flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

New SJI Rule on Steel Joists

New SJI Rule on Steel Joists

A new rule from the Steel Joist Institute clarifies when local reinforcement of joists is required for chord loads away from panel points. SJI members offer guidance about how and when to specify loads.


By By Susan Bady, Contributing Editor | January 3, 2012
New SJI Rule on Steel Joists
According to a new rule issued by the Steel Joist Institute, the proper way to hang loads from joist chords is concentrically (n
This article first appeared in the January 2012 issue of BD+C.

For years, the steel joist industry standard has been that loads either need to be applied at panel points, or a member brace (strut) must be added in the field. In response to inquiries from structural engineers and other members of the Building Team, the Steel Joist Institute recently issued a new rule for loads not exceeding 100 pounds within any given panel. 

The full text of the SJI rule reads as follows: “For nominal concentrated loads between panel points, which have been accounted for in the specified uniform design loads, a strut to transfer the load to a panel point on the opposite chord shall not be required, provided the sum of the concentrated loads within a chord panel does not exceed 100 pounds and the attachments are concentric to the chord.”

Bruce Brothersen, engineering manager for Vulcraft-Utah, Brigham, Utah, says, “The rule is an attempt to better define what is acceptable and put some quantitative numbers to it.”

Tim Holtermann, corporate engineering manager for Canam Steel in Washington, Mo., says that even with the new rule, manufacturers remain concerned that “people may be hanging things in excess of 100 pounds away from panel points and not field-adding struts, as they’re required to do.”

Holtermann says one option for structural engineers is to ask the manufacturer to provide a specially designed joist that can take point loads over 100 pounds without the added members. “It’s not uncommon to have a design requirement for, say, 250 pounds or 400 pounds,” he says. “We can readily do that as long as the magnitude of the loads and this design requirement are specified on the contract drawings.”

DON’T WAIT FOR THE FINAL PUNCH LIST
Often the problem with the joist loads isn’t discovered until the project is completed and the final walkthrough is taking place, says Joe Pote, director of research and development for New Millennium Building Systems, Hope, Ark.

“The inspector notices ductwork or sprinkler lines or mechanicals hanging from the joists between panel points that aren’t called out on the contract drawings,” says Pote. “Then he comes back to us and asks if it’s okay.” Many times the loads are small (20-50 pounds), so additional reinforcement isn’t necessary. “But we never had a good rule that stated the maximum load,” he says. “I think it helps clear up some of the discrepancy between SJI requirements and actual field practice.”

The manner in which the loads are hung is a key element of the 100-pound rule, says Holtermann. “The rule presumes that the load will be placed concentrically,” he says.

As SJI managing director Ken Charles notes, some trade installers make the mistake of attaching beam clamps to only one bottom chord angle of the joist instead of both. On top of that, he says, “the load isn’t placed concentrically even to that one chord angle, so you’re inducing some torsion and bending of the horizontal leg of the angle.”

His advice: “By far the better way to do it is to make sure the attachment is always concentric and always attached to both chord angles.” (See diagram.)

Steel Joist Do’s and Don’ts

  • Recognize how and when to specify total uniform load or factored load and/or net uplift load, and when loads need to be broken out by load category and combinations.
  • Know the limits of a concentrated load applied between panel points before an additional web is needed on the joist. The Steel Joist Institute’s new “100-pound rule” clarifies these limits.
  • Install bridging early and follow the proper procedures to avoid safety problems, such as a partial building collapse.
  • Designate a field representative to inspect the joists during construction and ensure that components are being installed correctly.Ideally, a representative of the team should walk the job site before completion and look for situations where loads aren’t handled correctly.

“A lot of times there’s a disconnect between the design intent and the construction site personnel,” says Charles. “Some sites have representatives in the field to do inspections, but often that’s not the case. Those are the projects that are most likely to have problems down the road when the final punch list is done.”

GET YOUR SPECS STRAIGHT
Joists are designed to handle different types of loads, such as dead load, live load, and wind, snow, and seismic loads. A given joist might experience more than one type of load, so the joist manufacturer needs to know which loads apply and properly combine them according to parameters set by the International Building Code. Most jurisdictions use the 2006 version of the IBC or the 2009 version, which is similar with regard to steel joists.

Brothersen notes that the building code loading combinations are based on the probability of which loads will act simultaneously. “For instance, the probability of a seismic event occurring when the maximum snow load is on the joist is relatively small, so the building code reduces the loads in those cases,” he says. “This is more realistic and doesn’t require manufacturers to design for the maximum load in every category at the same time.”

