The Falls Center redevelopment gave new life to the historic former Women’s Medical College of Pennsylvania, the country’s first medical school for women. The complex’s original hospital facility, the Heritage Building, was designed by Philadelphia-based architecture firm Ritter and Shay and built in 1929.
In a bind, six years ago the building owners approached development and investment firm Iron Stone Real Estate Group with an offer to buy the property.
“We liked the layout, parking, and hospital-grade infrastructure of the building,” says Jason Friedland, director of operations and investment at Iron Stone. “We believed that at our entry basis we could withstand a long lease-up and offer a better-priced finished product for medical and educational tenants than our competitors.”
Within two weeks, Iron Stone acquired the former Women’s Medical College campus for $10 million. Along with Building Team members Wulff Architects, Axis Construction, Morrissey Design, Digenova Sam Inc., Direct Air Design and Build, Mirarchi Brothers, and Bofinger Plumbing Contractors, Iron Stone recasted the Heritage Building into a modern structure.
Finding the funding
IIn 2007, Iron Stone was granted zoning approval to revamp the 700,000-sf historic site into a mixed-use development. Phase one was the commercial development of medical offices, light manufacturing, and retail; phase two incorporated 132 residential units.
Before phase two got off the ground, the 2008 economic slump put the entire project at a standstill. As a partially completed commercial real estate development with an expiring bridge construction loan, the project was in jeopardy.
“Even though we had strong demand and several signed leases from institutional not-for-profit and educational tenants, at times we were unable to procure construction financing,” recalls Friedland. In the absence of conventional financing, Iron Stone used the cash infusion from its historic tax credit investors to bridge construction financing gaps for tenant improvements.
Iron Stone brought in Chevron Corp. as an equity investor in the historic tax credits as well as additional private investors, and put a condominium regime in place. This tactic allowed for individual construction loans and mortgages for each building as opposed to a single loan for the whole campus. This financing structure allowed residential-phase development to commence again.
Financing markets were still tight, however, and the possibility of a speculative market development was ruled out. At the same time, Philadelphia University, whose main campus is a mile down the road from the Heritage Building, was experiencing a boom. Because of the influx the university was housing students at scattered sites that weren’t up to par. The proximity of the Heritage Building, the already-developed apartment unit plans, and the site’s history made it a perfect place for a dormitory. Philadelphia University signed a lease in July 2010.
PROJECT SUMMARY
Falls Center, Heritage Building, Philadelphia
Building Team
Owner/Developer: Iron Stone Real Estate Group
Architect: Wulff Architects Inc.
Interior Architect: Morrissey Design LLC
Structural Engineer: Digenova Sam Inc.
Mechanical Engineer: Direct Air-Design and Build
Electrical Engineer: Mirarchi Brothers Inc.-Design and Build
Plumbing Enginner: Bofinger Plumbing Contractors LLC
General Contractor: Axis Construction Management LLCGeneral Information
Size: 160,000 sf
Construction Cost: $14.7 million
Construction Period: September 2010 to July 2011
Delivery Method: Stipulated Sum
Because the school was on a set schedule, the Building Team had only 10 months to finish the apartments. If not, Iron Stone would have to foot the bill for 300 students to stay in hotels.
Plowing through eight decades of history
When Iron Stone acquired the property, it had to organize the immense number of construction documents and blueprints housed in a storage closet. The original Heritage Building contained laboratories, exam rooms, human and animal morgues, administrative offices, nursing facilities, classrooms, and an auditorium. Moreover, previous hospital administrations had made several renovations. The Building Team sought to reuse as much of the existing infrastructure as possible; ultimately, 78% of the material removed from the site was salvaged or recycled.
Preconstruction and initial demolition started before the lease with the university was signed, which turned out to be a blessing in disguise. There was more asbestos in the building than anticipated, and it had to be remediated before demolition could begin. Original flooring, doors, and HVAC systems also had to be removed before this step, all the while carefully saving the interior walls for historic preservation purposes.
Exterior work included a complete roof replacement, partial repointing of the brick façade, and replacement of the windows, which were aluminum or wood. In order to keep the windows in compliance with the National Parks Service standards, the Building Team surveyed nearly 600 units to catalogue their configurations. For each of the four window types found in the building, a modern replica replacement was found.
