flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Most daylight harvesting schemes fall short of performance goals, says study

Most daylight harvesting schemes fall short of performance goals, says study

A new study by the Energy Center of Wisconsin shows the importance of commissioning when implementing automatic daylighting control programs.


By BD+C Staff | April 8, 2013

Analysis of daylighting control systems in 20 office and public spaces in Minnesota and Wisconsin shows that while the automatic daylight harvesting schemes are helping to reduce lighting energy in the buildings, most are not achieving optimal performance, according to a new study by the Energy Center of Wisconsin (ECW).

According to ECW, the median daylighting control system studied was saving 23% of lighting energy, including impacts on heating and cooling. This translated to 915 kWh saved for every kW of lighting controlled. But the average effectiveness (the energy saved versus energy saved with ideal control) of the controls was only 51%. This meant that almost half of the potential savings from these controls was not captured due to imperfect controls operation. Even worse, four of the 20 spaces studied had zero savings.

The low level of effectiveness, says ECW, is evidence of a lack of controls execution. The findings show that successful implementation of automatic daylighting control requires a significant commissioning effort to reach full energy-savings potential.

Read the full daylighting commissioning report from the Energy Center of Wisconsin.

As part of the report, ECW developed a tip sheet on commissioning and calibration and function testing of lighting controls. Recommendations include assigning a single person of the construction team to be responsible for verifying completion of all steps in the daylighting commissioning process, and proper training of the building owner/operator on the controls equipment and systems. Download the tip sheet (PDF)

(http://www.ecw.org/project.php?workid=1&resultid=494)

Related Stories

Multifamily Housing | Dec 16, 2020

What the Biden Administration means for multifamily construction

What can the multifamily real estate sector expect from Biden and Company? At the risk of having egg, if not a whole omelet, on my face, let me take a shot.

Giants 400 | Dec 16, 2020

Download a PDF of all 2020 Giants 400 Rankings

This 70-page PDF features AEC firm rankings across 51 building sectors, disciplines, and specialty services.

Architects | Dec 14, 2020

2021 AIA Gold Medal awarded to Edward Mazria

The Gold Medal honors an individual whose significant body of work has had a lasting influence on the theory and practice of architecture.

Healthcare Facilities | Dec 10, 2020

The Weekly show: The future of medical office buildings, and virtual internship programs

This week on The Weekly show, BD+C editors spoke with leaders from SMRT Architects and Engineers and Stantec about the future of medical office buildings, and virtual internship programs

Multifamily Housing | Dec 4, 2020

The Weekly show: Designing multifamily housing for COVID-19, and trends in historic preservation and adaptive reuse

This week on The Weekly show, BD+C editors spoke with leaders from Page & Turnbull and Grimm + Parker Architects about designing multifamily housing for COVID-19, and trends in historic preservation and adaptive reuse

Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020

2020 Science & Technology Facilities Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the S+T sector

HDR, Jacobs, and Turner head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020

2020 Laboratory Facilities Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. laboratory facilities sector

Affiliated Engineers, HDR, and Skanska top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest laboratory facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020

2020 Industrial Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. industrial buildings sector

Clayco, Jacobs, and Ware Malcomb top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest industrial buildings sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020

2020 Convention Center Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. convention center sector

AECOM, Gensler, and Jacobs head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest convention center sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020

2020 Reconstruction Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. building reconstruction and renovation sector

Gensler, Jacobs, and STO Building Group head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest reconstruction sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021