flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Length of North American construction disputes continues to increase

Codes and Standards

Length of North American construction disputes continues to increase

They already far exceed global average.


By Peter fabris, Contributing Editor | July 16, 2018

The average time taken to resolve construction disputes in North America increased to an average of 17.7 months in 2017, an increase of two months from 2016, according to a report released by Arcadis.

Length of disputes in the region far exceeded the global average, the report says. Globally, the length of time to resolve disputes stood at 14.8 months, a one month increase over 2016.

The average value of North American disputes decreased to US $19M in 2017 from $21M in 2016. Globally, the figure stood at US $43.4M, up from $32.5M in 2016.

“Failure to properly administer the contract” remained the most common cause of construction disputes globally, and “errors and/or omissions in the contract documentation” remained the most common cause in North America. With positive economic drivers and larger and more complex projects anticipated this year, there is a critical need to embrace more sophisticated risk management and claims avoidance techniques, including leveraging digitalization, Arcadis says.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Aug 12, 2019

New curtain wall design guidelines released

AAMA document includes mandatory language, optional language, and detailed technical commentary.

Codes and Standards | Aug 9, 2019

Cities modify density zoning to spur more affordable housing projects

Solutions include eliminating single-family zoning and allowing taller apartments in higher-density zones.

Codes and Standards | Aug 8, 2019

More designers focusing on acoustic properties of buildings

Recognition that structures should be acoustically satisfying.

Codes and Standards | Aug 6, 2019

New technology, aligning training with local trends among keys to workforce development

Construction industry must also invest in training, recruiting high school students.

Codes and Standards | Aug 1, 2019

Planners, city official rethink parking requirements on new projects

Reducing number of parking spots frees up land for ‘more purposeful’ uses.

Codes and Standards | Jul 31, 2019

USGBC-LA chooses first ‘Net Zero Accelerator’ technologies

Wide range of solutions address numerous environmental challenges.

Codes and Standards | Jul 30, 2019

Solar brokerage will provide financing for small/medium businesses

First to fund solar for smaller-scale commercial operations.

Codes and Standards | Jul 29, 2019

ASCE group unveils structural safety database

Confidential reporting on structural failures, near misses, and other incidents.

Codes and Standards | Jul 26, 2019

Floating landscape infrastructure wins top ASCE innovation prize

Climate resiliency a key theme of entrants.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category


Reconstruction & Renovation

Movement to protect historic buildings raises sharp criticism

While the movement to preserve historic buildings has widespread support, it also has some sharp critics with well-funded opposition groups springing up in recent years. Some opponents are linked to the Stand Together Foundation, founded and bankrolled by the Koch family’s conservative philanthropic organization, according to a column in Governing magazine.



halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021