Fortunately, when the commercial phase of the Heritage Building was developed two years prior, a new water-source loop air-conditioning system had already been installed and was easily expanded to the residential portion of the development. The electrical infrastructure was built from scratch and a new network of copper water supply lines was installed, but the existing sprinkler system and elevators only needed minor improvements. The Building Team also chose a spray insulation made from soybeans, which naturally provides a vapor barrier, to replace the mineral wool batts.
A contemporary loft aesthetic was chosen for the units, with neutral colors, exposed original brick walls, high ceilings, and large windows. A few of the units were lined with windows, originally to provide sunlight to tuberculosis sufferers. Slate windowsills and thirty-degree ceiling angles, which were characteristic of hospital design in 1929, were also preserved. Many of the original eight-foot corridors were saved, as were the original wood railings and soapstone treads in the stairways.
“Convincing the design professionals that several of the existing systems could be tweaked and reused instead of tearing everything out and starting from scratch was a challenge,” says Friedland. “But this savings was significant and helped us to attract price-sensitive tenants during the financial crisis.”
The lobby was the last piece of the puzzle for the Building Team to put into place. To restore it to its original condition, the team used marble to replace the 12-inch ceramic floor tiles, the aluminum revolving door was removed, original paint colors were matched, and a bas-relief in the entrance was preserved.
The demolition of the lobby also led to an unexpected discovery—a time capsule that had been buried in June 1930, The contents were donated to The Legacy Center: Archives & Spelcial Collections at Drexel University College of Medicine and act as a poignant reminder of the building’s place in local history.
Construction on the new Heritage Building was completed ahead of schedule and under budget. The building now has a new purpose, but continues to educate Philadelphia students. +
Related Stories
| Jun 28, 2013
Calculating the ROI of building enclosure commissioning
A researcher at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory calls building enclosure commissioning “the single-most cost-effective strategy for reducing energy, costs, and greenhouse gas emissions in buildings today.”
| Jun 28, 2013
A brief history of windows in America
Historic window experts from Hoffmann Architects look back at the origin of windows in the U.S.
| Jun 28, 2013
Building owners cite BIM/VDC as 'most exciting trend' in facilities management, says Mortenson report
A recent survey of more than 60 building owners and facility management professionals by Mortenson Construction shows that BIM/VDC is top of mind among owner professionals.
| Jun 27, 2013
Thermal, solar control designs can impact cooling loads by 200%, heating loads by 30%
Underestimating thermal bridging can greatly undermine a building’s performance contributing to heating load variances of up to 30% and cooling load variances of up to 200%, says the MMM Group.
| Jun 26, 2013
New York’s ‘Scaffold Law’ may be altered to place larger burden on workers
New York's Scaffold Law, which “places the burden of responsibility on the contractor to prove that the job site was safe for workers,” could be facing a major change.
| Jun 26, 2013
Commercial real estate execs eye multifamily, retail sectors for growth, says KPMG report
The multifamily, retail, and hospitality sectors are expected to lead commercial building growth, according to the 2013 KPMG Commercial Real Estate Outlook Survey.
| Jun 25, 2013
Mirvish, Gehry revise plans for triad of Toronto towers
A trio of mixed-use towers planned for an urban redevelopment project in Toronto has been redesigned by planners David Mirvish and Frank Gehry. The plan was announced last October but has recently been substantially revised.
| Jun 25, 2013
First look: Herzog & de Meuron's Jade Signature condo tower in Florida
Real estate developer Fortune International has released details of its new Jade Signature property, to be developed in Sunny Isles Beach near Miami. The luxury waterfront condo building will include 192 units in a 57-story building near high-end retail destinations and cultural venues.
| Jun 25, 2013
DC commission approves Gehry's redesign for Eisenhower memorial
Frank Gehry's updated for a new Dwight D. Eisenhower memorial in Washington, D.C., has been approved by the Eisenhower Memorial Commission, reports the Washington Post. The commission voted unanimously to approve the $110 million project, which has been gestating for 14 years.
| Jun 21, 2013
AIA report: Greater collaboration, stiffer competition among top trends in architecture
A new 34-page report from AIA highlights key trends in the architecture marketplace and their impact on business and growth.
