flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Ranked: Top international AEC firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Ranked: Top international AEC firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Parsons Brinckerhoff, Gensler, and Jacobs top BD+C's rankings of U.S.-based design and construction firms with the most revenue from international projects.


By BD+C Staff | September 15, 2014
Head offices for the Federation of Korean Industries. Photo: courtesy Adrian Smi
Head offices for the Federation of Korean Industries. Photo: courtesy Adrian Smith + Gordon Gill Architecture

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Top International Architecture Firms

Rank Company 2013 International Building Revenue
1 Gensler $207,760,000
2 Skidmore, Owings & Merrill $174,884,052
3 HOK $146,000,000
4 Kohn Pedersen Fox Associates $135,121,000
5 HDR $123,700,000
6 RTKL Associates $105,228,000
7 Perkins+will $86,420,000
8 Callison $82,668,321
9 WATG | Wimberly Interiors $62,305,000
10 Stantec $57,490,350
11 NBBJ $51,691,000
12 Page $40,000,000
13 Perkins Eastman $38,750,000
14 HKS $36,120,903
15 Populous $31,442,000
16 Adrian Smith + Gordon Gill Architecture $28,570,000
17 NORR $26,355,578
18 Jerde Partnership, The $20,500,000
19 Leo A Daly $19,050,000
20 MulvannyG2 Architecture $18,000,000
21 Goettsch Partners $14,950,000
22 Cambridge Seven Associates $14,657,400
23 SmithGroupJJR $13,100,000
24 VOA Associates $12,558,614
25 WD Partners $11,500,000
26 Smallwood, Reynolds, Stewart, Stewart & Associates $9,208,743
27 Davis Brody Bond $7,700,125
28 FXFOWLE Architects $7,680,000
29 CannonDesign $7,000,000
30 GBBN Architects $6,980,000
31 Epstein $6,731,000
32 Flad Architects $6,580,000
33 MBH Architects $5,471,000
34 Hammel, Green and Abrahamson $5,100,000
35 Cuningham Group Architecture $4,798,454
36 Payette $4,488,512
37 Clark Nexsen $4,435,941
38 ZGF Architects $4,374,417
39 WHR Architects $3,907,392
40 Parkhill, Smith & Cooper $3,518,000
41 Westlake Reed Leskosky $3,300,000
42 FRCH Design Worldwide $3,260,000
43 DLR Group $3,100,000
44 RS&H $2,450,000
45 Corgan $2,413,640
46 Ratio Architects $2,392,817
47 Rosser International $2,371,785
48 Ennead Architects $2,367,000
49 Beyer Blinder Belle $2,235,683
50 Solomon Cordwell Buenz $2,000,000
51 Albert Kahn Associates $2,000,000
52 SchenkelShultz Architecture $1,977,000
53 Integrus Architecture $1,941,923
54 Swanke Hayden Connell Architects $1,843,000
55 Ware Malcomb $1,807,000
56 Shepley Bulfinch $1,760,000
57 LMN Architects $1,678,400
58 Nelson $1,619,612
59 IBI Group ? Gruzen Samton $1,500,000
60 KZF Design $1,448,034
61 Sherlock, Smith & Adams $1,230,000
62 OZ Architecture $1,200,000
63 BRPH $1,190,000
64 Gresham, Smith and Partners $1,071,000
65 Nadel $1,000,000
66 EwingCole $1,000,000
67 Adache Group Architects $875,000
68 P+R Architects $870,123
69 RSP Architects $810,000
70 Fentress Architects $758,040
71 RNL $639,000
72 EDI International $575,101
73 Little $486,000
74 Harvard Jolly Architecture $483,206
75 Harley Ellis Devereaux $480,000
76 SHW Group $407,000
77 Heery International $359,361
78 Sheehan Partners $276,860
79 HMC Architects $274,593
80 PGAL $252,000
81 Cooper Carry $244,714
82 Carrier Johnson + Culture $106,500
83 Lord Aeck Sargent $101,355
84 TK Architects $90,000
85 Wight & Company $85,000
86 FreemanWhite $80,138
87 Mithun $71,200
88 Colkitt & Company $20,000
89 Hoffmann Architects $8,400

 

 

 

Top International Engineering Firms

Rank Company 2013 International Building Revenue
1 Jacobs $6,175,120,000
2 Fluor Corporation $1,991,610,000
3 URS Corp. $1,314,679,005
4 AECOM Technology Corp. $1,138,730,000
5 Parsons Brinckerhoff $1,084,936,001
6 Thornton Tomasetti $37,269,089
7 Arup $37,016,942
8 Burns & McDonnell $30,410,000
9 H&A Architects & Engineers $20,775,000
10 Allen & Shariff $15,126,898
11 WSP Group $12,000,000
12 SSOE Group $11,336,292
13 Rolf Jensen & Associates $7,700,000
14 Magnusson Klemencic Associates $7,601,401
15 M-E Engineers $7,264,800
16 Syska Hennessy Group $6,585,219
17 Simpson Gumpertz & Heger $5,600,000
18 Affiliated Engineers $5,067,000
19 Ross & Baruzzini $4,797,400
20 Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corp. $4,500,000
21 Vanderweil Engineers $4,136,700
22 AKF Group $3,725,000
23 Walter P Moore and Associates $3,705,416
24 Leidos $3,470,000
25 TTG $3,459,770
26 DeSimone Consulting Engineers $2,765,700
27 Interface Engineering $2,659,451
28 TLC Engineering for Architecture $2,552,582
29 Walker Parking Consultants $2,479,817
30 CTLGroup $2,200,000
31 Environmental Systems Design $1,732,272
32 KPFF Consulting Engineers $1,500,000
33 Integrated Design Group $1,023,750
34 Hixson Architecture, Engineering, Interiors $1,000,000
35 Henderson Engineers $870,000
36 Coffman Engineers $800,000
37 Glumac $798,379
38 RMF Engineering $500,000
39 CCRD Partners $425,000
40 Dewberry $400,000
41 Primera Engineers $253,000
42 Paulus, Sokolowski and Sartor $250,000
43 ThermalTech Engineering $230,000
44 Newcomb & Boyd $216,965
45 Mazzetti $166,970
46 Highland Associates $150,000
47 Zak Companies $54,939
48 Sparling $41,524
49 Spectrum Engineers $25,994
50 Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates $9,100
51 Wick Fisher White $4,400

