The 3,800-seat Covelli Multi-Sport Arena at The Ohio State University will not take the place of the Schottenstein Center, where 19,500 can watch a basketball game. What it will do is provide a home for wrestling, volleyball and gymnastics, while also allowing for lectures, concerts, banquets, academic college’s graduation, and similar campus events.
The Covelli Arena project is indicative of a trend among colleges and universities toward mid-size, multi-use arenas that can serve the student body and surrounding community. While large 20,000-seat sports venues aren’t going away, mid-size venues provide advantages the big arenas do not in a time of budget constraints and the need for flexibility.
Obviously, a 5,000- to 6,000-seat arena is easier to fill than a larger facility. Most non-Division I schools – and even many Division I schools – struggle to fill large basketball arenas. Yet they find they can pack a mid-size arena for every event and that the energy level and experience is heightened, because fans are closer to the action. And this holds true for numerous other events that a multi-use arena allows.
Operating costs are another attractive feature of mid-size arenas. They often require a leaner staff, a smaller budget to build and operate, and are much more energy efficient than their larger cousins. Because these buildings can be used continuously, a college or university can operate them much more efficiently.
Often, the sheer scale of mid-size arenas fits better into many campus environments. The challenges of integrating a smaller venue with other campus buildings is much less of a problem than for larger facilities, and the costs of the exterior finish enclosure is more consistent with surrounding buildings is more achievable due the smaller scale.
Finally, mid-size arenas can be more “donor-friendly.” Large venues typically require a big name and a big donor. In contrast, multiple smaller scale donors can fund a significant portion of the cost of a mid-size arena.
While there are clear advantages to mid-size arenas, spectators want the look, feel, taste and smell of a big one. Making a mid-size venue seem larger is a design challenge and requires experience and creativity.
Populous.
For universal access, ideally, mid-size arenas are designed with the main concourse level with surrounding site; by which spectators descend into a lower bowl. The challenge here may be what is below the ground. Thorough evaluation of existing soil conditions and possible high water table can significant impact the design or even cause a new site location to be desired.
Designing a mid-size arena requires architects to depart from the large-arena mindset. Replicating a big-arena environment at a third the size requires a different approach, but also calls for design elements employed in the bigger arenas.
For example, large arenas typically have multiple large entries, while the mid-size arena likely has only one main entry. Architects have a number of options for replicating the “wow factor” of larger venues. Some of these solutions can include an oversized main entry, impactful signage and wayfinding, large scale video technology, open and inviting layout, and other elements that create the same drama and fan experience.
Center-hung scoreboards are typically too big and too expensive for a mid-size, multi-use venue. One solution is to place larger video boards and scoreboards on two of the sides and to use technology to its fullest, incorporating event-focused variety into the digital video boards and ribbon boards. Higher-end sound systems go a long way as well. The goal remains for spectators to become fully immersed in the event with all their senses.
Pelli Clarke Pelli Architects.
In a mid-sized arena, it’s hard to go too far with environmental branding. Incorporating both still and digital graphics effectively is crucial. If these mid-size arenas are to be more flexible and multipurpose, videoboards become important as a way to switch out digital branding and other graphics based on individual sport and public focused events.
Multi-use arenas also require flexibility in seating. One way to capture a big-venue feel is to encircle the entire perimeter with seats. A 60 percent to 40 percent mix of permanent vs. retractable seating, with fixed seats at the upper reaches of the bowl and retractable seating toward the floor is one way to accomplish this. That allows the event floor area to be opened up for varied sized events that need more space and less seating, such as an exhibit or gymnastics meet.
Building codes can also present a challenge. Codes that dictate construction type, smoke evacuation and egress apply to large and smaller buildings alike. Because the costs of meeting those codes is comparable for each, code fulfillment can eat up a larger proportion of the mid-size venue’s total budget if one does not strategize on this early in the design process.
