PwC's latest quarterly analysis reported that the worldwide engineering and construction industries closed 218 merger and acquisition deals in 2014 worth more than $172 billion. The numbers are more than three times greater than 2013's total of $55 billion. Last year was the busiest year for M&A activity since 2007.
There were four mega deals in the fourth quarter of 2014, including one valued at $35 billion. Overall, there were 21 mega deals last year, totaling $127 billion. The greatest number of deals took place in Asia and Oceania.
“Some of the significant year-over-year growth in M&A activity can be attributed to companies seeking to better position themselves for mega projects that not only require a longer commitment of time and capital, but also deeper pools of highly skilled talent,” said H. Kent Goetjen, U.S. engineering and construction leader at PwC. “The lack of available talent, which is being fueled in the U.S. by the retirement of the baby boomer generation, is driving up the price of acquisitions and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future.”
PwC analysts are monitoring several other trends that are expected to affect the values and locations of deals in the engineering and construction sector, including:
• The integration of design and consultancy firms with construction companies is well under way as the E&C industry continues to move toward full service integration. Firms are generally looking to leverage higher-value added services, such as design, while balancing out their regional exposure.
• A major driver of consolidation is talent needs, as companies compete for specialized technical expertise in high-demand segments. As an alternative to acquiring expertise, some companies are embarking upon joint ventures, but these are complicated and add significant operational risk to any project. Companies are positioning themselves to bid on larger, increasingly complex projects with new partners and non-traditional sources of funding.
• A flurry of smaller, local deals took place, particularly within Asia. Cross-border activity dropped to 22% of the total in the quarter, with most local activity occurring in Asia.
• Cement oversupply and tepid demand continue to plague the industry. Top players, in an attempt to maintain their market share and margin, continue to acquire smaller companies post-merger announcement of Holcim and Lafarge.
• The consolidation in Asia was not limited to the construction materials segment, and not all driven by overcapacity, as all segments of E&C experienced a pick-up in local consolidation. The uncertain economic outlook in China raises many concerns for inbound activity in Asia but does not seem to be hindering deal activity in the region.
Related Stories
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Office Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. office building sector
Gensler, Jacobs, and STO Building Group head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest office building sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Hotel Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. hospitality sector
Gensler, Jacobs, and Suffolk Construction top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest hotel sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Healthcare Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. healthcare facilities sector
HDR, Jacobs, and Turner top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest healthcare facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Government Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. government buildings sector
HNTB, Jacobs, and Turner top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest government sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Cultural Facilities Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. cultural facilities sector
AECOM, Arup, and Populous head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest cultural facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 2, 2020
2020 Retail Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. retail building sector
Gensler, Jacobs, and PCL Construction top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest retail sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 2, 2020
2020 University Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the higher education sector
Gensler, AECOM, and Turner Construction top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest university sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 2, 2020
2020 Multifamily Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. multifamily building sector
Clark Group, Humphreys & Partners Architects, and Kimley-Horn head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest multifamily building sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 2, 2020
2020 Airport Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. airport facilities sector
AECOM, Hensel Phelps, and PGAL top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest airport sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Nov 29, 2020
Top 40 Engineering Architecture Firms for 2020
Jacobs, AECOM, and Kimley-Horn top the rankings of the nation's largest engineering architecture (EA) firms for nonresidential buildings and multifamily buildings work, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2020 Giants 400 Report.