 

 

 

Top International Construction Firms

Rank Company 2013 International Building Revenue
1 Parsons Brinckerhoff $1,084,936,001
2 B. L. Harbert International $504,312,862
3 JLL $305,410,000
4 Structure Tone $295,448,000
5 Hill International $295,000,000
6 Gilbane $264,183,000
7 Walbridge $227,000,000
8 Yates Companies, The $177,000,000
9 Walsh Group, The $150,818,010
10 PCL Construction $91,802,638
11 Lend Lease $75,262,000
12 Barton Malow $62,905,871
13 Turner Construction $39,141,101
14 Alberici Constructors $23,411,539
15 Beck Group, The $17,509,885
16 Haskell $15,300,262
17 Allen & Shariff $15,126,898
18 Shawmut Design and Construction $13,750,000
19 DPR Construction $9,200,000
20 Fortis Construction $8,300,000
21 Astorino $1,745,421
22 Hunt Construction Group $1,000,000
23 Hunt Companies $543,000
24 Heery International $359,361
25 BlueScope Construction $323,025
26 Wight & Company $85,000

 

Read BD+C's full 2014 Giants 300 Report 

Related Stories

| Oct 7, 2013

Reimagining the metal shipping container

With origins tracing back to the mid-1950s, the modern metal shipping container continues to serve as a secure, practical vessel for transporting valuable materials. However, these reusable steel boxes have recently garnered considerable attention from architects and constructors as attractive building materials. 

| Oct 4, 2013

Sydney to get world's tallest 'living' façade

The One Central Park Tower development consists of two, 380-foot-tall towers covered in a series of living walls and vertical gardens that will extend the full height of the buildings. 

| Oct 4, 2013

Nifty video shows planned development of La Sagrada Familia basilica

After 144 years, construction on Gaudi's iconic Barcelona edifice is picking up speed, with a projected end date of 2026. 

| Oct 4, 2013

Mack Urban, AECOM acquire six acres for development in LA's South Park district

Mack Urban and AECOM Capital, the investment fund of AECOM Technology Corporation (NYSE: ACM), have acquired six acres of land in downtown Los Angeles’ South Park district located in the central business district (CBD). 

| Oct 4, 2013

CRB opens Atlanta office

Georgia’s status as a burgeoning hub for the life sciences industry has fueled CRB’s decision to open an office in Atlanta to better serve its clients in the market. CRB is a leading provider of engineering, design and construction services for customers in the biotech, pharmaceutical and life sciences industries. 

| Sep 27, 2013

NYC releases first year-to-year energy performance data on commercial properties

A new report provides information on energy performance of New York City's largest buildings (mostly commercial, multi-family residential). It provides an analysis of 2011 data from city-required energy “benchmarking”—or the tracking and comparison of energy performance—in more than 24,000 buildings that are over 50,000 square feet.

| Sep 27, 2013

ASHRAE/IES publish first standard focused on commissioning process

ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 202, Commissioning Process for Buildings and Systems, identifies the minimum acceptable commissioning process for buildings and systems as described in ASHRAE’s Guideline 0-2005, The Commissioning Process. Standard 202 is ASHRAE’s first standard focused on the commissioning process.

| Sep 26, 2013

6 ways to maximize home-field advantage in sports venue design

Home-field advantage can play a significant role in game outcomes. Here are ways AEC firms can help create the conditions that draw big crowds, energize the home team to perform better, and disrupt visiting players.

| Sep 26, 2013

Literature review affirms benefits of daylighting, architectural glazing

The use of glass as a building material positively impacts learning, healing, productivity and well-being, according to a white paper published by Guardian Industries and the University of Michigan Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning. The findings highlight the significant influence daylighting and outside views have on employees, workers, students, consumers and patients.

| Sep 26, 2013

Mobilizing your job site to achieve a paperless project: fact or fiction?

True mobility in the field has rapidly evolved from lock-box kiosks on each floor to laptops on rolling carts to tablets and iPads loaded with drawings sets stored in the cloud. And WiFi-ready job sites have gone from “nice to have” to “must have” status in just a little over a year.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category

Resiliency

Austin area evacuation center will double as events venue

A new 45,000 sf FEMA-operated evacuation shelter in the Greater Austin metropolitan area will begin construction this fall. The center will be available to house people in the event of a disaster such as a major hurricane and double as an events venue when not needed for emergency shelter.




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021