For years, the steel joist industry standard has been that loads either need to be applied at panel points, or a member brace (strut) must be added in the field. In response to inquiries from structural engineers and other members of the Building Team, the Steel Joist Institute recently issued a new rule for loads not exceeding 100 pounds within any given panel.Â
The full text of the SJI rule reads as follows: âFor nominal concentrated loads between panel points, which have been accounted for in the specified uniform design loads, a strut to transfer the load to a panel point on the opposite chord shall not be required, provided the sum of the concentrated loads within a chord panel does not exceed 100 pounds and the attachments are concentric to the chord.â
Bruce Brothersen, engineering manager for Vulcraft-Utah, Brigham, Utah, says, âThe rule is an attempt to better define what is acceptable and put some quantitative numbers to it.â
Tim Holtermann, corporate engineering manager for Canam Steel in Washington, Mo., says that even with the new rule, manufacturers remain concerned that âpeople may be hanging things in excess of 100 pounds away from panel points and not field-adding struts, as theyâre required to do.â
Holtermann says one option for structural engineers is to ask the manufacturer to provide a specially designed joist that can take point loads over 100 pounds without the added members. âItâs not uncommon to have a design requirement for, say, 250 pounds or 400 pounds,â he says. âWe can readily do that as long as the magnitude of the loads and this design requirement are specified on the contract drawings.â
DONâT WAIT FOR THE FINAL PUNCH LIST
Often the problem with the joist loads isnât discovered until the project is completed and the final walkthrough is taking place, says Joe Pote, director of research and development for New Millennium Building Systems, Hope, Ark.
âThe inspector notices ductwork or sprinkler lines or mechanicals hanging from the joists between panel points that arenât called out on the contract drawings,â says Pote. âThen he comes back to us and asks if itâs okay.â Many times the loads are small (20-50 pounds), so additional reinforcement isnât necessary. âBut we never had a good rule that stated the maximum load,â he says. âI think it helps clear up some of the discrepancy between SJI requirements and actual field practice.â
The manner in which the loads are hung is a key element of the 100-pound rule, says Holtermann. âThe rule presumes that the load will be placed concentrically,â he says.
As SJI managing director Ken Charles notes, some trade installers make the mistake of attaching beam clamps to only one bottom chord angle of the joist instead of both. On top of that, he says, âthe load isnât placed concentrically even to that one chord angle, so youâre inducing some torsion and bending of the horizontal leg of the angle.â
His advice: âBy far the better way to do it is to make sure the attachment is always concentric and always attached to both chord angles.â (See diagram.)
Steel Joist Doâs and Donâts
- Recognize how and when to specify total uniform load or factored load and/or net uplift load, and when loads need to be broken out by load category and combinations.
- Know the limits of a concentrated load applied between panel points before an additional web is needed on the joist. The Steel Joist Instituteâs new â100-pound ruleâ clarifies these limits.
- Install bridging early and follow the proper procedures to avoid safety problems, such as a partial building collapse.
- Designate a field representative to inspect the joists during construction and ensure that components are being installed correctly.Ideally, a representative of the team should walk the job site before completion and look for situations where loads arenât handled correctly.
âA lot of times thereâs a disconnect between the design intent and the construction site personnel,â says Charles. âSome sites have representatives in the field to do inspections, but often thatâs not the case. Those are the projects that are most likely to have problems down the road when the final punch list is done.â
GET YOUR SPECS STRAIGHT
Joists are designed to handle different types of loads, such as dead load, live load, and wind, snow, and seismic loads. A given joist might experience more than one type of load, so the joist manufacturer needs to know which loads apply and properly combine them according to parameters set by the International Building Code. Most jurisdictions use the 2006 version of the IBC or the 2009 version, which is similar with regard to steel joists.
