flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

In the NIL era, colleges and universities are stepping up their sports facilities game

Sports and Recreational Facilities

In the NIL era, colleges and universities are stepping up their sports facilities game

NIL policies have raised expectations among student-athletes about the quality of sports training and performing facilities, in ways that present new opportunities for AEC firms.


By John Caulfield, Senior Editor | October 17, 2024
the renovation of Sam Houston State University’s Mafrige Fieldhouse Locker Room, Photo courtesy PBK
Colleges are upgrading their athletic facilities to meet the rising expectations of student-athletes and to recruit new players. Shown here is the renovation of Sam Houston State University’s Mafrige Fieldhouse Locker Room. Photo courtesy PBK

Since July 1, 2021, student-athletes in most states have had the right to control the use of their names, images, and likenesses (NIL) for marketing and publicity purposes, and be compensated for that usage while maintaining their amateur status to continue playing for their college teams.

This change has led colleges and universities to strike NIL deals with businesses and advertisers, through which individual athletes can negotiate. Booster groups, like alumni associations, have also formed NIL Collectives that raise money from NIL agreements that is made available to students in exchange for using their persona. Sweeter deals can motivate student-athletes to transfer, which complicates teams’ recruiting and roster-building objectives.

NIL policies have raised expectations among student-athletes about the quality of sports training and performing facilities, in ways that present new design, renovation, and construction opportunities for AEC firms with sports practices.

“Schools’ facilities need to be more competitive, and find revenue-generating solutions,” says Sean Plunkett, Managing Principal with PBK Sports, a division of PRK Architects, which has pursued this avenue for higher ed business. He’s seeing more modifications to campus sports venues that create different experiences, such as pay tiers for seating, tailgating, and food and beverage.

On August 22, BD+C interviewed Plunkett and Melvin Robinson, who had recently joined PBK Sports as National Director of Sports Client Engagement. Robinson’s resume includes nearly 15 years with the University of Georgia Athletic Association, with stints as Director of Facilities and Assistant Athletic Director. They had just met with the coaches and staff of a major Big Ten state university, “where football matters,” says Plunkett.

Pictured: Texas A&M University’s remodel of its Davis Center Nutrition Station. Photo courtesy PBK
Pictured: Texas A&M University’s remodel of its Davis Center Nutrition Station. Photo courtesy PBK

Over the past decade, Robinson has watched college sports programs engage in a recruiting arms race, with their athletic facilities as weapons. “It started in the locker room: who has the best pool, the best barber shop? It has all been about flash and pop.” During this period, and especially over the past few years, he’s seen student-athletes evolve into “entrepreneurs,” which can add another layer of stress. College sports programming now includes health, wellness, and financial services to help their athletes handle the pressure.

Student-athletes, he says, have come to expect training facilities to resemble mini versions of ESPN. “You need digital spaces, technology, studios. Hollywood meets higher ed,” Robinson quips. And because college sports, especially football and basketball, are ubiquitous on TV and online platforms, their facilities often define the school’s image for student-athletes and their parents.

“The facilities are a big part of recruiting, enticing, and retaining athletes,” says Robinson.

The cost of new construction or renovation usually isn’t an impediment, says Plunkett, who notes that financing typically comes from ticket sales, donors, and vendors. To help its clients fill gaps in financing, PBK suggests things like seating values, and offering diverse fan experiences both inside and outside the stadium or arena.

Robinson observes that professional sports teams are generally more attentive to the comfort and convenience of their fans, whereas colleges are all about the players. However, pros’ training facilities are catching up. “NIL is leveling the playing field,“ says Robinson.

Related Stories

| Sep 2, 2014

Ranked: Top green building sector AEC firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]

AECOM, Gensler, and Turner top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest green design and construction firms. 

| Aug 29, 2014

The new College Football Hall of Fame opens in Atlanta

Adjacent to the Georgia World Congress Center and Centennial Olympic Park, the three-story, 94,250-sf attraction is designed to celebrate the traditions of college football. 

| Aug 27, 2014

Ranked: Top sports facility sector AEC firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Populous, AECOM, and Turner head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest sports facility design and construction firms, as reported in the 2014 Giants 300 Report.

| Aug 27, 2014

Survey of NCAA athletic directors reveals strong demand for new facilities, fan amenities

More than 80% of college athletic directors plan to make significant investments in facilities over the next five years to target potential recruits and spectators, according to a new survey by AECOM and Ohio University.

| Aug 20, 2014

WELL Building: The next step in green sports construction

The WELL Building Standard, a new protocol that focuses on human wellness within the built environment, is a particularly good fit for sports facilities, write Skanska's Tom Tingle and Beth Heider.

| Aug 19, 2014

HOK to acquire 360 Architecture

Expected to be finalized by the end of October, the acquisition of 360 Architecture will provide immediate benefits to both firms’ clients worldwide as HOK re-enters the sports and entertainment market.

| Jul 28, 2014

Reconstruction market benefits from improving economy, new technology [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Following years of fairly lackluster demand for commercial property remodeling, reconstruction revenue is improving, according to the 2014 Giants 300 report.

| Jul 28, 2014

Reconstruction Sector Construction Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Structure Tone, Turner, and Gilbane top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest reconstruction contractor and construction management firms in the U.S.

| Jul 28, 2014

Reconstruction Sector Engineering Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Jacobs, URS, and Wiss, Janney, Elstner top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest reconstruction engineering and engineering/architecture firms in the U.S.

| Jul 28, 2014

Reconstruction Sector Architecture Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Stantec, HDR, and HOK top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest reconstruction architecture and architecture/engineering firms in the U.S.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




Great Solutions

41 Great Solutions for architects, engineers, and contractors

AI ChatBots, ambient computing, floating MRIs, low-carbon cement, sunshine on demand, next-generation top-down construction. These and 35 other innovations make up our 2024 Great Solutions Report, which highlights fresh ideas and innovations from leading architecture, engineering, and construction firms.

halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021

Â