flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

Codes and Standards

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. 


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | April 22, 2015
OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The Construction Industry Safety Coalition will cost the industry $5 billion per year. Image: Morgue File/PenMac

A new report by the Construction Industry Safety Coalition (CISC) found that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) proposed silica standards for U.S. construction industry will cost the industry $5 billion per year. That’s about $4.5 billion per year more than OSHA’s estimate.

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. The proposed rule aims to greatly reduce the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of crystalline silica for the construction industry.

The agency pegged the cost to the construction industry at about $511 million a year. “The OSHA analysis included major errors and omissions that account for the large discrepancies with the CISC report,” according to a statement from the industry group.

The CISC report estimates that about 80% of the cost ($3.9 billion/year) will be direct compliance expenditures by the industry such as additional equipment, labor and record-keeping costs.

The remaining 20% will come from increased prices that the industry will have to pay for construction materials and building products such as concrete block, glass, and roofing shingles. OSHA’s estimates failed to take into account these additional costs, CISC says. The added cost would be passed down to customers, the industry group says.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Sep 27, 2019

Open source tool allows comparison of embodied carbon emissions from construction materials

Enables carbon-smart choices during material specification and procurement.

Codes and Standards | Sep 27, 2019

AIA declaration: Climate change requires ‘holistic approach’

Must address interdependencies among people, buildings, infrastructure, and the environment.

Codes and Standards | Sep 26, 2019

San Jose’s new building energy code is the most stringent among large cities

New regulations aim to make zero-emission electric buildings the norm.

Codes and Standards | Sep 26, 2019

Building support for climate action depends on linking it to health, economic benefits

USGBC report finds most people don’t think environmental problems significant enough to prioritize action.

Codes and Standards | Sep 20, 2019

OSHA has a new chief for its construction directorate

Former Army medical staffer Scott Ketcham has extensive OSHA experience.

Codes and Standards | Sep 20, 2019

American Wood Council updates free Connection Calculator

Tool includes cross-laminated timber connection provisions and post-frame ring shank nails.

Codes and Standards | Sep 19, 2019

Virtual reconnaissance of Bahamas finds some structures performed well during Dorian

Amid devastation, lives likely saved by resilient buildings.

Codes and Standards | Sep 19, 2019

Obama-era Waters of the U.S. rule revoked

New rule expected to define protected waterways more narrowly.

Codes and Standards | Sep 17, 2019

California will enact rent cap bill limiting rent increases to 5% plus inflation

Applies to apartments built at least 15 years ago.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021