Pote says manufacturers prefer, when it’s feasible, that loads be provided to them as either a total uniform load or a factored load. In other words, if all components of the joist can be designed for a single downward-acting load case and a single upward-acting load case, the easiest thing for engineers to do is provide the total uniform load and/or net uplift load (dead load minus wind load).

“It’s just easier to communicate,” says Charles. “However, if we have to consider multiple load combinations, we need the breakdown—dead load, live load, snow load, and so forth.”

Holtermann adds that if the structure might be affected by downward-acting winds, the total uniform load should assume the worst-case scenario.

DON’T FORGET THE BRIDGING
Once the joists arrive on site, it’s important that bridging be installed early and correctly, says Brothersen. “If the joists are put up but the bridging isn’t installed, it can become a safety issue.” For example, lack of bridging can result in a partial building collapse when the crew begins stacking bundles of deck material on the joists.

Charles agrees. “The best-laid plans of the engineer and manufacturer can go out the window when the product arrives at the job site and the erector doesn’t follow proper safety regulations and the manufacturer’s advice.” BD+C
--
Editor’s note: To order SJI’s “43rd Edition Catalog of Standard Specifications and Load and Weight Tables for Steel Joists and Joist Girders,” go to: http://steeljoist.org/free-download-form.

Related Stories

Market Data | Feb 7, 2024

New download: BD+C's February 2024 Market Intelligence Report

Building Design+Construction's monthly Market Intelligence Report offers a snapshot of the health of the U.S. building construction industry, including the commercial, multifamily, institutional, and industrial building sectors. This report tracks the latest metrics related to construction spending, demand for design services, contractor backlogs, and material price trends.

Giants 400 | Feb 6, 2024

Top 80 Religious Facility Architecture Firms for 2023

Parkhill, FGM Architects, GFF, Gensler, and HOK top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest religious facility architecture and architecture engineering (AE) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Modular Building | Feb 6, 2024

Modular fire station allows for possible future reconfigurations

A fire station in Southern California leveraged prefab, modular construction for faster completion and future reconfiguration.

Giants 400 | Feb 5, 2024

Top 30 Entertainment Center, Cineplex, and Theme Park Architecture Firms for 2023

Gensler, JLL, Nelson Worldwide, AO, and Stantec top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest entertainment center, cineplex, and theme park architecture and architecture engineering (AE) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Urban Planning | Feb 5, 2024

Lessons learned from 70 years of building cities

As Sasaki looks back on 70 years of practice, we’re also looking to the future of cities. While we can’t predict what will be, we do know the needs of cities are as diverse as their scale, climate, economy, governance, and culture.

Giants 400 | Feb 5, 2024

Top 90 Shopping Mall, Big Box Store, and Strip Center Architecture Firms for 2023

Gensler, Arcadis North America, Core States Group, WD Partners, and MBH Architects top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest shopping mall, big box store, and strip center architecture and architecture engineering (AE) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Laboratories | Feb 5, 2024

DOE selects design-build team for laboratory focused on clean energy innovation

JE Dunn Construction and SmithGroup will construct the 127,000-sf Energy Materials and Processing at Scale (EMAPS) clean energy laboratory in Colorado to create a direct path from lab-scale innovations to pilot-scale production.

Architects | Feb 2, 2024

SRG Partnership joins CannonDesign to form 1,300-person design giant across 18 offices

SRG Partnership, a dynamic architecture, interiors and planning firm with studios in Portland, Oregon, and Seattle, Washington, has joined CannonDesign. This merger represents not only a fusion of businesses but a powerhouse union of two firms committed to making a profound difference through design.

Giants 400 | Feb 1, 2024

Top 90 Restaurant Architecture Firms for 2023

Chipman Design Architecture, WD Partners, Greenberg Farrow, GPD Group, and Core States Group top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest restaurant architecture and architecture engineering (AE) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Standards | Feb 1, 2024

Prioritizing water quality with the WELL Building Standard

In this edition of Building WELLness, DC WELL Accredited Professionals Hannah Arthur and Alex Kircher highlight an important item of the WELL Building Standard: water.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category

Healthcare Facilities

Watch on-demand: Key Trends in the Healthcare Facilities Market for 2024-2025

Join the Building Design+Construction editorial team for this on-demand webinar on key trends, innovations, and opportunities in the $65 billion U.S. healthcare buildings market. A panel of healthcare design and construction experts present their latest projects, trends, innovations, opportunities, and data/research on key healthcare facilities sub-sectors. A 2024-2025 U.S. healthcare facilities market outlook is also presented.




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021

Â