flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Passive House standard gaining influence in commercial sector

Codes and Standards

Passive House standard gaining influence in commercial sector

Some industry watchers predict it will become the base building code. 


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | December 1, 2016

Courtesy of calderoliver, Wikimedia Commons

The Passive House standard will become the base building code for commercial construction, and is having influence in the residential arena, according to some industry observers. 

Critics have questioned whether Passive House makes sense on certain commercial and institutional applications such as multi-family and college housing. If occupants are not committed to saving energy, they argue, the benefits of the standard could be negated. If residents leave lights on and windows open, for example, the premium to build to the standard would not pay off.

Nevertheless, proponents say building with continuity in the thermal barrier makes a building more likely to prove its value in the long run. Furthermore, up to 30% of greenhouse gas emissions could be eliminated is Passive House standards are implemented widely. 

One advocate said there is an average premium of about 5% in construction costs—a figure that is likely to decline. In a possible sign of things to come, Massachusetts has already included PHIUS+2015 standards as an alternative compliance path to prescriptive requirements in the 2015 International Energy Conservation Code. Other states are expected to follow suit.

Related Stories

| May 19, 2014

Construction skilled-worker shortage causing rise in claims

The improved economy has boosted construction starts, but a shortage of experienced trade workers has led to more on-the-job injuries and construction defects.

| May 15, 2014

AISC Prequalified Seismic Moment Connection standard update now available

The AISC standard Prequalified Moment Connections for Special and Intermediate Steel Moment Frames for Seismic Applications (ANSI/AISC 358-10) has been updated with a second supplement, ANSI/AISC 358s2-14.

| May 15, 2014

ConsensusDocs releases new agreements for contractors who hire consultants

ConsensusDocs has released the new ConsensusDocs 746 Constructor & Geotechnical Consultant Agreement and the 747 Constructor & Consultant Agreement.

| May 8, 2014

Report: Top storm-resilient cities have high adaptive capacity

The most resilient cities in the world, including five in the U.S., have attributes that would enable them to recover better than others from devastating natural disasters.

| May 8, 2014

LED lighting helps cities receive Energy Star designation

Thanks largely to an ambitious program to boost the use of LED lighting in its buildings, Los Angeles is the top ranked U.S. city on the Environmental Protection Agency’s annual list of U.S. cities that are doing the most to improve energy efficiency.

| May 8, 2014

Door knob code revisions generating controversy

The City of Vancouver’s ban on doorknobs in all new buildings, which went into effect last month, has drawn a strong reaction from the public and heated debate across Canada as other jurisdictions consider the measure.

| May 8, 2014

Structural concrete code revisions open for public comments

The American Concrete Institute’s completely reorganized ACI 318-14, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary,” is open for public review for a 45-day period.

| May 3, 2014

Controversy rages over cost, benefits of proposed OSHA silica dust rule

Introduced in August 2013, the proposal would lower allowable levels of crystalline silica in all workplaces, standardize how the dust is calculated, and require medical monitoring for employees exposed to high levels.

| May 3, 2014

California’s Title 24 promises to reshape the construction industry

California’s recent revisions to Title 24 contain ambitious performance goals: all residential buildings must be Zero Net Energy by 2020 and commercial buildings must reach that standard by 2030.

| Apr 30, 2014

House Appropriations Committee approves $3 billion cut for military construction

The Army would see the sharpest cuts on a percentage basis, with a $578 million, or 52% reduction in FY 2015.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021