Top Transit Facility Sector Architecture Firms
Rank | Company | 2013 Transit Sector Revenue |
1 | Leo A Daly | $19,803,803 |
2 | HDR | $8,100,000 |
3 | RNL | $7,417,000 |
4 | NORR | $7,300,016 |
5 | Heery International | $5,041,778 |
6 | Perkins+will | $4,800,000 |
7 | Perkins Eastman | $4,650,000 |
8 | ZGF Architects | $4,202,825 |
9 | FXFOWLE Architects | $3,600,000 |
10 | Epstein | $3,064,000 |
11 | HOK | $2,934,633 |
12 | LMN Architects | $2,277,300 |
13 | Gensler | $2,177,922 |
14 | Stantec | $1,705,602 |
15 | Solomon Cordwell Buenz | $1,700,000 |
16 | IBI Group ? Gruzen Samton | $1,500,000 |
17 | Cooper Carry | $1,490,792 |
18 | Legat Architects | $1,458,600 |
19 | Beyer Blinder Belle | $1,123,611 |
20 | Ratio Architects | $862,924 |
21 | Wight & Company | $525,000 |
22 | Kohn Pedersen Fox Associates | $461,700 |
23 | Niles Bolton Associates | $458,200 |
24 | BLTa | $393,000 |
25 | Becker Morgan Group | $350,869 |
26 | Hoffmann Architects | $310,000 |
27 | Lord Aeck Sargent | $282,129 |
28 | NAC|Architecture | $267,646 |
29 | HNTB Corp. | $162,805 |
30 | Symmes Maini & McKee Associates | $70,000 |
31 | CTA Architects Engineers | $21,997 |
32 | TEG Architects | $15,000 |
Top Transit Facility Sector Engineering Firms
Rank | Company | 2013 Transit Sector Revenue |
1 | URS Corp. | $80,426,891 |
2 | AECOM Technology Corp. | $73,630,000 |
3 | Parsons Brinckerhoff | $63,647,346 |
4 | Jacobs | $59,000,000 |
5 | Arup | $30,762,561 |
6 | STV | $29,294,000 |
7 | KPFF Consulting Engineers | $5,500,000 |
8 | Thornton Tomasetti | $4,745,871 |
9 | Ross & Baruzzini | $4,443,353 |
10 | Simpson Gumpertz & Heger | $4,230,000 |
11 | Leidos | $2,540,000 |
12 | TLC Engineering for Architecture | $1,948,605 |
13 | WSP Group | $1,930,000 |
14 | Coffman Engineers | $1,439,383 |
15 | Glumac | $726,059 |
16 | Dewberry | $650,000 |
17 | Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr & Huber | $600,000 |
18 | Brinjac Engineering | $579,114 |
19 | AKF Group | $547,000 |
20 | Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corp. | $500,000 |
21 | Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates | $470,000 |
22 | BR+A Consulting Engineers | $460,000 |
23 | Paulus, Sokolowski and Sartor | $330,000 |
24 | M-E Engineers | $250,000 |
25 | Martin/Martin | $228,163 |
26 | Highland Associates | $200,000 |
27 | Spectrum Engineers | $142,474 |
28 | Dunham Associates | $125,000 |
29 | Environmental Systems Design | $124,172 |
30 | Guernsey | $123,196 |
31 | CJL Engineering | $105,050 |
32 | Allen & Shariff | $100,000 |
33 | Bridgers & Paxton Consulting Engineers | $84,347 |
34 | Interface Engineering | $49,000 |
35 | Apogee Consulting Group | $13,200 |
36 | P2S Engineering | $11,368 |
37 | Karpinski Engineering | $10,480 |
38 | Henderson Engineers | $8,777 |
39 | Newcomb & Boyd | $8,537 |
Top Transit Facility Sector Construction Firms
Rank | Company | 2013 Transit Sector Revenue |
1 | Skanska USA | $428,852,738 |
2 | Walsh Group, The | $230,787,366 |
3 | Clark Group | $186,244,504 |
4 | Turner Construction | $158,400,000 |
5 | Tutor Perini Corp. | $125,550,873 |
6 | Parsons Brinckerhoff | $63,647,346 |
7 | Hoffman Construction | $61,000,000 |
8 | Whiting-Turner Contracting Co., The | $56,441,628 |
9 | Bernards | $44,000,000 |
10 | STV | $29,294,000 |
11 | LPCiminelli | $25,006,749 |
12 | McCarthy Holdings | $19,250,000 |
13 | Hill International | $17,000,000 |
14 | Suffolk Construction | $16,487,695 |
15 | Adolfson & Peterson Construction | $15,201,393 |
16 | Bomel Construction | $7,064,099 |
17 | Gilbane | $6,840,400 |
18 | Absher Construction | $6,107,896 |
19 | Heery International | $5,041,778 |
20 | Coakley & Williams Construction | $2,803,663 |
21 | Ryan Companies US | $609,623 |
22 | Wight & Company | $188,000 |
23 | Astorino | $163,558 |
24 | Allen & Shariff | $100,000 |
25 | W. M. Jordan Company | $70,840 |
Read BD+C's full 2014 Giants 300 Report
Related Stories
| Aug 23, 2011
Acoustical design education model
Pass this exam and earn 1.0 AIA/CES Discovery learning units. You must go to www.BDCnetwork.com/EnhancedAcousticalDesign to take this exam.
| Aug 19, 2011
Thought Leader: Boyd R. Zoccola, chair and chief elected officer of BOMA International
Boyd R. Zoccola is Chair and Chief Elected Officer of BOMA International. A BOMA member since 1994, he has served on the Executive, Finance, Investment, and Medical/Healthcare Facilities Committees. An Indiana Real Estate Principal Broker and a board member of the Real Estate Round Table, he is Executive Vice President of Hokanson Companies, Inc., of Indianapolis, and has been involved in the development of $600 million worth of real estate. On a volunteer basis, Zoccola was president of Horizon House and a board member of Girls, Inc. He holds a BA in biology from Indiana University.
| Aug 19, 2011
How and why AEC professionals choose flooring systems
Design and construction professionals who completed our flooring survey had strong opinions about their preferred flooring type.
| Aug 19, 2011
Underfloor air distribution, how to get the details right
Our experts provide solid advice on the correct way to design and construct underfloor air distribution systems, to yield significant energy savings.
| Aug 19, 2011
Enhanced acoustical design
Ambient noise levels in some facility types are trending up and becoming a barrier to clear communication between building occupants.
| Jul 22, 2011
The Right Platform for IPD
Workstations for successful integrated project delivery, a white paper by Dell and BD+C.
| Jul 22, 2011
High-performance windows and doors
Learning objectives After reading this article, you should be able to: Understand issues of thermal performance and energy efficiency in relation to window and door systems; describe optimal detailing of the window-wall interface and how it contributes to building performance, sustainability, and occupant well-being; understand how durability contributes to sustainable windows/doors; and list sustainable O&M requirements for window and door systems.
| Jul 21, 2011
Falling Architecture Billings Index reflects decrease in design demands
This months Architecture Billings Index (ABI), provided by the American Institute of Architects, is almost a full point lower than last month’s reported score. June’s reading of 47.2 was short of the required 50 to achieve billings increases, making July’s reading of 46.3 an unwelcome sign of market tidings.