flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Low-income housing doesn’t lower neighborhood housing values

Codes and Standards

Low-income housing doesn’t lower neighborhood housing values

A Trulia study contradicts longstanding fears.


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | January 4, 2017

PIxabay Public Domain

An analysis by real-estate listing website Trulia in the 20 highest-priced U.S. housing markets from 1996 to 2006 found that residential property values near low-income housing were not significantly impacted. 

The study looked at more than 3,000 low-income housing projects and their surrounding neighborhoods. Home values within 2,000 feet of low-income housing projects were largely the same as homes between 2,000 and 4,000 feet from these projects.

Some of the least affordable markets have experienced resistance to building affordable housing, with some opponents claiming these projects depreciate nearby home values. Opposition to affordable housing development has surfaced in tight housing markets across the country such as San Francisco, New York, and Seattle.

San Jose, Calif., was the most aggressive in adding low-income housing units (7.81 per 1,000 people) during the decade, Trulia says. By contrast, Oakland, (0.52 per 1,000 residents) added the fewest units per capita.

Of the 20 markets examined, Denver was the only metro area where homes located near low-income housing projects experienced an increase in price per square foot after a project was completed. In Boston and Cambridge, Mass., however, low-income housing projects had a negative effect on the value of nearby homes, suggesting a region-specific market effect. Affordable housing projects in most of the other areas had no significant impact on home values.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | May 1, 2015

Department of Energy asks for feedback on cost-effectiveness of building energy codes

DOE’s RFI wants input on how to improve methodology on cost assessment.

Codes and Standards | Apr 22, 2015

New York State renews design-build authority

Five state agencies are allowed to use design-build on certain projects.

Codes and Standards | Apr 22, 2015

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. 

Codes and Standards | Apr 22, 2015

GBCI renamed Green Business Certification Inc.

The name change reflects the organization’s expanded certification and credentialing services.

Multifamily Housing | Apr 16, 2015

Seattle’s size restriction on micro apartments blamed for rise in rents

Seattle’s city planner recently said that the council’s new rules have made small apartments more expensive to build and charged the board with “overreaching” and not giving micro-housing “a fair shake.”

Green | Apr 16, 2015

New version of Building Energy Data Exchange Specification launched

BEDES is a dictionary that facilitates consistent exchange of building characteristics and energy use data between tools and databases in the building energy efficiency sector.

Codes and Standards | Apr 16, 2015

New York tops U.S. cities in walkability

Revitalization pushes Detroit and New Orleans up the rankings

Green | Apr 14, 2015

USGBC will recognize energy and water standards for the Living Building Challenge

This move means that projects achieving the energy and water requirements in Living Building Challenge will be considered as technically equivalent to LEED.

Codes and Standards | Apr 14, 2015

New York City preparing new codes for evacuation elevators

New York City’s Fire, Buildings, and City Planning Departments in New York are writing rules to govern occupant-evacuation elevators, reflecting a change in philosophy of how to evacuate people from skyscrapers in an emergency.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021