flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Nine out of 10 New York City building plans fail energy code test

Nine out of 10 New York City building plans fail energy code test

Changes to the code planned for next year creating concerns


By BD+C Staff | September 10, 2014
Midtown from Brooklyn Bridge. Photo: Mark Jaroski. Licensed under Creative Commo
Midtown from Brooklyn Bridge. Photo: Mark Jaroski. Licensed under Creative Commons

Earlier this year, New York City's Department of Buildings began auditing thousands of architectural plans for new and renovated office and residential buildings. Nine of every 10 have failed to meet the energy code, a 30-year-old set of standards.

The compliance enforcement effort began under Mayor Michael Bloomberg last year, when he assigned auditors to pore over 212 randomly selected building plans. This year, auditors have examined more than 1,200 applications.

The standards are only now being enforced in earnest. In some cases, the Department of Buildings has stopped nonconforming projects. “We're very serious about this, and are trying to educate the industry on what is required,” said Gina Bocra, chief sustainability officer at the Department of Buildings, which set up a permanent audit unit this year. “Buildings are the largest source of energy consumption in our city, and how we conserve energy is key to making progress on reducing greenhouse-gas emissions.”

Some are complaining about the potential costs of compliance and potential to lengthen construction schedules. Planned additions to the building code over the next year are boosting concerns. “The energy code can be an effective way to increase efficiency if it remains flexible, but the more mandatory and prescriptive any code is, the more difficult it is to build a building that complies — particularly in New York City,” said Angela Pinsky, a senior vice president of management services and government affairs with the Real Estate Board of New York.

(http://www.businessinsurance.com/article/20140818/NEWS07/140819859?tags=|338|69|310|80|303)

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Jun 13, 2017

Canada Green Building Council and Green Business Certification Inc. announce partnership

New joint venture will deliver enhanced services and support tools and programs throughout Canada.

Codes and Standards | Jun 8, 2017

Nail-Laminated Timber Design and Construction Guide released

New document focuses on design and construction considerations for horizontal NLT applications.

Codes and Standards | Jun 8, 2017

Car sharing popularity means parking zoning and codes may be promoting overbuilding of garages

Some designers look to modular designs in anticipation of alternate uses.

Codes and Standards | Jun 7, 2017

IAPMO advances toward new 2017 Water Efficiency and Sanitation Standard

Revised pipe-sizing method for residential applications will be included.

Codes and Standards | Jun 7, 2017

New Colorado law could stimulate stalled condo market

Construction defect law modifications could ease litigation risk and cut insurance rates.

Codes and Standards | May 30, 2017

Industry Groups move toward Unified Green Building Model Code in 2018

The effort involves combining ASHRAE's Standard 189.1 with the International Green Construction Code.

Codes and Standards | May 30, 2017

OSHA suspends electronic injury, illness reporting requirement

The agency is keeping records from being publicly disclosed—for now.

Codes and Standards | May 30, 2017

Florida preparing to adjust to new building elevation requirements

New floodplain maps and state code changes loom.

Codes and Standards | May 30, 2017

Heated debate over whether Calif.’s prevailing wage requirement stymies affordable housing

There’s disagreement around how much pay regulations add to cost of projects.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021