Upon its completion in 1918, the building that is now the Atascadero (Calif.) City Hall was the very picture of stability. Intended as the centerpiece of Atascadero Colony—a planned utopian community—the Italian Renaissance structure featured a cruciform plan, with ornate central rotundas on the first and fourth floors.
Though the idealized colony never really jelled, the area did thrive, and the building passed through several commercial uses before the County of San Luis Obispo acquired it in 1950. When the city of Atascadero was incorporated 29 years later, the county handed the building over for city offices. The hall, with its grand pillared entrances and red-tiled dome, is featured on the city seal and listed on both the National and California Registers of Historic Places.
In December 2003, the 6.5 magnitude San Simeon earthquake ravaged Atascadero. As city workers dove for cover, the upper rotunda was twisted and wrenched away from its structural moorings. Interior walls and exterior masonry were extensively damaged, and the building was ultimately red-tagged. However, city officials were determined to restore, and improve, the beloved landmark.
Pfeiffer Partners Architects undertook a two-year assessment, including a laser-scan analysis as well as painstaking physical investigations and measurements. The Atascadero Historical Society, an enthusiastic collaborator, provided invaluable documentation of original conditions. Three packages of work were eventually developed: demolition, FEMA-funded damage repair and hazard mitigation, and city-funded rehabilitation.
PLATINUM AWARD
ATASCADERO CITY HALL
Atascadero, Calif.Building Team
Submitting firm: Bernards (construction manager)
Owner: City of Atascadero
Architect: Pfeiffer Partners Architects
Structural engineer: Nabih Youssef Associates
MEP engineer: Davidovich & Associates
General contractor: Diani Building Corp.General Information
Size: 58,900 sf
Construction cost: $21.7 million
Construction time: June 2010 to September 2013
Delivery method: CM agency/multi-prime
The 2008 economic crash posed financial difficulties, and anticipated state funding was eliminated in the subsequent recession. Meanwhile, water infiltration caused additional damage despite the owner’s best efforts to keep rain out. Under the management of Bernards, construction finally began in 2010, nearly seven years after the quake occurred.
Stabilizing the structure was obviously the most pressing need. The original building consisted of cast-in-place reinforced concrete floors and unreinforced masonry infill walls between a structural steel, concrete-encased post-and-beam skeleton. Above the fourth floor, the building was essentially an unreinforced masonry structure.
Crews strengthened the existing foundation by drilling 248 micro-piles 80 feet deep into bedrock, and pouring pile caps below the foundation. A new structural concrete slab-on-grade was installed at the basement level. Interior perimeter walls up to the fourth floor were stripped to reveal the structure, which was reinforced with more than a million tons of shotcrete and 80,000 pounds of rebar—in essence, creating a building within a building.
To fix the upper floors and dome, crews removed most of the exterior cladding, then rebuilt with additional steel and fiber-reinforced polymer instead of shotcrete, which would have been too heavy. Existing steel was horizontally and vertically braced, and roof dome framing members were retrofitted.
When structural improvements were complete, crews used as much of the original masonry as possible to rebuild the walls and roof. In the heavily damaged upper section, about 15% of the roof tiles and 80% of the bricks had to be replaced with color-matched materials. When possible, original tiles, fascia balustrades, and decorative plaster were repaired, cleaned, and returned to their original spots.
The lower rotunda benefited from a new paint scheme inspired by the greens and browns of the California landscape; the painter, a local artisan, donated half of his change-order hours back to the city. Second-floor window overlooks, once blocked, were uncovered and restored, providing views into the space from surrounding office zones. Light boxes behind frosted lunettes give the illusion of natural daylight. In reality, this dome is internal and is topped by a second rotunda housing the City Council chambers.
IMPROVING INTERIOR DESIGN
Interior reconfiguration was also crucial to improving functionality. Over the years, alterations had resulted in a confusing layout and awkwardly shaped spaces, as well as problematic ventilation. Crews removed most of the interior partitions and built new walls to establish a more sensible floor plan. Efficient HVAC and communications infrastructure was installed.
The lower rotunda was programmed as lobby space and a permit center. Three floors of offices surround this focal point. City Council chambers were constructed in the domed upper rotunda, which once held a library. A small historical museum received a place of honor, reinforcing the building’s link with the town.
More than 90% of construction dollars went to firms on the Central Coast, including $5.5 million to local glass, concrete, and masonry contractors. The final construction cost was $3.3 million less than the original $25 million estimate. Bernards credits the multi-prime contract process, encompassing 17 separately bid categories, for the savings. City Hall opened on schedule in August 2013, just in time for Atascadero’s centennial—an embodiment of civic resilience, determination, and pride.
Elegant detailing, a hallmark of the Italian Renaissance style, was re-established in the post-earthquake reconstruction.
Related Stories
| Jul 21, 2014
Designing the process of leadership transition
Transition planning can be one of the more complex challenges that firms face. Effective plans begin by determining the gap between a firm’s current state and the future it envisions for itself. SPONSORED CONTENT
| Jul 21, 2014
16 utility questions to answer during your building project
We need electricity to power our building projects, along with water and gas and a faultless sanitation system. That’s what we think about when we think about utility requirements for our building project, but are we missing something? SPONSORED CONTENT
| Jul 21, 2014
Commercial real estate development growing at strongest pace since recovery began: NAIOP report
Industrial, warehousing, office, and retail sectors see strong gains; Texas leads the nation in construction-value stats.
| Jul 21, 2014
Economists ponder uneven recovery, weigh benefits of big infrastructure [2014 Giants 300 Report]
According to expert forecasters, multifamily projects, the Panama Canal expansion, and the petroleum industry’s “shale gale” could be saving graces for commercial AEC firms seeking growth opportunities in an economy that’s provided its share of recent disappointments.
| Jul 21, 2014
Workplace trends survey reveals generational patterns in office use
Data analysis from Mancini•Duffy indicates significant variations among age cohorts in the workplace.
| Jul 20, 2014
IPD contract saves time and money for cancer center [2014 Building Team Awards]
Partners share the risk and reward of extreme collaboration on this LEED Silver project, which relies heavily on Lean principles.
| Jul 20, 2014
Why every major U.S. city should be nurturing ‘Innovation Hubs’
Today, more than ever, tech districts are the key to economic growth for metro markets. A new report from the Brookings Institution calls tech hubs the superchargers of innovation economies and creators of highly coveted tech jobs.
| Jul 18, 2014
Contractors warm up to new technologies, invent new management schemes [2014 Giants 300 Report]
“UAV.” “LATISTA.” “CMST.” If BD+C Giants 300 contractors have anything to say about it, these new terms may someday be as well known as “BIM” or “LEED.” Here’s a sampling of what Giant GCs and CMs are doing by way of technological and managerial innovation.
| Jul 18, 2014
Top Construction Management Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]
Jacobs, Barton Malow, Hill International top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest construction management and project management firms in the United States.
