Top Transit Facility Sector Architecture Firms
Rank | Company | 2013 Transit Sector Revenue |
1 | Leo A Daly | $19,803,803 |
2 | HDR | $8,100,000 |
3 | RNL | $7,417,000 |
4 | NORR | $7,300,016 |
5 | Heery International | $5,041,778 |
6 | Perkins+will | $4,800,000 |
7 | Perkins Eastman | $4,650,000 |
8 | ZGF Architects | $4,202,825 |
9 | FXFOWLE Architects | $3,600,000 |
10 | Epstein | $3,064,000 |
11 | HOK | $2,934,633 |
12 | LMN Architects | $2,277,300 |
13 | Gensler | $2,177,922 |
14 | Stantec | $1,705,602 |
15 | Solomon Cordwell Buenz | $1,700,000 |
16 | IBI Group ? Gruzen Samton | $1,500,000 |
17 | Cooper Carry | $1,490,792 |
18 | Legat Architects | $1,458,600 |
19 | Beyer Blinder Belle | $1,123,611 |
20 | Ratio Architects | $862,924 |
21 | Wight & Company | $525,000 |
22 | Kohn Pedersen Fox Associates | $461,700 |
23 | Niles Bolton Associates | $458,200 |
24 | BLTa | $393,000 |
25 | Becker Morgan Group | $350,869 |
26 | Hoffmann Architects | $310,000 |
27 | Lord Aeck Sargent | $282,129 |
28 | NAC|Architecture | $267,646 |
29 | HNTB Corp. | $162,805 |
30 | Symmes Maini & McKee Associates | $70,000 |
31 | CTA Architects Engineers | $21,997 |
32 | TEG Architects | $15,000 |
Top Transit Facility Sector Engineering Firms
Rank | Company | 2013 Transit Sector Revenue |
1 | URS Corp. | $80,426,891 |
2 | AECOM Technology Corp. | $73,630,000 |
3 | Parsons Brinckerhoff | $63,647,346 |
4 | Jacobs | $59,000,000 |
5 | Arup | $30,762,561 |
6 | STV | $29,294,000 |
7 | KPFF Consulting Engineers | $5,500,000 |
8 | Thornton Tomasetti | $4,745,871 |
9 | Ross & Baruzzini | $4,443,353 |
10 | Simpson Gumpertz & Heger | $4,230,000 |
11 | Leidos | $2,540,000 |
12 | TLC Engineering for Architecture | $1,948,605 |
13 | WSP Group | $1,930,000 |
14 | Coffman Engineers | $1,439,383 |
15 | Glumac | $726,059 |
16 | Dewberry | $650,000 |
17 | Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr & Huber | $600,000 |
18 | Brinjac Engineering | $579,114 |
19 | AKF Group | $547,000 |
20 | Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corp. | $500,000 |
21 | Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates | $470,000 |
22 | BR+A Consulting Engineers | $460,000 |
23 | Paulus, Sokolowski and Sartor | $330,000 |
24 | M-E Engineers | $250,000 |
25 | Martin/Martin | $228,163 |
26 | Highland Associates | $200,000 |
27 | Spectrum Engineers | $142,474 |
28 | Dunham Associates | $125,000 |
29 | Environmental Systems Design | $124,172 |
30 | Guernsey | $123,196 |
31 | CJL Engineering | $105,050 |
32 | Allen & Shariff | $100,000 |
33 | Bridgers & Paxton Consulting Engineers | $84,347 |
34 | Interface Engineering | $49,000 |
35 | Apogee Consulting Group | $13,200 |
36 | P2S Engineering | $11,368 |
37 | Karpinski Engineering | $10,480 |
38 | Henderson Engineers | $8,777 |
39 | Newcomb & Boyd | $8,537 |
Top Transit Facility Sector Construction Firms
Rank | Company | 2013 Transit Sector Revenue |
1 | Skanska USA | $428,852,738 |
2 | Walsh Group, The | $230,787,366 |
3 | Clark Group | $186,244,504 |
4 | Turner Construction | $158,400,000 |
5 | Tutor Perini Corp. | $125,550,873 |
6 | Parsons Brinckerhoff | $63,647,346 |
7 | Hoffman Construction | $61,000,000 |
8 | Whiting-Turner Contracting Co., The | $56,441,628 |
9 | Bernards | $44,000,000 |
10 | STV | $29,294,000 |
11 | LPCiminelli | $25,006,749 |
12 | McCarthy Holdings | $19,250,000 |
13 | Hill International | $17,000,000 |
14 | Suffolk Construction | $16,487,695 |
15 | Adolfson & Peterson Construction | $15,201,393 |
16 | Bomel Construction | $7,064,099 |
17 | Gilbane | $6,840,400 |
18 | Absher Construction | $6,107,896 |
19 | Heery International | $5,041,778 |
20 | Coakley & Williams Construction | $2,803,663 |
21 | Ryan Companies US | $609,623 |
22 | Wight & Company | $188,000 |
23 | Astorino | $163,558 |
24 | Allen & Shariff | $100,000 |
25 | W. M. Jordan Company | $70,840 |
Read BD+C's full 2014 Giants 300 Report
Related Stories
Building Team | Dec 8, 2016
The NYC Public Design Commission recognizes 12 projects with its 2016 Excellence in Design Award
2016 marked the 34th year the Public Design Commission has handed out its Excellence in Design Awards.
Education Facilities | Dec 7, 2016
How corporate design keeps educational design relevant
Learning is a lot like working; it varies daily, ranges from individual to collaborative, formal to informal and from hands on to digital.
| Dec 6, 2016
Workplace pilots: Test. Learn. Build
Differentiated from mock-ups or beta sites, workplace pilots are small scale built work environments, where an organization’s employees permanently reside and work on a daily basis.
Building Team | Dec 2, 2016
Alexandria Real Estate Equities becomes first real estate investment trust to be named a First-in-Class Fitwel Champion
Fitwel building certification was developed to foster positive impacts on building occupant health and productivity through improvements to workplace design and policies.
Government Buildings | Dec 1, 2016
Unlocking innovation in the government workplace
Government work settings ranked the lowest in their effectiveness across the four work modes: focus (individual) work, collaboration, socializing (informal gathering that fosters trust and teamwork) and learning.
Architects | Nov 20, 2016
D.C.’s first distillery-eatery taps into a growing trend
The stylish location targets customers craving craft spirits and late-night dining.
Architects | Nov 18, 2016
A Frank Lloyd Wright building in Montana will soon be demolished, or will it?
The building is one of only three Frank Lloyd Wright-designed buildings in the state.
Architects | Nov 11, 2016
Six finalists selected for London’s Illuminated River competition
The competition is searching for the best design for lighting the bridges of central London.
Healthcare Facilities | Nov 10, 2016
Prescription for success: Managing technology in the design of healthcare facilities
While the benefits of intelligently deployed technology are abundantly clear to both designers and healthcare end-users, it’s no simple task to manage the integration of technology into a building program.
Industry Research | Nov 4, 2016
New survey exposes achievement gap between men and women designers
Female architects still feel disadvantaged when it comes to career advancement.