While mid-size arenas are complex and can be subject to challenging building codes, there are ways to lessen the impact. For example, a successful solution is to design these arenas to a type A4, one-story with a basement classification; this can significantly reduce fire proofing requirements and allows it to be considered an unlimited area building. Such an approach can save a lot of budget costs, depending on the venue, allowing more dollars to be used for the building program.
These projects are exciting, flexible and sustainable. While they present challenges, the advantages are such that mid-size, multi-use arenas will continue to grow in popularity well into the future.
Troy Sherrard has more than 20 years of architectural design leadership in recreational, health/wellness, community, athletic and student focused projects, giving him an in-depth understanding of the specific design issues and solutions involved in creating state-of-the-art facilities. He specializes in managing and leading all aspects of the design process to construction with a focus on sustainable design integration and team collaboration.
Related Stories
University Buildings | Jan 30, 2023
How wellness is reshaping college recreation centers
Moody Nolan, a specialist in the design of college recreation centers, has participated in the evolution toward wellness on college campuses.
Sports and Recreational Facilities | Jan 26, 2023
Miami’s motorsport ‘country club’ to build sleek events center
Designed by renowned Italian design firm Pininfarina and with Revuelta as architect, The Event Campus at The Concours Club will be the first and only motorsport-based event campus located within minutes of a major metro area.
Sports and Recreational Facilities | Jan 24, 2023
Nashville boasts the largest soccer-specific stadium in the U.S. and Canada
At 30,105 seats and 530,000 sf, GEODIS Park, which opened in 2022, is the largest soccer-specific stadium in the U.S. and Canada. Created by design firms Populous and HASTINGS in collaboration with the Metro Nashville Sports Authority, GEODIS Park serves as the home of the Nashville Soccer Club as well as a venue for performances and events.
Sports and Recreational Facilities | Dec 15, 2022
Community centers reinforce a town or city’s sense of place
The intersection of a community with its natural surroundings is one key to a successful design of community centers, according to a new 24-page paper titled “Creating a Wellness Culture,” about the benefits of this building type, cowritten by HMC Architects’ Civic Practice Leader Kyle Peterson, and Director of Design James Krueger, who used three of their firm’s recent projects to buttress their thesis.
Retail Centers | Nov 29, 2022
'Social' tenants play a vital role in the health of the retail center market
After a long Covid-induced period when the public avoided large gatherings, owners of malls and retail lifestyle centers are increasingly focused on attracting tenants that provide opportunities for socialization. Pent-up demand for experiences involving gatherings of people is fueling renovations and redesigns of large retail developments.
Giants 400 | Nov 8, 2022
Top 75 Sports Facility Engineering and EA Firms for 2022
Alfa Tech, AECOM, ME Engineers, and Walter P Moore head the ranking of the nation's largest sports facility engineering and engineering/architecture (EA) firms for 2022, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Nov 8, 2022
Top 110 Sports Facility Architecture and AE Firms for 2022
Populous, HOK, Gensler, and Perkins and Will top the ranking of the nation's largest sports facility architecture and architecture/engineering (AE) firms for 2022, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Nov 8, 2022
Top 60 Sports Facility Contractors and CM Firms for 2022
AECOM, Mortenson, Clark Group, and Turner Construction top the ranking of the nation's largest sports facility contractors and construction management (CM) firms for 2022, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.
Sports and Recreational Facilities | Nov 7, 2022
Gilbane, Turner, Populous tapped to design and build new Buffalo Bills stadium
The joint venture of Gilbane Building Company and Turner Construction Company, in association with 34 Group, has been selected to provide construction management of the planned new NFL stadium for the Buffalo Bills in Orchard Park, N.Y. The project team also includes the project management firm, Legends Project Development, and Populous as the designer.
Sports and Recreational Facilities | Sep 8, 2022
Chicago Bears unveil preliminary master plan for suburban stadium district
As the 2022 NFL season kicks off, the league’s original franchise is fortifying plans to leave its landmark lakefront stadium for a multi-billion-dollar mixed-use stadium district in northwest suburban Arlington Heights.