In the nearly five decades since its founding, in 1969, HMFH Architects, Cambridge, Mass., has established itself as one of the leading education-sector design firms in New England. The 45-person firm does its share of university work, but Pre-K to Grade 12 is its bread and butter. HMFH-designed schools dot the landscape from Rhode Island to New Hampshire, with the heaviest swath cutting through Boston and environs.
HMFH has been an innovator in K-12 work, using design to bring communities into the schools, mix vocational and academic programs in a single building, and experiment with nontraditional grade configurations. The firm has designed schools with fabrication labs and maker spaces. It is known for the joyous use of color in its K-12s.Â
A few years ago, the superintendent of a client school district described the concerns being raised by the teaching staff: Having to use the cafeteria for large-scale, hands-on activities. Students sitting on the floor in the corridors to work on group projects. Insufficient space in school libraries for big, collaborative activities. No place to properly display completed work.
The client challenged HMFH Senior Principal Laura Wernick, FAIA, REFP, LEED AP, and her colleagues to consider a radical proposition: learning happens everywhere, not just in the traditional classroom or school library. It was time for a fresh look at how spaces in schools could be used to encourage new learning modalities in elementary education.
HMFH picked up the gauntlet and designed three elementary schools based on the premise that project-based activities promote engagement, critical thinking, creativity, and collaboration.
The physical outcome of the design process was a learning commons in the core of each of the three new schools. Each commons was a collection of interconnected spaces:
Project areas equipped with sinks, storage areas, and flexible seating could be used for large-scale activities (book making, science projects). These works-in-progress could be left up for several days at a time.Â
Amphitheaters for student skits, guest speakers, or large-group discussions.
Storytelling rooms to host quiet reading or âbuddy reading,â where older students read to their young charges.
Breakout spaces for individual students to catch up on work, or for small-group work under teacher supervision. Special-needs teachers could use these spaces for isolated one-on-one support with a child. The breakout spaces are located between every pair of classrooms and also open into the learning commons.
A media space, a book-collections room, and spaces with dedicated resources for reading, speech, and other special needs were also provided. Traditional classrooms surround the commons.
Â
Project area in an HMFH-designed school, one of three that were the subject of a post-occupancy evaluation. Response to the learning commons from educators was âoverwhelmingly positive,â but there was room for improvement. Photo: Ed Wonsek.Â
Â
HMFH also relied on research that showed physical movement to be integral to learning. Providing a variety of spaces would get students up off their duffs and moving around. A change in environment for loud, hands-on activities would, it was believed, help students recalibrate on a topic and find a new focus for the work at hand.
The three schoolsâtwo K-5s and a Pre-K-2âopened in 2013, but HMFH was not done with them. Last spring, the firm hired an outside research firm, Community Circle, Lexington, Mass., to conduct a post-occupancy evaluation to determine what was working well, what could work better in the learning commonsâinformation that the firm hoped would help it design even better learning commons in the future.
The consultant, Daphne Politis, AICP, a city planner and architectural studies professional, conducted written surveys and interviews with teachers, principals, and specialty educators. She observed how the spaces were being used at each school for a full day.
Her 97-page report confirmed the validity of many of the premises on which HMFH based its designs for the learning commons. But the research also unveiled a number of small surprisesâand one big oneâthat will inform HMFHâs work in the future.
Â
passing WITH FLYING COLORS
The chief finding of the POE report: the response to the learning commons was âoverwhelmingly positive.â The project areas were the most used, and the story rooms proved to be a big hit. âI love the learning commons,â said one teacher. âWe are so lucky.â Teachers liked the variety of spaces, especially for small-group projects and âalternative spacesâ for âspecial activities.âÂ
But noise and visual distraction created by the more open environment were cited as negatives by many teachers and principals. âThe noise level from the learning commons areas can be an issue for the surrounding classrooms and office spaces,â said one faculty member. A second-grade teacher said, âIt is a little too open. We sometimes have small staff meetings in the project areas. If we as adults canât focus, I know the kids canât focus.â
Some teachers suggested putting in physical partitions; others said that would spoil the openness of the project areas.
Other key findings:
⢠Most teachers used the spaces that were closest to their classrooms, regardless of design intent or the ability of the space to support a specific type of activity. This was particularly true for teachers of younger children, who felt the need to keep an eye on their students.
⢠The need for supervision was greater than anticipated. Teachers expressed concern that their charges were spending too much time playing games on their iPads (all students had them), not enough on the subject matter. âThe younger kids cannot be left alone,â one teacher said. âIt is our responsibility to supervise them.â
⢠Project areas were deemed too small by some teachers who wanted to be able to take the entire class into the space so they could keep an eye on all their children.
