flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

M&A activity down in 2013 among architecture, engineering firms: Report

M&A activity down in 2013 among architecture, engineering firms: Report

Many of the firms that have traditionally been the most active buyers in the industry spent 2013 mostly on the sidelines. 


By Morrissey Goodale | February 5, 2014
In 2013, consultant Morrissey Goodale observed 168 sales of U.S.-based architecture and engineering (“A/E”) firms – down nearly 7% from the record 180 sales of U.S.-based A/E firms in 2012. Similarly, just 107 international A/E firms sold in 2013, a drop of more than 20% from the 135 deals in 2012. Yet 2013 was anticipated by many to be another break-neck, record-setting year for A/E industry M&A. The economy continued to recover, performance at many firms climbed back to pre-recession levels, and things were looking up for a year of rapid deal-making. So what caused industry dealmakers to slow down after living 2012 in the fast lane? 
 
·       Owners rode the (modest) wave. As the economy persisted to creep toward respectability in 2013 and value continued to build in A/E firms, prospective sellers showed an increasing reluctance to jump at offers. Instead, they were inclined to take the longer view of building a track record of solid performance, desiring to sell at the high (or at least higher) water mark that many A/E firm leaders believe is still on the horizon.
 
·       Tax-driven deal spike late in 2012. U.S. sellers seemed to be certain they needed to sell in 2012 to minimize capital gains which were anticipated to climb in 2013. We observed an unusually high flurry of deal activity in late 2012, seemingly driven by a desire to get deals done by year end. With tax rates steady for the foreseeable future, we anticipate the competitive environment, age, ownership and leadership transition, and other factors will drive owners’ desires to sell their firms.
 
·       Large firms took a breather in 2013. Many of the firms that have traditionally been the most active buyers in the industry spent 2013 mostly on the sidelines. Firms like AECOM, SNC-Lavalin, Genivar (now WSP Global), IBI Group, ARCADIS, and URS, among others, slowed or stopped their M&A programs in 2013. This decline may be attributable to the need to integrate the firms they acquired over the last few years, work on internal initiatives, or simply being unable to find and close deals that met their strategic needs at appropriate valuations in 2013.
 

About Morrissey Goodale LLC

Based in Newton, Mass., Morrissey Goodale LLC is a leading management consulting and research firm serving the architecture, engineering, and Construction (AEC) industry. 

Related Stories

Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020

2020 K-12 School Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. K-12 school facilities sector

AECOM, Gilbane, and PBK head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest K-12 school facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020

2020 Sports Facilities Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. sports facilities sector

Kimley-Horn, Mortenson, and Populous top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest sports facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020

2020 Office Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. office building sector

Gensler, Jacobs, and STO Building Group head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest office building sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020

2020 Hotel Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. hospitality sector

Gensler, Jacobs, and Suffolk Construction top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest hotel sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020

2020 Healthcare Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. healthcare facilities sector

HDR, Jacobs, and Turner top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest healthcare facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020

2020 Government Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. government buildings sector

HNTB, Jacobs, and Turner top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest government sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020

2020 Cultural Facilities Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. cultural facilities sector

AECOM, Arup, and Populous head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest cultural facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Dec 2, 2020

2020 Retail Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. retail building sector

Gensler, Jacobs, and PCL Construction top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest retail sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Dec 2, 2020

2020 University Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the higher education sector

Gensler, AECOM, and Turner Construction top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest university sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Dec 2, 2020

2020 Multifamily Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. multifamily building sector

Clark Group, Humphreys & Partners Architects, and Kimley-Horn head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest multifamily building sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category

Warehouses

California bill would limit where distribution centers can be built

A bill that passed the California legislature would limit where distribution centers can be located and impose other rules aimed at reducing air pollution and traffic. Assembly Bill 98 would tighten building standards for new warehouses and ban heavy diesel truck traffic next to sensitive sites including homes, schools, parks and nursing homes.




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021