flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Study compares labor hours for various low-slope roofing options

Codes and Standards

Study compares labor hours for various low-slope roofing options

Type of roof covering, project parameters, tool management, and crew efficiency all impact profitability.


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | January 2, 2019
Study compares labor hours for various low-slope roofing options

Courtesy CertainTeed Corporation

A new study commissioned by Certain Teed Corp., “Factors Impacting Low-Slope Roofing Costs: A National Labor Study,” compares the amount of labor needed to complete various low-slope roofing project types.

A bituminous roof with a mechanically attached base and self-adhered cap took the fewest labor hours to install. The most labor-intensive roofing type was bituminous with a hot asphalt mopped base and a hot asphalt mopped cap.

The independent, five-year nationwide study found that the type of roof covering, project parameters, tool management, and crew efficiency are all major factors impacting contractor profits. Poorly managed crews, faulty tools and extreme climates will increase installation time, regardless of product selection, the study says.

The study is intended to help roofing contractors optimize allocation of labor from existing crews. It is also a reference contractors can use to compare their labor costs to a current, comprehensive national average.

Related Stories

Contractors | Jun 30, 2016

Chicago contractor found guilty of fraud on city’s requirement on minority-owned businesses

Alleged to have been sham business in bid to win city public works contract.  

Codes and Standards | Jun 29, 2016

OSHA starts evaluation of construction industry noise standards

New studies indicate significant number of construction workers suffer hearing loss.  

Seismic Design | Jun 28, 2016

ASTM International updates seismic risk standards

Expected to improve consistency of risk evaluation on commercial real estate transactions.  

Codes and Standards | Jun 17, 2016

Feds publish framework for evaluating public-private partnerships

No single factor determines whether a project yields stronger benefit as a P3.  

AEC Tech | Jun 17, 2016

Driverless cars could soon start impacting commercial, retail project design

Offsite parking and more space for valet parking lines are among the foreseeable changes.

Codes and Standards | Jun 17, 2016

Bay State moves toward single BIM protocol on state projects

Massport’s guidelines a step forward for integrated BIM initiative.  

Multifamily Housing | Jun 14, 2016

San Francisco voters approve tougher affordability requirement on new housing development

Critics charge that the measure may backfire and actually reduce new affordable units.  

Concrete | Jun 13, 2016

American Concrete Institute releases new Guide to Shotcrete

Includes information on application procedures, testing.  

Healthcare Facilities | Jun 10, 2016

Top 10 health technology hazards include some influenced by space design

ECRI Institute’s annual list includes operational and workflow issues.  

Codes and Standards | Jun 9, 2016

Supreme Court ruling could aid developers on properties containing wetlands

Unanimous decision allows landowners to take regulatory decisions straight to court.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category


Reconstruction & Renovation

Movement to protect historic buildings raises sharp criticism

While the movement to preserve historic buildings has widespread support, it also has some sharp critics with well-funded opposition groups springing up in recent years. Some opponents are linked to the Stand Together Foundation, founded and bankrolled by the Koch family’s conservative philanthropic organization, according to a column in Governing magazine.



halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021