flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

New SJI Rule on Steel Joists

New SJI Rule on Steel Joists

A new rule from the Steel Joist Institute clarifies when local reinforcement of joists is required for chord loads away from panel points. SJI members offer guidance about how and when to specify loads.


By By Susan Bady, Contributing Editor | January 3, 2012
New SJI Rule on Steel Joists
According to a new rule issued by the Steel Joist Institute, the proper way to hang loads from joist chords is concentrically (n
This article first appeared in the January 2012 issue of BD+C.

For years, the steel joist industry standard has been that loads either need to be applied at panel points, or a member brace (strut) must be added in the field. In response to inquiries from structural engineers and other members of the Building Team, the Steel Joist Institute recently issued a new rule for loads not exceeding 100 pounds within any given panel. 

The full text of the SJI rule reads as follows: “For nominal concentrated loads between panel points, which have been accounted for in the specified uniform design loads, a strut to transfer the load to a panel point on the opposite chord shall not be required, provided the sum of the concentrated loads within a chord panel does not exceed 100 pounds and the attachments are concentric to the chord.”

Bruce Brothersen, engineering manager for Vulcraft-Utah, Brigham, Utah, says, “The rule is an attempt to better define what is acceptable and put some quantitative numbers to it.”

Tim Holtermann, corporate engineering manager for Canam Steel in Washington, Mo., says that even with the new rule, manufacturers remain concerned that “people may be hanging things in excess of 100 pounds away from panel points and not field-adding struts, as they’re required to do.”

Holtermann says one option for structural engineers is to ask the manufacturer to provide a specially designed joist that can take point loads over 100 pounds without the added members. “It’s not uncommon to have a design requirement for, say, 250 pounds or 400 pounds,” he says. “We can readily do that as long as the magnitude of the loads and this design requirement are specified on the contract drawings.”

DON’T WAIT FOR THE FINAL PUNCH LIST
Often the problem with the joist loads isn’t discovered until the project is completed and the final walkthrough is taking place, says Joe Pote, director of research and development for New Millennium Building Systems, Hope, Ark.

“The inspector notices ductwork or sprinkler lines or mechanicals hanging from the joists between panel points that aren’t called out on the contract drawings,” says Pote. “Then he comes back to us and asks if it’s okay.” Many times the loads are small (20-50 pounds), so additional reinforcement isn’t necessary. “But we never had a good rule that stated the maximum load,” he says. “I think it helps clear up some of the discrepancy between SJI requirements and actual field practice.”

The manner in which the loads are hung is a key element of the 100-pound rule, says Holtermann. “The rule presumes that the load will be placed concentrically,” he says.

As SJI managing director Ken Charles notes, some trade installers make the mistake of attaching beam clamps to only one bottom chord angle of the joist instead of both. On top of that, he says, “the load isn’t placed concentrically even to that one chord angle, so you’re inducing some torsion and bending of the horizontal leg of the angle.”

His advice: “By far the better way to do it is to make sure the attachment is always concentric and always attached to both chord angles.” (See diagram.)

Steel Joist Do’s and Don’ts

  • Recognize how and when to specify total uniform load or factored load and/or net uplift load, and when loads need to be broken out by load category and combinations.
  • Know the limits of a concentrated load applied between panel points before an additional web is needed on the joist. The Steel Joist Institute’s new “100-pound rule” clarifies these limits.
  • Install bridging early and follow the proper procedures to avoid safety problems, such as a partial building collapse.
  • Designate a field representative to inspect the joists during construction and ensure that components are being installed correctly.Ideally, a representative of the team should walk the job site before completion and look for situations where loads aren’t handled correctly.

“A lot of times there’s a disconnect between the design intent and the construction site personnel,” says Charles. “Some sites have representatives in the field to do inspections, but often that’s not the case. Those are the projects that are most likely to have problems down the road when the final punch list is done.”

GET YOUR SPECS STRAIGHT
Joists are designed to handle different types of loads, such as dead load, live load, and wind, snow, and seismic loads. A given joist might experience more than one type of load, so the joist manufacturer needs to know which loads apply and properly combine them according to parameters set by the International Building Code. Most jurisdictions use the 2006 version of the IBC or the 2009 version, which is similar with regard to steel joists.

Brothersen notes that the building code loading combinations are based on the probability of which loads will act simultaneously. “For instance, the probability of a seismic event occurring when the maximum snow load is on the joist is relatively small, so the building code reduces the loads in those cases,” he says. “This is more realistic and doesn’t require manufacturers to design for the maximum load in every category at the same time.”

