In November 2021, New York City enacted Local Law 126 of 2021, which is well-known in the building industry for establishing new requirements for periodic parking garage inspections. At the same time, the legislation added a section to the NYC Administrative Code mandating periodic observation of building parapets.
To allow owners time to prepare, the City set the start date for the new parapet observations for January 1, 2024.
What is required?
All buildings in New York City with parapets facing a street, sidewalk, or other public right-of-way must undergo a professional parapet observation every year.
Unlike the Facade Inspection Safety Program (FISP), which excludes buildings under six stories, the parapet rule applies to all buildings, regardless of height, with the exception of detached single- or two-family homes. While FISP inspections are conducted on a five-year cycle, and parking garage inspections are required at least every six years, the newly mandated parapet observation must be done annually.
The good news: owners do not need to file the observation report with the Department of Buildings (DOB). Whereas facade and garage inspection reports follow prescriptive formats and must be electronically submitted, parapet reports need only be kept on file by the building owner. Archives of at least six years of parapet reports must be made available should the DOB request them.
What happens if there is a hazardous condition?
Immediately upon observing an unsafe condition, the professional performing the observation is required to notify the DOB. The building owner must promptly install public protection, such as sidewalk sheds, fences, and/or safety netting, which must remain in place until the problem is remedied. Unsafe conditions must be corrected within 90 days.
What is included in the observation report?
In contrast to the FISP and parking garage laws, the new parapet rule is not prescriptive as to report sections and format. However, the report does need to include:
- Basic building information, including address and owner contact details;
- Name and contact details for the professional performing the observation;
- Date of the observation;
- Location plan and construction information for the parapets, including material, height, and thickness;
- Description of general conditions;
- Unsafe conditions and actions taken to remedy them;
- Repairs since the previous report; and
- Dated photos documenting conditions.
Rather than filing the report with the DOB, the owner retains parapet observation reports for at least six years and must be prepared to furnish them to the DOB upon request.
What steps should owners take now?
With the requirements set to begin on the first of the year, owners have just a few months to plan. If a mandated FISP inspection is scheduled for 2024, adding a separate parapet observation report to that program may be a cost-effective strategy. Similarly, parapet observation can be incorporated into other planned exterior work, such as roof rehabilitation or facade cleaning.
A design professional can offer guidance on the simplest and most budget-conscious way to meet the new annual parapet requirements as part of existing maintenance and repair programs.
Resources
RCNY §103-15: Periodic Observation of Building Parapets
Local Law 126 of 2021 – see §28-301.1.1, p. 168
“Design Guide for Parapets: Safety, Continuity, and the Building Code,” Hoffmann Architects + Engineers JOURNAL
Hoffmann Architects + Engineers specializes in the rehabilitation of building exteriors.
Our design professionals have worked with hundreds of New York City building owners to meet inspection and repair requirements since the first facade law in 1980. We provide up-to-date guidance to help owners comply with the code and safely maintain their properties. Reach us at 212-789-9915 or hoffarch.com/contact.
Related Stories
| May 8, 2014
Structural concrete code revisions open for public comments
The American Concrete Institute’s completely reorganized ACI 318-14, “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary,” is open for public review for a 45-day period.
| May 3, 2014
Controversy rages over cost, benefits of proposed OSHA silica dust rule
Introduced in August 2013, the proposal would lower allowable levels of crystalline silica in all workplaces, standardize how the dust is calculated, and require medical monitoring for employees exposed to high levels.
| May 3, 2014
California’s Title 24 promises to reshape the construction industry
California’s recent revisions to Title 24 contain ambitious performance goals: all residential buildings must be Zero Net Energy by 2020 and commercial buildings must reach that standard by 2030.
| Apr 30, 2014
House Appropriations Committee approves $3 billion cut for military construction
The Army would see the sharpest cuts on a percentage basis, with a $578 million, or 52% reduction in FY 2015.
| Apr 30, 2014
GSA wants to trade D.C. office building for construction and development services
The GSA has issued an RFQ seeking developers who can provide construction and development services in exchange for the GSA Regional Office Building and Cotton Annex located in Southwest Washington, D.C.
| Apr 30, 2014
Mexico City spending big on green roofs to fight air pollution
Although green roofs have been widely adopted in urban areas to reduce the heat island effect and stormwater runoff, Mexico City is hoping that vegetative rooftops can also reduce the city’s air pollution.
| Apr 23, 2014
California bill would make employers responsible for subcontractors' wages, workers' comp
Under the recently revised Assembly Bill 1897, employers would have to pay wages, taxes, and workers compensation on behalf of a subcontractor’s workers if the subcontractor reneges on that responsibility.
| Apr 23, 2014
Obama’s 2015 budget includes $1.7 billion to GSA for building construction, renovations
The Obama Administration has proposed $1.7 billion for construction, renovation, and repairs to federal buildings in fiscal year 2015 under the auspices of the U.S. General Services Administration.
| Apr 18, 2014
Massachusetts Supreme Court clarifies building code liability issue on mixed-use projects
The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court recently ruled that distinct portions of a mixed-used building may be treated as distinct and different structures under the state building code.
| Apr 18, 2014
First international buildings among 700-plus certified by BOMA 360 Performance Program
In the first quarter of 2014, the Building Owners and Managers Association (BOMA) International certified 66 properties in the BOMA 360 Performance Program for commercial real estate markets across the U.S and, for the first time, abroad.
