flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

IPD contract saves time and money for cancer center [2014 Building Team Awards]

IPD contract saves time and money for cancer center [2014 Building Team Awards]

Partners share the risk and reward of extreme collaboration on this LEED Silver project, which relies heavily on Lean principles.


By Julie S. Higginbotham, Senior Editor | July 20, 2014
The new Lawrence + Memorial Hospital Cancer Center will allow patients to receiv
The new Lawrence + Memorial Hospital Cancer Center will allow patients to receive comprehensive oncology services in a single lo

For its Waterford, Conn., Cancer Center, a comprehensive treatment facility affiliated with Dana-Farber Community Cancer Care, Lawrence + Memorial Hospital decided to try something new: true three-party Integrated Project Delivery.

The contractual agreement covered L+M, architecture/engineering firm TRO JB, and construction manager Suffolk Construction, with programming, design, and construction all informed by Lean principles.

To further extend the collaborative theme, this three-party project management team invited three trade partners to participate in an incentive compensation layer, involving a pool consisting of at-risk potential profits.

TRO JB, Suffolk, and three handpicked HVAC/plumbing, electrical, and site work subs would participate in the ICL. If the project came in over budget or exceeded the schedule, the ICL profit pool would be tapped to pay the penalties. If the facility came in under budget or ahead of schedule, the ICL group would get the profit pool plus 50% of the savings, with the hospital pocketing the remaining savings.

Bronze Award
Project Summary

Lawrence + Memorial Hospital Cancer Center
Waterford, Conn.

BUILDING TEAM
Submitting firm: Suffolk Construction (GC/CM)
Owner/developer: Lawrence + Memorial Hospital 
Architect, MEP/FP: TRO JB
Structural: Simpson Gumpertz & Heger
Civil: DiCesare-Bentley Engineers

GENERAL INFORMATION
Project size: 47,000 sf
Construction cost: $24 million (IPD contract value $34.5 million)
Construction period: May 2012 to September 2013
Delivery method: Tri-party integrated project delivery

Early collaboration on the design, schedule, budget, and quality goals was a must for making the plan work. Using 3P (Production Preparation Process) Lean design and pull planning tools, the Building Team was able to make key decisions efficiently. Input from about 70 Cancer Center stakeholders—including administration, medical staff, support staff, patient advocates, and partners from Dana-Farber—was solicited in an intense three-day 3P charrette, which resulted in schematic draft floor plans. 

Only minor changes were needed after this point, testifying to the effectiveness of the event. (The most significant contract alteration, requested by L+M as a value-added item, was a geothermal well field system that will pay for itself in just a few years.)

A co-location center set up in two of L+M’s hospital conference rooms was made available to the Building Team for the duration of the project. This home base proved crucial to ensuring efficient communication and also provided a convenient setting for stakeholder evaluation of mockups. 

As a result of the collaborative efforts, the overall project schedule was reduced by six months, and the facility came in $1.2 million under budget. Actual construction was completed in only 10 months, meeting a “stretch goal” previously set by the client. Streamlined front-end decisions played an important role, including an RFI process that was 80% shorter than the client had previously experienced.

Building Team Awards judges were impressed with the participants’ ability to weigh wants and needs and craft a facility that achieved ambitious goals. The client has engaged Suffolk and TRO JB for a second IPD contract, this time to renovate a three-story medical office building. As with healthcare itself, new ideas about delivery are proving indispensable to positive outcomes.   

Related Stories

Giants 400 | Aug 6, 2015

GIANTS 300 REPORT: Top 115 Healthcare Architecture Firms

HDR, Stantec, and Perkins+Will top Building Design+Construction's 2015 ranking of the largest healthcare architecture and architecture/engineering firms in the U.S. 

Giants 400 | Aug 6, 2015

HEALTHCARE AEC GIANTS: Hospital and medical office construction facing a slow but steady recovery

Construction of hospitals and medical offices is expected to shake off its lethargy in 2015 and recover modestly over the next several years, according to BD+C's 2015 Giants 300 report.

Codes and Standards | Aug 6, 2015

ConsensusDocs releases new CM agency contract standard agreement

For use when owner acts as the construction manager, hires a construction manager, or uses multiple prime contractors

Giants 400 | Aug 5, 2015

GIANTS 300 REPORT: Top 135 Office Sector Architecture Firms

Gensler, HOK, and Perkins+Will top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest office sector architecture and architecture/engineering firms. 

Giants 400 | Aug 5, 2015

OFFICE SECTOR GIANTS: Today’s workplace design must appeal to Millennials’ ‘activity-based’ lifestyle

Office market AEC Giants discuss the latest trends workplace design, and the state of the office construction sector.

Giants 400 | Aug 5, 2015

GIANTS 300 REPORT: Top 37 Engineering/Architecture Firms

Jacobs, AECOM, and Thornton Tomasetti head Building Design+Construction's 2015 ranking of the largest engineering/architecture firms in the United States. 

Giants 400 | Aug 5, 2015

ENGINEERING GIANTS: Profits, revenue on the rise at U.S. engineering firms as economy sputters back to life

The vast majority of engineering firms are decidedly bullish on revenue growth for 2015, and profitability is nearing a six-year high, according to BD+C's 2015 Giants 300 report.  

Giants 400 | Aug 4, 2015

GIANTS 300 REPORT: Top 64 Architecture/Engineering Firms

Stantec, HOK, and Callison RTKL top Building Design+Construction's 2015 ranking of the largest architecture/engineering firms in the United States. 

Giants 400 | Aug 4, 2015

GIANTS 300 REPORT: Top 106 Architecture Firms

Gensler, Perkins+Will, and Kohn Pedersen Fox top Building Design+Construction's 2015 ranking of the largest architecture firms in the United States. 

Giants 400 | Aug 4, 2015

ARCHITECTURE GIANTS: 21 practice management innovations from architecture Giants

Design firms have gone all out with management innovations in the last year. Check out which ones might work for your firm.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category

Great Solutions

41 Great Solutions for architects, engineers, and contractors

AI ChatBots, ambient computing, floating MRIs, low-carbon cement, sunshine on demand, next-generation top-down construction. These and 35 other innovations make up our 2024 Great Solutions Report, which highlights fresh ideas and innovations from leading architecture, engineering, and construction firms.




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021