Much of the spirited discussion around LEED v4 has been centered on the Materials & Resources Credit, Building Products Disclosure and Optimization – Material Ingredients—especially with regard to building products containing substances that could be toxic to humans or the environment.
At least one voice in the wilderness is shouting for greater attention to another huge change in LEED: the shift to ASHRAE 90.1-2010 as the new reference standard for Energy & Atmosphere prerequisites and credits. “That’s the real story in LEED v4, from an MEP point of view,” says Scott Bowman, PE, LEED Fellow. “The change to 90.1-2010 makes v4 much more rigorous.”
Bowman, who recently retired as Corporate Sustainability Leader at KJWW Engineering Consultants (where he was involved in 119 LEED-certified projects), says Building Teams need to start warning their clients that it’s going to be a lot tougher to reach LEED Gold or Platinum under v4. He says that some of the 14 LEED Platinum projects that he worked on at KJWW might barely squeak by with a Silver or Gold rating under v4. Projects that were Silver or Gold might not even reach certified.
“We need to be working on our clients’ expectations now, because the changes that are coming are going to be significant,” says Bowman, who recently established his own consultancy, Integrated Design + Energy Advisors, known as IDEA. “Our clients should know that we may have to do a couple more runs on the energy modeling for the design”—and that could mean additional fees.
Raising the bar for commissioning in LEED v4
Engineering consultant Scott Bowman says commissioning is a whole new game in LEED v4. The fundamental commissioning and verification prerequisite has added design review as a requirement, but he’s not sanguine about the methodology. “It could mean that an engineer on the project could be reviewing the work of another engineer from the same firm,” says Bowman. “For the review to be of value, there should be an independent third party.”
The Cx prerequisite also requires the Building Team to prepare an operations and maintenance plan, somewhat like a systems manual but less extensive. Bowman warns that preparing this document likely will add to the costs of v4 certification. “Clients should understand that your old rule of thumb on commissioning costs may be out of date.”
Bowman says he’s encouraged by the requirement (in the v4 Cx prerequisite) for exterior enclosures to be included in the owner’s project requirements (OPR) and basis of design. “OPR is the most underutilized management tool in our industry,” he says. “We need to do better OPRs.”
But he’s not crazy about a requirement that a design team member who is not directly involved in the design of the exterior enclosure complete a review of the enclosure design. “It could be just a different person from the same design firm checking the work,” he says. “That’s very squishy.”
Two points are also available under Enhanced Commissioning for envelope commissioning, but Bowman says he is disappointed that some of the MEP services that were required in the Enhanced Cx credit have been put into the Cx prerequisite.
The intent—to give Building Teams a toehold on envelope commissioning—is an honorable one, says Bowman. “I look forward to a future when envelope commissioning is a fundamental, but I don’t think LEED has defined it well enough yet,” he says.
“We had a major jump from 90.1-2004 to 90.1-2010,” says Bowman, a second-generation engineer. He points to data from the Energy Department’s Pacific Northwest National Lab: energy use intensity (EUI) was reduced 4.5% moving from ASHRAE 90.1-2004 to 90.1-2007, but 90.1-2010 brings it down a much more demanding 18.5%.
LEED v4 buildings will have to be 30% better on EUI improvement just to meet the prerequisite, he says, “and they have to go even higher to get EA points.”
Key technical improvements in v4 EA credits, according to Bowman:
• Minimum energy performance has to be 5% above ASHRAE 90.1-2010, 3% for renovation projects; minimum Energy Star rating must be 75 or better.
• Building-level energy metering is now required for all buildings.
• Demand response is now a credit. Projects can earn up to two points for installing systems necessary to participate in a demand response program. Projects located in areas with no demand response program can earn a point by making the building ready to engage in such a program. “The idea of preparing buildings for demand response is a good one,” says Bowman.
Strategies that once were nice-to-haves are now required. “If you have clerestories and skylights, you have to have daylighting controls,” says Bowman. “Before v4, it was a strategy, now it’s a requisite.” Lighting power density is also much more stringent, he says.
Building Teams are going to have to reach higher in their building envelope designs, says Bowman. “You can’t rely on the mechanical/electrical system alone to help you comply with v4,” he warns. “You only get one chance with the envelope. Some of our 100-year-old buildings still have single-pane glass! We need to encourage clients to invest more in good windows, walls, and roofs.”
A similar philosophy guides the use of renewables in LEED v4: the project must meet the requisite energy performance levels before renewables can be applied. “The idea in high performance is: first, use less energy; then, use it efficiently; and then, and only then, make it on site, via renewables,” says Bowman. “You can’t use PVs to make up for a bad building.”
