flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Massachusetts Supreme Court clarifies building code liability issue on mixed-use projects

Massachusetts Supreme Court clarifies building code liability issue on mixed-use projects

Distinct portions of a building can be considered separate structures


By BD+C Staff | April 18, 2014
Photo: Albert Herring via Wikimedia Commons/Flickr
Photo: Albert Herring via Wikimedia Commons/Flickr

The Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court recently ruled that distinct portions of a mixed-used building may be treated as distinct and different structures under the state building code. The ruling clarifies more than 40 years of sometimes contradictory decisions.

The case pertained to a resident of a mixed-use building who fell and was seriously injured when a guardrail on a staircase broke. A key question in the case was: “does a building containing both commercial and residential components fall entirely under the section of the state building code applying to commercial buildings?”

The court said that it was significant that resident's apartment wasn't in a commercial portion of the building with the staircase being separate from the commercial section of the structure. The court wrote: “In some cases, the term ‘building’ may encompass only a portion of a larger structure.”

 

(http://www.bizjournals.com/boston/news/2014/04/10/massachusetts-supreme-judicial-court-clarifies.html)

Related Stories

| Sep 1, 2011

Project Aims to Automate Code Compliance Assessment

FIATECH, a consortium of owners from the industrial, power, and retail markets that build large structures, launched a project this year to validate the use of automation technology for code compliance assessment, and to accelerate the regulatory approval process using building models. Long-term objectives include the development of an extensive, open-source rule set library that is approved by industry and regulatory bodies for use by technology developers and code officials.

| Sep 1, 2011

EPA Says Additional Lead Paint Cleaning Rules Not Necessary

The EPA has concluded that current Lead: Renovation, Repair, and Painting Program (LRRP) cleaning requirements and lead-safe work regulations are sufficient to protect the public from lead dust hazards. “Our members have been instrumental in contacting legislators to detail the detrimental impact of the current LRRP," says Richard Walker, American Architectural Manufacturers Association’s president and CEO. “This collective industry voice has prompted the EPA to make the responsible decision to refrain from adding further, unnecessary costs to homeowners under the current economic climate."http://www.aamanet.org/news/1/10/0/all/603/aama-commends-its-members-congress-for-vacating-lrrp-clearance-rule

| Aug 11, 2010

Best AEC Firms of 2011/12

Later this year, we will launch Best AEC Firms 2012. We’re looking for firms that create truly positive workplaces for their AEC professionals and support staff. Keep an eye on this page for entry information. +

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category


Resiliency

U.S. is reducing floodplain development in most areas

The perception that the U.S. has not been able to curb development in flood-prone areas is mostly inaccurate, according to new research from climate adaptation experts. A national survey of floodplain development between 2001 and 2019 found that fewer structures were built in floodplains than might be expected if cities were building at random.



halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021