Jul 28, 2014

Reconstruction Sector Architecture Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Stantec, HDR, and HOK top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest reconstruction architecture and architecture/engineering firms in the U.S.

| Jul 25, 2014

Grocery stores choosing Green Globes for building sustainability certification

The Green Building Initiative (GBI) has announced a wave of Green Globes certifications for new grocery stores, including New Seasons Markets, Whole Foods, Price Chopper, Aldi’s, Harris Teeter, Wegmans, and Publix.

| Jul 23, 2014

Architecture Billings Index up nearly a point in June

AIA reported the June ABI score was 53.5, up from a mark of 52.6 in May.

| Jul 21, 2014

Economists ponder uneven recovery, weigh benefits of big infrastructure [2014 Giants 300 Report]

According to expert forecasters, multifamily projects, the Panama Canal expansion, and the petroleum industry’s “shale gale” could be saving graces for commercial AEC firms seeking growth opportunities in an economy that’s provided its share of recent disappointments.

| Jul 18, 2014

Contractors warm up to new technologies, invent new management schemes [2014 Giants 300 Report]

“UAV.” “LATISTA.” “CMST.” If BD+C Giants 300 contractors have anything to say about it, these new terms may someday be as well known as “BIM” or “LEED.” Here’s a sampling of what Giant GCs and CMs are doing by way of technological and managerial innovation.

| Jul 18, 2014

Top Construction Management Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Jacobs, Barton Malow, Hill International top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest construction management and project management firms in the United States. 

| Jul 18, 2014

Top Contractors [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Turner, Whiting-Turner, Skanska top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest contractors in the United States. 

| Jul 18, 2014

Engineering firms look to bolster growth through new services, technology [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Following solid revenue growth in 2013, the majority of U.S.-based engineering and engineering/architecture firms expect more of the same this year, according to BD+C’s 2014 Giants 300 report. 

| Jul 18, 2014

Top Engineering/Architecture Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Jacobs, AECOM, Parsons Brinckerhoff top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest engineering/architecture firms in the United States.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021