flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

Codes and Standards

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. 


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | April 22, 2015
OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The Construction Industry Safety Coalition will cost the industry $5 billion per year. Image: Morgue File/PenMac

A new report by the Construction Industry Safety Coalition (CISC) found that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) proposed silica standards for U.S. construction industry will cost the industry $5 billion per year. That’s about $4.5 billion per year more than OSHA’s estimate.

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. The proposed rule aims to greatly reduce the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of crystalline silica for the construction industry.

The agency pegged the cost to the construction industry at about $511 million a year. “The OSHA analysis included major errors and omissions that account for the large discrepancies with the CISC report,” according to a statement from the industry group.

The CISC report estimates that about 80% of the cost ($3.9 billion/year) will be direct compliance expenditures by the industry such as additional equipment, labor and record-keeping costs.

The remaining 20% will come from increased prices that the industry will have to pay for construction materials and building products such as concrete block, glass, and roofing shingles. OSHA’s estimates failed to take into account these additional costs, CISC says. The added cost would be passed down to customers, the industry group says.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Mar 27, 2017

Bills in Maryland Legislature would restrict use of wood in multifamily construction

American Wood Council and design and construction professionals are speaking out against the measure.

Codes and Standards | Mar 23, 2017

New manual of IT connectivity guidelines for commercial developments, redevelopments released

Mobile capacity planning, conduit points of entry, and electrical resiliency are covered.

Codes and Standards | Mar 22, 2017

Brick Industry Assn. study finds brick buildings cost less than precast, metal, and glass

The study compares costs in five categories of construction.

Codes and Standards | Mar 21, 2017

Calif. shopping center is first to earn BREEAM USA In-Use certification

The certification measures and monitors environmental performance of existing buildings.

Codes and Standards | Mar 20, 2017

Professional liability insurance rates for architects and engineers expected to be stable in 2017

Premiums leveled off in 2015, and claims have been stable, helping to hold costs down.

Codes and Standards | Mar 15, 2017

Energy Star program at risk

The standard-setting initiative for energy-efficient products may be a victim of Trump budget cuts.

Codes and Standards | Mar 13, 2017

U.S. House and Senate have voted to repeal Dept. of Labor’s 'blacklisting' rule

The rule mandates labor compliance review for federal construction contractors.

Codes and Standards | Mar 9, 2017

WiredScore forms Connectivity Advisory Committee

The committee's creation is an important step forward for the group that evaluates internet connectivity in buildings.

Codes and Standards | Mar 8, 2017

New guide examines multifamily high-performance ventilation

The focus is on cost and performance of various systems.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category

Sustainability

Grimshaw launches free online tool to help accelerate decarbonization of buildings

Minoro, an online platform to help accelerate the decarbonization of buildings, was recently launched by architecture firm Grimshaw, in collaboration with more than 20 supporting organizations including World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), RIBA, Architecture 2030, the World Green Building Council (WorldGBC) and several national Green Building Councils from across the globe.




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021