According to a new report from Mid-America Real Estate Corp.’s Urban Team, much of Chicago lacks the type of product that today’s downsized big box retailers—or “mid-box”—are looking for.
“Retailers’ footprints are shrinking,” says Mid-America Principal Dan Tausk, author of the report. “From Wal-Mart to Best Buy to Office Depot, we continue to see a national trend toward shrinking square footage, which is expanding the vernacular from ‘super’ or ‘mega’ stores to include ‘market,’ ‘express’ and ‘neighborhood’ stores. If that trend continues—and I expect it to—then we’ve got a real lack of product to offer them in most of urban Chicago.”
Because of the national trend in retailer downsizing, Mid-America undertook its first “Urban Chicago Mid-Box Retail Study” this summer to create a better barometer of supply and demand in this sector. The team defined City limits and all directly neighboring suburbs into eight zones roughly following existing retail trade areas.
The team then examined existing and vacant space for stores between 15,000 and 50,000-sf, excluding proposed new development that hadn’t been delivered. To get a clearer picture of category activity, the team also excluded Chicago’s dense penetration of urban drugstores, typically 10,000 to 14,000-sf, but included the newer large format “market” drugstores that are between 25,000 and 30,000-sf. The study uncovered nearly 11.2 million square feet of existing supply in the mid-box category, or 389 total spaces. It also discovered a vacancy rate in this size category at 7%, with strong absorption of existing vacancy.
While it was not surprising to find that Central City (Zone 1)—with State Street, Michigan Avenue and Lincoln Park—carries 34% of the mid-box supply and only 8.6 % of the population, it was a surprise for Tausk to see that pockets of densely populated, high income submarkets such as Lincoln Square, River Forest, Streeterville, West Loop and Bucktown have virtually no mid-box retail supply in this size range. While Zone 5 (the Northeast City) holds the highest percentage of the population in the study, 20.4%, it holds only 9.5% of the mid-box supply.
“The average amount of mid-box retail in urban Chicago is 3.5 square feet/person,” says Tausk., “Zone 1 (Central City) shows 14.6 square feet/person while Zone 5 shows the lowest in Chicago of 1.2 square feet/person. That’s a wide disparity of haves and have-nots.”
He says the residential density in Zone 5 is obviously high enough to support more retail with residents. But he suggests that because the price of land here is high and land size is limited, retailers are pushed to accept multi-level buildings, which are lacking in this zone. “Right now, it’s difficult for them to expand here, despite the desirable demographics,” he says.
Overall, according to the report, five of the eight zones show that almost every category of mid-box retail is underserved for similar reasons -- from grocery and apparel to electronics and discount. The three zones that are doing best are Central City (Zone 1) with 14.6 square feet/person, Near Southwest Suburban (Zone 7) with 5.7 square feet/person, and Near West Suburban (Zone 8) with 4.4 square feet/person.
As was similarly indicated in Mid-America’s Urban Grocery Study last year, the West City (Zone 2) is the most underserved with only 16 mid-box retail stores or 4.11% of Chicago’s total supply. “In addition,” Tausk says, “the West Side has the least amount of category options. While each zone’s dominant category is grocery, that category averages only + 20% Citywide. In the West City, however, grocery accounts for 53% of the mid-box retail, showing a void of other shopping options.”
Other category highlights:
- Zone 1 (Central City) showed a dominating penetration of apparel versus all other zones combined. State Street and Michigan Avenue, and Lincoln Park carry the most supply. Zone 1 also dominates in the home furnishings category with 12 mid-box retail stores, as well as electronics with 9 and office supply with 6.
- Zone 2 (West City), as already noted above, is void of shopping options in most categories other than grocery. There is plenty of affordable, developable land, but lower incomes and high crime rates continue to stall development.
- Zone 5 (S/SE City) has a large number of grocers totaling 35% of all mid-box categories in that zone. Category sales clearly bleed from the south and southeast side to the Southwest City or Southwest suburbs, due to lack of options in other retail categories.
“In conclusion,” says Tausk. “There’s demand for mid-box growth in urban Chicago, despite a tough economy.” However, existing supply is tight everywhere and almost non-existent in the most attractive zones. He adds that there are three main considerations retailers will be forced to evaluate in the process.
- Retailers with expansion/rollouts for Chicago will need to continue to think creatively, finding opportunities in multi-levels, mezzanines or even smaller stores to meet future demand.
- Retailers can expect rents to remain high in the mid-size sector due to obvious lack of supply and low vacancy.
- Future opportunity in this mid-box size category may best come from downsizing / sublease space or the splitting of outdated larger footprints and future bankruptcies of other retailers.
Absorption in this size range is strong and happens quickly with greater than a half-million square feet of leasing currently proposed in existing space.
From the supply side, Tausk says that based on this supply/demand dynamic, “we can expect to see a slow but steady flow of new projects in this size range. Several developments are underway currently that are focused on the 15,000 to 50,000-sf user. Mid-box retailers such as Ross Dress for Less, Marshalls, Michaels, WalMart Market, hhGregg and Planet Fitness continue to pursue active expansion across Chicagoland.” +
Related Stories
Architects | Dec 9, 2019
Jonathan Moody promoted to CEO of Moody Nolan
New four-member Executive Team also named.
Big Data | Dec 4, 2019
AEC data's coming out party
AEC firms are finally putting to use project information they’ve been storing in their computers for years.
Building Owners | Dec 2, 2019
What building owners and AEC teams need to know about New York’s Climate Mobilization Act
On April 18, 2019, the New York City Council passed the Climate Mobilization Act, a suite of laws aimed to meet the city’s commitment to achieving carbon neutrality by 2050.
| Nov 26, 2019
Steinberg Hart and Holzman Moss Bottino Architecture combine to elevate design, expand opportunities and strengthen client relationships
This union creates a national architecture firm with enhanced design capabilities and expertise.
| Nov 8, 2019
Philadelphia architecture firm EwingCole acquires Baltimore firm Gaudreau
Philadelphia architecture firm EwingCole acquires Baltimore firm Gaudreau.
Multifamily Housing | Nov 7, 2019
Multifamily construction market remains strong heading into 2020
Fewer than one in 10 AEC firms doing multifamily work reported a decrease in proposal activity in Q3 2019, according to a PSMJ report.
Architects | Oct 29, 2019
Top takeaways from the Lean Construction Institute Congress 2019
More than 1,600 Lean experts gathered in Texas this month for LCI Congress 2019. Here are key takeaways from the event.
Giants 400 | Oct 25, 2019
Top 50 Airport Sector Architecture Firms for 2019
AECOM, Gensler, HNTB, Corgan, and HOK top the rankings of the nation's largest airport terminal sector architecture and architecture engineering (AE) firms, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2019 Giants 300 Report.
Giants 400 | Oct 24, 2019
Top 125 Retail Architecture Firms for 2019
CallisonRTKL, Gensler, MG2, NELSON, and Stantec top the rankings of the nation's largest retail sector architecture and architecture engineering (AE) firms, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2019 Giants 300 Report.
Architects | Oct 11, 2019
SMPS report tracks how AEC firms are utilizing marketing technology tools
With thousands of MarTech tools and apps on the market, design and construction firms are struggling to keep up.