Brothersen notes that the building code loading combinations are based on the probability of which loads will act simultaneously. âFor instance, the probability of a seismic event occurring when the maximum snow load is on the joist is relatively small, so the building code reduces the loads in those cases,â he says. âThis is more realistic and doesnât require manufacturers to design for the maximum load in every category at the same time.â
Pote says manufacturers prefer, when itâs feasible, that loads be provided to them as either a total uniform load or a factored load. In other words, if all components of the joist can be designed for a single downward-acting load case and a single upward-acting load case, the easiest thing for engineers to do is provide the total uniform load and/or net uplift load (dead load minus wind load).
âItâs just easier to communicate,â says Charles. âHowever, if we have to consider multiple load combinations, we need the breakdownâdead load, live load, snow load, and so forth.â
Holtermann adds that if the structure might be affected by downward-acting winds, the total uniform load should assume the worst-case scenario.
DONâT FORGET THE BRIDGING
Once the joists arrive on site, itâs important that bridging be installed early and correctly, says Brothersen. âIf the joists are put up but the bridging isnât installed, it can become a safety issue.â For example, lack of bridging can result in a partial building collapse when the crew begins stacking bundles of deck material on the joists.
Charles agrees. âThe best-laid plans of the engineer and manufacturer can go out the window when the product arrives at the job site and the erector doesnât follow proper safety regulations and the manufacturerâs advice.â BD+C
--
Editorâs note: To order SJIâs â43rd Edition Catalog of Standard Specifications and Load and Weight Tables for Steel Joists and Joist Girders,â go to: http://steeljoist.org/free-download-form.
Related Stories
| Jan 13, 2014
6 legislative actions to ignite the construction economy
The American Institute of Architects announced its âpunch listâ for Congress that, if completed, will ignite the construction economy by spurring much needed improvements in energy efficiency, infrastructure, and resiliency, and create jobs for small business.
| Jan 12, 2014
CES showcases innovations: Can any of these help you do your job better?
The Consumer Electronics Show took place this past week in Las Vegas. Known for launching new products and technologies, many of the products showcased there set the bar for future innovators. The show also signals trends to watch in technology applicable to the design and building industry.Â
| Jan 12, 2014
The âfuzz factorâ in engineering: when continuous improvement is neither
The biggest threat to human life in a building isnât the potential of natural disasters, but the threat of human error. I believe itâs a reality that increases in probability every time a code or standard change is proposed.Â
| Jan 12, 2014
5 ways virtual modeling can improve facilities management
Improved space management, streamlined maintenance, and economical retrofits are among the ways building owners and facility managers can benefit from building information modeling.
| Jan 11, 2014
Getting to net-zero energy with brick masonry construction [AIA course]
When targeting net-zero energy performance, AEC professionals are advised to tackle energy demand first. This AIA course covers brick masonry's role in reducing energy consumption in buildings.Â
| Jan 10, 2014
What the states should do to prevent more school shootings
To tell the truth, I didnât want to write about the terrible events of December 14, 2012, when 20 children and six adults were gunned down at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn. I figured other media would provide ample coverage, and anything we did would look cheap or inappropriate. But two things turned me around.
| Jan 10, 2014
Special Report: K-12 school security in the wake of Sandy Hook
BD+C's exclusive five-part report on K-12 school security offers proven design advice, technology recommendations, and thoughtful commentary on how Building Teams can help school districts prevent, or at least mitigate, a Sandy Hook on their turf.
| Jan 10, 2014
Resiliency, material health among top AEC focuses for 2014: Perkins+Will survey
Architectural giant Perkins+Will recently surveyed its staff of 1,500 design pros to forcast hot trends in the AEC field for 2014. The resulting Design + Insights Survey reflects a global perspective.
| Jan 9, 2014
How security in schools applies to other building types
Many of the principles and concepts described in our Special Report on K-12 security also apply to other building types and markets.
| Jan 9, 2014
16 recommendations on security technology to take to your K-12 clients
From facial recognition cameras to IP-based door hardware, here are key technology-related considerations you should discuss with your school district clients.