flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Putting the Metal to the Petal

Putting the Metal to the Petal

Steel construction using BIM enabled the Holocaust and Human Rights Center of Maine's flowering design to be constructed on time and within budget.


By By Jay W. Schneider, Senior Editor | August 11, 2010
This article first appeared in the 200909 issue of BD+C.
Design for the Holocaust and Human Rights Center of Maine is representative
of a flower in bloom, complete with petals that shelter the circular exhibit space. The center connects to the Bennett Katz Library.
Photos: Shepley Bullfinch

The Holocaust and Human Rights Center of Maine was founded in 1985, but the organization didn't have a permanent home until May 2008. That's when the Michael Klahr Center, which houses the HHRC, opened on the Augusta campus of the University of Maine.

The design, by Boston-based architects Shepley Bulfinch Richardson & Abbott, was selected from among more than 200 entries in a university-sponsored competition. The winning project, a conceptualized flower in bloom, was created by a group of young architects at Shepley Bulfinch who imagined four petal-like forms growing out of the ground—symbolic of the seeds of democracy and freedom.

“There are still so many human rights issues out there today, so the flower blossoms are representative of new life coming back when conditions are right,” says Angela Watson, a principal at Shepley Bulfinch and mentor to the young architects.

The Building Team utilized BIM to check the demands and capabilities of
the petal forms and determine the proper petal radii, which cut the cost
of bending the shell steel by half. The finished petals are clad in copper.

It was Watson who introduced the HHRC project to the firm. When she learned of the University of Maine's design competition back in 2004, she organized a separate in-house competition as a way to give the firm's young bloods a chance to “flex their design muscles,” as she put it. The entire firm voted, and the two winning designs were entered in the HHRC competition, with one taking the prize.

At 6,300 sf, the Michael Klahr Center isn't a large building. The space is apportioned throughout a single level that includes a circular exhibit space in the center as well as offices and education space. However, its sculptural forms were complex enough for the Building Team, which included structural engineer Simpson Gumpertz and Heger of Waltham, Mass., to experiment with BIM.

Not a big deal now, but BIM was fairly new in 2004 when design began, turning this project into a BIM pilot for Shepley Bulfinch. The Building Team used BIM to explore many different construction options, including cast-in-place concrete, glulam wood beams, and steel. They found that cast-in-place would push the project over the $1.8 million budget cap and glulam would make the petals too thick. Their BIM model helped them decide that steel framework was the most efficient and economical solution.

Steel construction enabled some portions of the building to be shop fabricated, which saved time. General contractor Wright-Ryan Construction, Portland, Maine, cut construction time even more by framing large portions of the small building using wide-flange noncomposite steel beams and columns, with the lateral load system consisting of structural steel concentrically braced frames with hollow structural section (HSS) brace members.

But it was the complex design of the steel petals that really tested the Building Team's mettle.

The SGH structural engineering team developed an innovative structural system that consisted of a grid of HSS sections using curved HSS 8x8s as the ribs along the meridians of the spherical sections of the petals and straight HSS 4x4s along the parallels of latitude of the pedals. The HSS grids, braced and moment-connected in-plane, allowed the petals to act as shells. Three-inch-diameter structural steel columns pierced the petals and provided additional structural support. The BIM model enabled the team to check the demands and capabilities of the petals and determine the proper petal radii, which cut the cost of bending the shell steel by half.

Wood-framed box beams (made of 2x4s and plywood) were incorporated into the spans between the rib framing; this allowed the four petals to be sheathed in plywood, over which the standing seam copper roof panels were installed.

“This building is the perfect story,” says Watson. “It's a unique design from a young, talented team that overcame challenges of budget, schedule, and material and created a place that will have lasting impact.”

Related Stories

| Jul 25, 2014

Philip Johnson’s 'Tent of Tomorrow' vandalized, damaged with fire

Vandals set fire to a stolen van in the park, which in turn caught the tarp covering the pavilion's 50-year old Terrazzo Map on fire.

| Jul 23, 2014

Architecture Billings Index up nearly a point in June

AIA reported the June ABI score was 53.5, up from a mark of 52.6 in May.

| Jul 21, 2014

Economists ponder uneven recovery, weigh benefits of big infrastructure [2014 Giants 300 Report]

According to expert forecasters, multifamily projects, the Panama Canal expansion, and the petroleum industry’s “shale gale” could be saving graces for commercial AEC firms seeking growth opportunities in an economy that’s provided its share of recent disappointments.

| Jul 18, 2014

Contractors warm up to new technologies, invent new management schemes [2014 Giants 300 Report]

“UAV.” “LATISTA.” “CMST.” If BD+C Giants 300 contractors have anything to say about it, these new terms may someday be as well known as “BIM” or “LEED.” Here’s a sampling of what Giant GCs and CMs are doing by way of technological and managerial innovation.

| Jul 18, 2014

Top Construction Management Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Jacobs, Barton Malow, Hill International top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest construction management and project management firms in the United States. 

| Jul 18, 2014

Top Contractors [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Turner, Whiting-Turner, Skanska top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest contractors in the United States. 

| Jul 18, 2014

Engineering firms look to bolster growth through new services, technology [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Following solid revenue growth in 2013, the majority of U.S.-based engineering and engineering/architecture firms expect more of the same this year, according to BD+C’s 2014 Giants 300 report. 

| Jul 18, 2014

Top Engineering/Architecture Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Jacobs, AECOM, Parsons Brinckerhoff top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest engineering/architecture firms in the United States.

| Jul 18, 2014

Top Engineering Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Fluor, Arup, Day & Zimmermann top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest engineering firms in the United States.

| Jul 18, 2014

Top Architecture Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Gensler, Perkins+Will, NBBJ top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest architecture firms in the United States. 

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category


Adaptive Reuse

Detroit’s Michigan Central Station, centerpiece of innovation hub, opens

The recently opened Michigan Central Station in Detroit is the centerpiece of a 30-acre technology and cultural hub that will include development of urban transportation solutions. The six-year adaptive reuse project of the 640,000 sf historic station, created by the same architect as New York’s Grand Central Station, is the latest sign of a reinvigorating Detroit.


Museums

Connecticut’s Bruce Museum more than doubles its size with a 42,000-sf, three-floor addition

In Greenwich, Conn., the Bruce Museum, a multidisciplinary institution highlighting art, science, and history, has undergone a campus revitalization and expansion that more than doubles the museum’s size. Designed by EskewDumezRipple and built by Turner Construction, the project includes a 42,000-sf, three-floor addition as well as a comprehensive renovation of the 32,500-sf museum, which was originally built as a private home in the mid-19th century and expanded in the early 1990s. 


halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021

Â