In 2007, the seemingly new term Integrated Project Delivery (IPD) was making its way through the inner circles of contractors, architects and owners. IPD was developed as a method to enhance lagging efficiencies in the construction industry. During this time, it was no secret that major capital projects were a high risk endeavor, potentially wrought with problems, cost overruns, finger pointing and backstabbing. Furthermore, relationships began quickly deteriorating, problems ensued and the building owners were left holding the bag.
IPD was the method that was going to transform the construction industry into a model of efficiency and teamwork. Now, after approximately seven years, many of the “beta test” projects have been completed using the IPD Model. What have we learned? And is it truly a transformative delivery model?
Is it relational?
IPD is billed as being a relational delivery method due to the Integrated Form of Agreement (IFOA) or tri-party contract which provides financial incentive to mitigate risk. This is a true statement from a contracting stance. Many IPD contracts are developed to hold the project team members accountable when dealing with project risks.
This is helpful to the lower tiered subcontractors and consultants who, in a traditional process, would usually bear the most risk in project issues. In an IPD process, teams are incentivized by dealing with these issues quickly in order to get them completed in the most efficient and cost-effective manner. If this doesn’t happen, it will increase costs which will in turn increase risks to their own incentives and profits.
Regardless of the delivery model, it is still impossible to contract trust. What held true in a traditional project still holds true in IPD. Teams must be able to trust one another. The IPD team could possibly be the biggest factor in determining the success of a project. CBRE Healthcare has facilitated engagements where contractors, architects and owners believe they are ready for IPD only to find themselves slipping right back into traditional project delivery methods. Just saying you are using IPD does not make it true. The attitude and culture must be sincere to ensure success.
Is it collaborative?
For most project teams, collaboration is one of the biggest changes and challenges from a traditional method. Architects and planners no longer act alone in the early design process. Contractors find themselves participating in conversations from the design intent of a patient room to a clock's location on a given wall. Initially, this interaction can be awkward and tricky. Establishing a process early in the initiation phase will ensure team members are acclimated to their new roles and are confident in their participation. Architects and contractors come to rely on the new partnership that fosters accountability within the parameters that have been established.
Is it Lean?
IPD was initially born out of Lean Methodologies. The main element of Lean that applies to IPD is the elimination of waste and duplication. One objective in eliminating waste is to avoid multiple entities creating different iterations of the same drawing. Building Information Modeling (BIM) is a useful tool in achieving this goal.
Imagine for a moment the traditional design to final product process. First, a designer creates a set of drawings and specifications for a design element. Then, it’s sent to a contractor(s) and they establish a price on the design. Next, the contractor must send a set of drawings and information back to the designer (known as a submittal) to be checked for accuracy and to ensure the contractor understands the design. Rarely does the submittal process end there. For a variety of reasons, there are usually changes and redesign. This means more drawing iterations, detail changes and mistakes.
The use of BIM in construction is revolutionizing the industry and combined with IPD it drastically improves the process as the designer and contractor are in one room working on the same building element. This allows for timely modifications due to design changes/enhancements or correcting design clashes/conflicts all while never changing “hands” or being printed.
Thanks to this process, when the final design is complete, the confidence level is extremely high, leading to another revolution in the construction industry: pre-manufacturing. Many other types of Lean Methodologies are seeing enormous success within construction in general. Combining Lean Methodologies with IPD makes for an even better process.
What Have We Learned?
Having been involved in numerous IPD projects, we have found that there are many factors that can impact success. Some of the most important, whether structured through an IFOA or merely operating in a collaborative environment (IPD “lite”), are team selection, team member experience, managing team member involvement and project size.
In order to have success on any project, specifically IPD, properly implementing the launch phase is critical. Owners not aligned in their overall strategies risk potential delays and setbacks. Probably, the most important step at this phase is team selection. A well-thought-out Request for Integrated Team (RFIT) will go a long way to ensuring success.
One of the key elements of the RFIT process is allowing teams to self-select/assemble. Though this concept may seem foreign, it provides owners confidence in knowing that their selected team has a history of working together, is aligned along common goals, and has a culture conducive to collaboration. We have seen it time and again: forced marriages rarely produce desired outcomes. Therefore, it is important for the owners to abandon past practices and external influences to enable the best team to rise to the top.
It is also a good idea to have a series of planned interactions with the top candidates prior to awarding the project. This will allow the owner to determine if each team can truly deliver on their claims and work well together. For example, the top candidates can evaluate the current program elements/budget and present their findings as a part of the selection process. Don’t set up anything too specific. Challenge the teams to identify solutions and not merely react to a set of guidelines.
A legitimate concern that most have upon engaging in IPD is whether the team truly has the required knowledge base to deliver the project. It seems these days that everyone claims to have IPD experience. But just saying so doesn’t make it true.