⢠More innovative uses of the spaces evolved over time as principals encouraged teachers to experiment, and teachers observed how others were using the spaces.
⢠Teachers really got into the weeds with suggestions: âMore storage.â âPut Eno boards in all spaces.â âProvide a mix of child-sized and adult furniture.â âDonât put the amphitheaters in the center of the learning commons.â âBetter sight lines.â
Â
Circular reading room. Photo: Ed Wonsek / Courtesy HMFHÂ Architects.
Â
The big surprise of the studyâand itâs a good lesson in why POEs can be so valuableâis how student demographics affected the use of the learning commons. In two of the schools, spaces designed for group learning were being used for collaboration, particularly by âhigh-functioningâ and older children. In the third school, which had the highest level of special-needs students and English language learners, collaborative spaces were being devoted to one-on-one tutoring, calming a student, or providing a quiet space in which to focus.
Even though these spaces were not being used primarily as designed, âthey were still deemed useful,â the consultant stated in her report. But she also recommended providing adequate spaces for special-needs learners and one-on-one tutoring so that faculty didnât feel compelled to use breakout rooms for such purposes, rather than for their intended use.
Â
LOOK BACK AT YOUR WORK
The HMFH study reminds me of something I asked three years ago in an editorial (http://bit.ly/2aHM1gs): Why arenât more AEC firms doing POEs? I suggested that Building Teams need to make a regular practice of going back to their projects to see how well theyâre working: Did you get the indoor comfort right? Howâs the daylighting? Are the occupants satisfied? A site visit should be the minimum. An armâs-length POE conducted by an outside consultant, like the one HMFH did, would be the ideal.
Wernick and her colleagues stuck their necks out by commissioning the POE, but they learned some valuable lessons in the processâlessons they would never have garnered without the research. Thanks to that enlightenment, the firm will design even better learning commons in the future.Â
Â
First-floor plan shows the position of the learning commons vis Ă vis classrooms (âCRâ ). âWe want our students to be able to spread out,â said one principal. Image courtesy HMFH Architects.
Related Stories
| Jan 22, 2014
SOM-designed University Center uses 'sky quads,' stacked staircases to promote chance encounters
The New School's vertical campus in Manhattan houses multiple functions, including labs, design studios, a library, and student residences, in a 16-story building. Â
| Jan 17, 2014
The Starchitect of Oz: New Gehry building in Sydney celebrates topping out
The Dr. Chau Chak Wing Building at the University of Technology, Sydney, will mark Frank Gehry's debut project in the Australian metro.
| Jan 15, 2014
Report: 32 U.S. buildings have been verified as net-zero energy performers
The New Buildings Institute's 2014 Getting to Zero Status report includes an interactive map detailing the net-zero energy buildings that have been verified by NBI.Â
| Jan 13, 2014
Custom exterior fabricator A. Zahner unveils free façade design software for architects
The web-based tool uses the company's factory floor like "a massive rapid prototype machine,â allowing designers to manipulate designs on the fly based on cost and other factors, according to CEO/President Bill Zahner.
| Jan 13, 2014
AEC professionals weigh in on school security
An exclusive survey reveals that Building Teams are doing their part to make the nationâs schools safer in the aftermath of the Sandy Hook tragedy.
| Jan 11, 2014
Getting to net-zero energy with brick masonry construction [AIA course]
When targeting net-zero energy performance, AEC professionals are advised to tackle energy demand first. This AIA course covers brick masonry's role in reducing energy consumption in buildings.Â
| Jan 10, 2014
What the states should do to prevent more school shootings
To tell the truth, I didnât want to write about the terrible events of December 14, 2012, when 20 children and six adults were gunned down at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn. I figured other media would provide ample coverage, and anything we did would look cheap or inappropriate. But two things turned me around.
| Jan 10, 2014
Special Report: K-12 school security in the wake of Sandy Hook
BD+C's exclusive five-part report on K-12 school security offers proven design advice, technology recommendations, and thoughtful commentary on how Building Teams can help school districts prevent, or at least mitigate, a Sandy Hook on their turf.
| Jan 9, 2014
How security in schools applies to other building types
Many of the principles and concepts described in our Special Report on K-12 security also apply to other building types and markets.
| Jan 9, 2014
16 recommendations on security technology to take to your K-12 clients
From facial recognition cameras to IP-based door hardware, here are key technology-related considerations you should discuss with your school district clients.