Measurement and verification credits have been heavily modified under v4, in Bowman’s view. “Under LEED 2009, M&V attempted to guide projects to measure energy use on a much more granular basis than before, but it was not implemented very much, and it really was more of an operational credit,” something that should be in LEED EBOM, he says. LEED v4 sets a prerequisite for building-level energy metering. “That’s not going to be a problem for 99% of LEED v4 projects,” says Bowman. The only possible exception: campus projects.
LEED v4 buildings will have to be 30% better on EUI improvement just to meet the new prerequisite. ILLUSTRATION: COURTESY PNNL
Bowman also likes Credit EAc3, Advanced Energy Metering, one of the credits that replaced M&V and can earn a point for metering all energy end uses representing 10% or more of total energy use in the building. Meters must be connected to the building automation system; data must be logged at appropriate intervals and stored for 36 months. “This is a good step, to encourage energy metering,” he says. “The cost of these devices has been coming down dramatically, and this will become standard among higher-level clients.”
Bowman reminds Building Teams to keep their clients posted on the energy components of LEED v4. “The energy side is where the v4 story is,” he says. “If I had a criticism of LEED, it is that we didn’t have as much of a jump in energy requirements between LEED 2.2 and LEED 2009. We really didn’t push the technology that far.”
LEED v4 does.
Scott Bowman (bowmansc.scb@gmail.com) was scheduled to present his views on LEED v4 at BuildingCHICAGO/Greening the Heartland. He will be inducted as a LEED Fellow at Greenbuild on October 23.
Related Stories
Multifamily Housing | Feb 2, 2023
St. Louis’s first transit-oriented multifamily development opens in historic Skinker DeBaliviere neighborhood
St. Louis’s first major transit-oriented, multi-family development recently opened with 287 apartments available for rent. The $71 million Expo at Forest Park project includes a network of pathways to accommodate many modes of transportation including ride share, the region’s Metro Transit system, a trolley line, pedestrian traffic, automobiles, and bike traffic on the 7-mile St. Vincent Greenway Trail.
Giants 400 | Feb 2, 2023
2022 Convention Center Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. convention and conference facilities sector
Clark Group, EUA, KPFF, Populous, TVS, and Walter P Moore top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest convention and conference facilities architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2022 Giants 400 Report.
Multifamily Housing | Feb 1, 2023
Step(1) housing: A new approach to sheltering unhoused people in Redwood City, Calif.
A novel solution to homelessness will open soon in Redwood City, Calif. The compact residential campus employs modular units to create individual sleeping units, most with private bathrooms. The 240 units of housing will be accompanied by shared services and community spaces. Instead of the congregate dorm-style shelters found in many U.S. cities, this approach gives each resident a private, lockable, conditioned sleeping space.
Codes and Standards | Feb 1, 2023
New Jersey to allow private firms to conduct construction inspections
New Jersey recently passed a law that will allow towns to supplement construction code enforcement with help from the private sector. The legislation, which received bipartisan support, also allows municipalities to enter into shared service agreements with neighboring towns for construction inspections.
Sports and Recreational Facilities | Feb 1, 2023
University of Houston opens 'game changer' wellness center at downtown campus
The University of Houston-Downtown (UHD) recently opened its new Wellness & Success Center (WSC). The $39 million, 75,000 sf facility greatly improves the quality of the school’s exercise programs and areas dedicated to them. It also establishes a dynamic core and recognizable landmark for fostering and nurturing an on-campus community, according to a news release from SmithGroup, which designed the building along with HarrisonKornberg Architects.
Giants 400 | Feb 1, 2023
2022 Cultural Facilities Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. cultural facilities sector
Populous, DLR Group, KPFF, Arup, and Turner Construction head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest cultural facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2022 Giants 400 Report. Building types include museums, public libraries, performing arts centers, and concert venues.
Giants 400 | Jan 31, 2023
2022 Retail Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. retail building sector
Gensler, CallisonRTKL, Kimley-Horn, Henderson Engineers, Whiting-Turner Contracting, and Turner Construction top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest retail sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2022 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Jan 31, 2023
2022 Government Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. government buildings sector
Gensler, Jacobs, Hensel Phelps, and Page top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest government sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2022 Giants 400 Report.
Healthcare Facilities | Jan 31, 2023
How to solve humidity issues in hospitals and healthcare facilities
Humidity control is one of the top mechanical issues healthcare clients face. SSR's Lee Nordholm, PE, LEED AP, offers tips for handling humidity issues in hospitals and healthcare facilities.
University Buildings | Jan 30, 2023
How wellness is reshaping college recreation centers
Moody Nolan, a specialist in the design of college recreation centers, has participated in the evolution toward wellness on college campuses.