While architects and prime contractors may be well-versed in IPD methodology, subcontractors and consultants may not have the necessary experience and could potentially be a burden to the team. Be sure to truly investigate team claims and talk to references. Specifically ask about the collaborative nature of the team and their interactions with the referring staff. The contractors with the most experience will have developed a team of subs with whom they have proven success.
Contractors have found themselves in a much expanded role due to IPD. Their involvement has greatly increased as they are now engaged at the onset of the project. While this absolutely has value to the end result, ensuring a balance in their involvement is paramount to successfully transitioning from design to construction. The contractor is a large contributor in the success of maintaining IPD through the construction phase. If their commitment fades, it will inevitably lead projects back down a traditional delivery path.
And finally, not only does IPD work on large capital projects, but it can benefit small projects as well. During the early IPD days, it was noted that the process would only work on large construction projects. This was mainly due to the insurance structure that was required. Additionally, it was thought the early investment in resources from the contractor would not be cost-effective on a small project. However, we are seeing IPD implemented on smaller projects, and it’s a real testament to the fact that early investment in planning can pay off with any project. Contractors, and more importantly subcontractors, are finding value in the fact that they no longer have to budget for potential risk.
Conclusion
Recently, CBRE Healthcare polled participants of an ongoing project to determine how many team members had actually been involved in an IPD project. Interestingly enough, three team members were not even familiar with the traditional approach as they had never worked on anything but IPD projects. The construction industry is experiencing a paradigm shift. Owners are now realizing the benefits of Lean philosophies and IPD is the approach that delivers results. As the initial IPD projects come to completion, significant success stories are being communicated.
Capital project delivery methods may still have a ways to go in achieving efficiency, but, as the industry continues to evolve, we believe IPD is a step in the right direction. Everything is changing in project delivery. Are you onboard?
Related Stories
Green | Apr 21, 2023
Top 10 green building projects for 2023
The Harvard University Science and Engineering Complex in Boston and the Westwood Hills Nature Center in St. Louis are among the AIA COTE Top Ten Awards honorees for 2023.
Multifamily Housing | Apr 19, 2023
Austin’s historic Rainey Street welcomes a new neighbor: a 48-story mixed-used residential tower
Austin’s historic Rainey Street is welcoming a new neighbor. The Paseo, a 48-story mixed-used residential tower, will bring 557 apartments and two levels of retail to the popular Austin entertainment district, known for houses that have been converted into bungalow bars and restaurants.
Design Innovation Report | Apr 19, 2023
Reinforced concrete walls and fins stiffen and shade the National Bank of Kuwait skyscraper
When the National Bank of Kuwait first conceived its new headquarters more than a decade ago, it wanted to make a statement about passive design with a soaring tower that could withstand the extreme heat of Kuwait City, the country’s desert capital.
Design Innovation Report | Apr 19, 2023
HDR uses artificial intelligence tools to help design a vital health clinic in India
Architects from HDR worked pro bono with iKure, a technology-centric healthcare provider, to build a healthcare clinic in rural India.
Design Innovation Report | Apr 19, 2023
Meet The Hithe: A demountable building for transient startups
The Hithe, near London, is designed to be demountable and reusable. The 2,153-sf building provides 12 units of business incubator workspace for startups.
Metals | Apr 19, 2023
Sherwin-Williams Coil Coatings releases new color forecast for architectural metal coatings
The Coil Coatings division of Sherwin-Williams has released its latest color forecast, FUSE, for architectural metal coatings. The report aims to inspire architects, product manufacturers and original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) in the coil and extrusion market over the next 3-5 years and beyond.
Airports | Apr 18, 2023
India's mammoth new airport terminal takes ‘back to nature’ seriously
On January 15, 2023, Phase 1 of the Kempegowda International Airport’s Terminal 2, in Bengaluru, India, began domestic operations. The 2.75 million-sf building, designed by Skidmore, Owings & Merrill (SOM), is projected to process 25 million passengers annually, while providing its travelers with a healthier environment, thanks to extensive indoor-outdoor landscaping that offers serenity to what is normally a frenzied experience.
Resiliency | Apr 18, 2023
AI-simulated hurricanes could aid in designing more resilient buildings
Researchers at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have devised a new method of digitally simulating hurricanes in an effort to create more resilient buildings. A recent study asserts that the simulations can accurately represent the trajectory and wind speeds of a collection of actual storms.
Green | Apr 18, 2023
USGBC and IWBI unveil streamlined certification pathway for LEED and WELL green building programs
The U.S. Green Building Council, Green Business Certification Inc., and the International WELL Building Institute released a streamlined process for projects pursuing certifications for the LEED green building rating system and the WELL Building Standard. The new protocol simplifies documentation for projects that are pursuing both certifications at the same time or that have already earned one certification and are looking to add the other.
K-12 Schools | Apr 18, 2023
ASHRAE offers indoor air quality guide for schools
The American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE) has released a guide for educators, administrators, and school districts on indoor air quality. The guide can be used as a tool to discuss options to improve indoor air quality based on existing HVAC equipment, regional objectives, and available funding.