flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Newer materials for green, resilient building complicate insurance underwriting

Newer materials for green, resilient building complicate insurance underwriting

Insurers can’t look to years of testing on emerging technology to assess risk.


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | August 4, 2022
Sustainable materials
Courtesy Pexels.

New sustainable energy products using new and emerging technology make it difficult for insurance carriers to assess risk on green building projects.

Unlike on projects using standard materials, underwriters cannot look to many years of rigorous testing to see how products perform. This makes it hard to assess risk and offer policies on projects that use advanced features such as vegetative roofs, mass timber, or advanced solar panel technology.

New technology, materials, and construction methods can bring unforeseen risks, insurance executives say. Many green buildings have novel designs compared with those using conventional construction where much has been done the same way for years and the risks are well known.

Business interruptions caused by material damage in green building construction have generated costly and complex claims. These claims concern both the expense of replacing the damaged material and the amount of time it takes to replace it, especially given current supply chain difficulties.

Related Stories

| Jul 30, 2014

Nonresidential building activity on the rise for 2015: AIA Forecast

Semiannual Consensus Construction Forecast predicts 4.9% increase this year, 8% next year, with offices and retail facilities leading the charge.

| Jul 29, 2014

AECOM's buying spree continues: Deal to acquire Hunt Construction Group in the works

The acquisition comes just two weeks after AECOM's $6 billion deal to acquire rival engineering and construction company URS Corp.

| Jul 28, 2014

Reconstruction market benefits from improving economy, new technology [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Following years of fairly lackluster demand for commercial property remodeling, reconstruction revenue is improving, according to the 2014 Giants 300 report.

| Jul 28, 2014

Reconstruction Sector Construction Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Structure Tone, Turner, and Gilbane top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest reconstruction contractor and construction management firms in the U.S.

| Jul 28, 2014

Reconstruction Sector Engineering Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Jacobs, URS, and Wiss, Janney, Elstner top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest reconstruction engineering and engineering/architecture firms in the U.S.

| Jul 28, 2014

Reconstruction Sector Architecture Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Stantec, HDR, and HOK top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest reconstruction architecture and architecture/engineering firms in the U.S.

| Jul 27, 2014

Top Data Center Construction Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Holder, Turner, and DPR head Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest data center contractors and construction management firms in the U.S.

| Jul 27, 2014

Top Data Center Engineering Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Fluor, Jacobs, and Syska Hennessy top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest data center engineering and engineering/architecture firms in the U.S.

| Jul 27, 2014

Top Data Center Architecture Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Gensler, Corgan, and HDR head Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest data center architecture and architecture/engineering firms in the U.S.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021