Pote says manufacturers prefer, when it’s feasible, that loads be provided to them as either a total uniform load or a factored load. In other words, if all components of the joist can be designed for a single downward-acting load case and a single upward-acting load case, the easiest thing for engineers to do is provide the total uniform load and/or net uplift load (dead load minus wind load).

“It’s just easier to communicate,” says Charles. “However, if we have to consider multiple load combinations, we need the breakdown—dead load, live load, snow load, and so forth.”

Holtermann adds that if the structure might be affected by downward-acting winds, the total uniform load should assume the worst-case scenario.

DON’T FORGET THE BRIDGING
Once the joists arrive on site, it’s important that bridging be installed early and correctly, says Brothersen. “If the joists are put up but the bridging isn’t installed, it can become a safety issue.” For example, lack of bridging can result in a partial building collapse when the crew begins stacking bundles of deck material on the joists.

Charles agrees. “The best-laid plans of the engineer and manufacturer can go out the window when the product arrives at the job site and the erector doesn’t follow proper safety regulations and the manufacturer’s advice.” BD+C
--
Editor’s note: To order SJI’s “43rd Edition Catalog of Standard Specifications and Load and Weight Tables for Steel Joists and Joist Girders,” go to: http://steeljoist.org/free-download-form.

Related Stories

| Sep 10, 2014

Lessons for the shore: Bolstering resilience of the built environment

Nearly 32 million people, or 28% of the East Coast's population, live in areas lying within a mile of a shore line. The good news is that municipalities are starting to take action, writes Sasaki Associates. 

| Sep 9, 2014

Using Facebook to transform workplace design

As part of our ongoing studies of how building design influences human behavior in today’s social media-driven world, HOK’s workplace strategists had an idea: Leverage the power of social media to collect data about how people feel about their workplaces and the type of spaces they need to succeed.

| Sep 9, 2014

Ranked: Top religious sector AEC firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Brasfield & Gorrie, Gensler, and Jacobs top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest religious sector design and construction firms, as reported in the 2014 Giants 300 Report.

| Sep 9, 2014

Take a look at the hardhat of the future

A Los Angeles-based startup added augmented reality technology to a hardhat, creating a smart helmet.

| Sep 9, 2014

Frank Lloyd Wright's Annie Pfeiffer Chapel brought back to life using 3D printing

Restoration of the Frank Lloyd Wright-designed chapel was made possible (and affordable) thanks to 3D printing.

| Sep 8, 2014

First Look: Foster + Partners, Fernando Romero win competition for Mexico City's newest international airport

Designed to be the world’s most sustainable airport, the plan uses a single, compact terminal scheme in lieu of a cluster of buildings, offering shorter walking distances and fewer level changes, and eliminating the need for trains and tunnels. 

| Sep 8, 2014

Trimble acquires Gehry Technologies, aims to create tools for linking office and job site

Trimble and Frank Gehry announced that they have entered into a strategic alliance to collaborate to transform the construction industry by further connecting the office to on-site construction technologies. As part of the alliance, Trimble has acquired Gehry Technologies.

| Sep 7, 2014

Ranked: Top state government sector AEC firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]

PCL Construction, Stantec, and AECOM head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest state government design and construction firms, as reported in the 2014 Giants 300 Report.  

| Sep 7, 2014

Hybrid healthcare: Revamping inefficient inpatient units to revenue-producing outpatient care

It's happening at community hospitals all over America: leadership teams are looking for ways to maintain margins by managing underutilized and non-revenue producing space. GS&P's David Magner explores nontraditional healthcare models.

| Sep 7, 2014

USGBC + American Chemistry Council: Unlikely partners in green building

In this new partnership, LEED will benefit from the materials expertise of ACC and its member companies. We believe this has the potential to be transformational, writes Skanska USA's President and CEO Michael McNally.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category

Giants 400

Top 100 Architecture Engineering Firms for 2024

Stantec, HDR, Page, HOK, and Arcadis North America top Building Design+Construction's ranking of the nation's largest architecture engineering (AE) firms for nonresidential building and multifamily housing work, as reported in BD+C's 2024 Giants 400 Report.



Giants 400

Top 200 Architecture Firms for 2024

Gensler, HKS, Perkins&Will, Corgan, and Populous top Building Design+Construction's ranking of the nation's largest architecture firms for nonresidential building and multifamily housing work, as reported in BD+C's 2024 Giants 400 Report.


halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021