According to a survey released today, NCAA athletic directors (ADs) are increasingly focused on enhancing athletic facilities to attract top student athletes and maintain or grow their fan base amidst an extremely competitive environment.
The Trends in Collegiate Athletics survey, conducted by AECOM and Ohio University's Center for Sports Administration, was completed in July-August 2014. The survey gauged the sentiment of 136 ADs from all three major NCAA divisions, including over 60% from Division I conferences, on topics related to venues, facilities, and student-athlete and fan experience.
According to the survey, more than eight in 10 participating ADs plan to make significant investments in facilities over the next five years to target potential recruits and spectators. Of those, one in five plans on spending more than $50 million on renovations and new construction projects. Nearly 95% of ADs are concerned about the funding of their programs.
The majority of participating ADs are investing in upgrades and amenities that they believe will drive game-day attendance and enhance the fan experience, notably connectivity, better food and beverage options, and, particularly at the Division I level, premium seating.
“This survey shows that, as traditional funding streams become less viable, ADs are increasingly focused on fiscal responsibility and making their programs sustainable,” said Jon Niemuth, AECOM Director of Sports, Americas. “One way they are doing this is by investing in upscale amenities, once reserved for the professional level, that will attract fans willing to pay a premium for a unique game day experience.”
“A big issue keeping athletic directors up at night is the funding and performance of their programs,” said Dr. Heather Lawrence-Benedict, Associate Professor of Sports Administration and the AECOM Professor of Sport Business, Ohio University. “ADs are caught in a cyclical pattern—to generate funding they need talented recruits, to attract recruits they need the top facilities, and to build those facilities it goes back to funding. On top of this, they need to appeal to alumni and donors. An unexpected donation, a breakout athlete or a Cinderella season can all be major catalysts for an athletics program.”
To help generate awareness for their upgrades and promote games and game-day activities, the vast majority of ADs (96%) in the study find social media to be an effective marketing tool for drawing fans or first-time visitors to games. That compares to 59% who view paid advertising as effective. Lowering ticket costs was ranked as the least effective option to draw fans by one-third of participating ADs.
ADs are also focused on facility upgrades that will enhance the student athlete experience, and ADs overwhelmingly agree that practice and training facilities are a primary force that attracts recruits, while academic, housing and dining facilities are also rapidly becoming important. If funding was not a factor, ADs would invest heavily in practice and training facilities and locker rooms to appeal to potential recruits.
AECOM and Ohio University’s Center for Sports Administration developed the Trends in Collegiate Athletics through a collaborative effort as part of their ongoing strategic partnership, which began in 2007. The joint effort, which was extended for the third time in 2013, is aimed at educating the next generation of sports business leaders.
To view the full results of the survey, click here.
Related Stories
| Jul 21, 2014
Economists ponder uneven recovery, weigh benefits of big infrastructure [2014 Giants 300 Report]
According to expert forecasters, multifamily projects, the Panama Canal expansion, and the petroleum industry’s “shale gale” could be saving graces for commercial AEC firms seeking growth opportunities in an economy that’s provided its share of recent disappointments.
| Jul 21, 2014
Workplace trends survey reveals generational patterns in office use
Data analysis from Mancini•Duffy indicates significant variations among age cohorts in the workplace.
| Jul 20, 2014
IPD contract saves time and money for cancer center [2014 Building Team Awards]
Partners share the risk and reward of extreme collaboration on this LEED Silver project, which relies heavily on Lean principles.
| Jul 20, 2014
Why every major U.S. city should be nurturing ‘Innovation Hubs’
Today, more than ever, tech districts are the key to economic growth for metro markets. A new report from the Brookings Institution calls tech hubs the superchargers of innovation economies and creators of highly coveted tech jobs.
| Jul 18, 2014
Contractors warm up to new technologies, invent new management schemes [2014 Giants 300 Report]
“UAV.” “LATISTA.” “CMST.” If BD+C Giants 300 contractors have anything to say about it, these new terms may someday be as well known as “BIM” or “LEED.” Here’s a sampling of what Giant GCs and CMs are doing by way of technological and managerial innovation.
| Jul 18, 2014
Top Construction Management Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]
Jacobs, Barton Malow, Hill International top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest construction management and project management firms in the United States.
| Jul 18, 2014
Top Contractors [2014 Giants 300 Report]
Turner, Whiting-Turner, Skanska top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest contractors in the United States.
| Jul 18, 2014
Engineering firms look to bolster growth through new services, technology [2014 Giants 300 Report]
Following solid revenue growth in 2013, the majority of U.S.-based engineering and engineering/architecture firms expect more of the same this year, according to BD+C’s 2014 Giants 300 report.
| Jul 18, 2014
Top Engineering/Architecture Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]
Jacobs, AECOM, Parsons Brinckerhoff top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest engineering/architecture firms in the United States.
