flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Safety concerns over wood-frame construction raised after Raleigh apartment fire

Codes and Standards

Safety concerns over wood-frame construction raised after Raleigh apartment fire

The unfinished building was destroyed in a five-alarm blaze.


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | March 28, 2017

Pixabay Public Domain

After a massive five-alarm fire destroyed a partially constructed five-story, 241-unit, $51 million apartment building in Raleigh, the safety of wood-frame construction came under scrutiny.

The blaze also caused minor damage of a neighboring wood-framed, multi-family building and forced the evacuation of its residents. The Raleigh News & Observer subsequently published an extensive report on the pros and cons of wood-framed structures, interviewing professionals in the design and construction industry and developers.

The building, a pedestal structure with a poured-concrete first level and four stories of wood-frame construction above, was about 40% complete—making it vulnerable to fire. The president of Raleigh’s firefighter union told the newspaper that wood-frame buildings are safe once finished and after sprinklers installed. Before then, the structures are like a four-story lumber yard, the firefighter told the News & Observer.

North Carolina adopted a change to the national building code in 2009 that increased the number of wood-frame stories that can be built on a pedestal or slab from four to five.

Related Stories

| Sep 1, 2011

Project Aims to Automate Code Compliance Assessment

FIATECH, a consortium of owners from the industrial, power, and retail markets that build large structures, launched a project this year to validate the use of automation technology for code compliance assessment, and to accelerate the regulatory approval process using building models. Long-term objectives include the development of an extensive, open-source rule set library that is approved by industry and regulatory bodies for use by technology developers and code officials.

| Sep 1, 2011

EPA Says Additional Lead Paint Cleaning Rules Not Necessary

The EPA has concluded that current Lead: Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program (LRRP) cleaning requirements and lead-safe work regulations are sufficient to protect the public from lead dust hazards. “Our members have been instrumental in contacting legislators to detail the detrimental impact of the current LRRP," says Richard Walker, American Architectural Manufacturers Association’s president and CEO. “This collective industry voice has prompted the EPA to make the responsible decision to refrain from adding further, unnecessary costs to homeowners under the current economic climate."http://www.aamanet.org/news/1/10/0/all/603/aama-commends-its-members-congress-for-vacating-lrrp-clearance-rule

| Aug 11, 2010

Best AEC Firms of 2011/12

Later this year, we will launch Best AEC Firms 2012. We’re looking for firms that create truly positive workplaces for their AEC professionals and support staff. Keep an eye on this page for entry information. +

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category


Resiliency

U.S. is reducing floodplain development in most areas

The perception that the U.S. has not been able to curb development in flood-prone areas is mostly inaccurate, according to new research from climate adaptation experts. A national survey of floodplain development between 2001 and 2019 found that fewer structures were built in floodplains than might be expected if cities were building at random.



halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021