flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

IPD contract saves time and money for cancer center [2014 Building Team Awards]

IPD contract saves time and money for cancer center [2014 Building Team Awards]

Partners share the risk and reward of extreme collaboration on this LEED Silver project, which relies heavily on Lean principles.


By Julie S. Higginbotham, Senior Editor | July 20, 2014
The new Lawrence + Memorial Hospital Cancer Center will allow patients to receiv
The new Lawrence + Memorial Hospital Cancer Center will allow patients to receive comprehensive oncology services in a single lo

For its Waterford, Conn., Cancer Center, a comprehensive treatment facility affiliated with Dana-Farber Community Cancer Care, Lawrence + Memorial Hospital decided to try something new: true three-party Integrated Project Delivery.

The contractual agreement covered L+M, architecture/engineering firm TRO JB, and construction manager Suffolk Construction, with programming, design, and construction all informed by Lean principles.

To further extend the collaborative theme, this three-party project management team invited three trade partners to participate in an incentive compensation layer, involving a pool consisting of at-risk potential profits.

TRO JB, Suffolk, and three handpicked HVAC/plumbing, electrical, and site work subs would participate in the ICL. If the project came in over budget or exceeded the schedule, the ICL profit pool would be tapped to pay the penalties. If the facility came in under budget or ahead of schedule, the ICL group would get the profit pool plus 50% of the savings, with the hospital pocketing the remaining savings.

Bronze Award
Project Summary

Lawrence + Memorial Hospital Cancer Center
Waterford, Conn.

BUILDING TEAM
Submitting firm: Suffolk Construction (GC/CM)
Owner/developer: Lawrence + Memorial HospitalĀ 
Architect, MEP/FP: TRO JB
Structural: Simpson Gumpertz & Heger
Civil: DiCesare-Bentley Engineers

GENERAL INFORMATION
Project size: 47,000 sf
Construction cost: $24 million (IPD contract value $34.5 million)
Construction period: May 2012 to September 2013
Delivery method: Tri-party integrated project delivery

Early collaboration on the design, schedule, budget, and quality goals was a must for making the plan work. Using 3P (Production Preparation Process) Lean design and pull planning tools, the Building Team was able to make key decisions efficiently. Input from about 70 Cancer Center stakeholdersā€”including administration, medical staff, support staff, patient advocates, and partners from Dana-Farberā€”was solicited in an intense three-day 3P charrette, which resulted in schematic draft floor plans.Ā 

Only minor changes were needed after this point, testifying to the effectiveness of the event. (The most significant contract alteration, requested by L+M as a value-added item, was a geothermal well field system that will pay for itself in just a few years.)

A co-location center set up in two of L+Mā€™s hospital conference rooms was made available to the Building Team for the duration of the project. This home base proved crucial to ensuring efficient communication and also provided a convenient setting for stakeholder evaluation of mockups.Ā 

As a result of the collaborative efforts, the overall project schedule was reduced by six months, and the facility came in $1.2 million under budget. Actual construction was completed in only 10 months, meeting a ā€œstretch goalā€ previously set by the client. Streamlined front-end decisions played an important role, including an RFI process that was 80% shorter than the client had previously experienced.

Building Team Awards judges were impressed with the participantsā€™ ability to weigh wants and needs and craft a facility that achieved ambitious goals. The client has engaged Suffolk and TRO JB for a second IPD contract, this time to renovate a three-story medical office building. As with healthcare itself, new ideas about delivery are proving indispensable to positive outcomes. Ā Ā 

Related Stories

Giants 400 | Dec 16, 2020

Download a PDF of all 2020 Giants 400 Rankings

This 70-page PDF features AEC firm rankings across 51 building sectors, disciplines, and specialty services.

Architects | Dec 14, 2020

2021 AIA Gold Medal awarded to Edward Mazria

The Gold Medal honors an individual whose significant body of work has had a lasting influence on the theory and practice of architecture.

Healthcare Facilities | Dec 10, 2020

The Weekly show: The future of medical office buildings, and virtual internship programs

This week on The Weekly show, BD+C editors spoke with leaders from SMRT Architects and Engineers and Stantec about theĀ future of medical office buildings, and virtual internship programs

Multifamily Housing | Dec 4, 2020

The Weekly show: Designing multifamily housing for COVID-19, and trends in historic preservation and adaptive reuse

This week on The Weekly show, BD+C editors spoke with leaders from Page & Turnbull and Grimm + Parker Architects about designing multifamily housing for COVID-19, and trends in historic preservation and adaptive reuse

Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020

2020 Science & Technology Facilities Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the S+T sector

HDR, Jacobs, and Turner head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T)Ā facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020

2020 Laboratory Facilities Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. laboratory facilities sector

Affiliated Engineers, HDR, and Skanska top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest laboratory facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020

2020 Industrial Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. industrial buildings sector

Clayco, Jacobs, and Ware Malcomb top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest industrial buildings sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020

2020 Convention Center Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. convention center sector

AECOM, Gensler, and Jacobs head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest convention center sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020

2020 Reconstruction Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. building reconstruction and renovation sector

Gensler, Jacobs, and STO Building Group head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest reconstruction sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020

2020 K-12 School Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. K-12 school facilities sector

AECOM, Gilbane, and PBK head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest K-12 school facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




Great Solutions

41 Great Solutions for architects, engineers, and contractors

AI ChatBots, ambient computing, floating MRIs, low-carbon cement, sunshine on demand, next-generation top-down construction. These and 35 other innovations make up our 2024 Great Solutions Report, which highlights fresh ideas and innovations from leading architecture, engineering, and construction firms.

halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021

Ā