flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Industry groups petition for change order reform on federal projects

Codes and Standards

Industry groups petition for change order reform on federal projects

Nine design and construction associations ask for assurance that funds available for additional work.


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | April 6, 2015
Industry groups petition for change order reform on federal projects

Photo: Matti Mattila via Wikimedia Commons

Nine associations representing construction contractors, subcontractors, and design professionals petitioned the Office of Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP) to alter how the office handles change orders.

The groups want the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) amended to "make explicit" that before ordering a change to a construction contract, the contracting officer must assure that funds are available to pay for additional work being ordered.

“Our members are facing increasing numbers of instances in which a Contracting Officer will direct a change in the scope of work on a construction project, lacking funds available to pay for the increased costs being imposed upon the contractor,” the associations wrote in a March 18 letter to OFCPP Administrator Anne Rung.

The groups signing the letter included the Design-Build Institute of America, the American Council of Engineering Companies, the American Subcontractors Association, the Associated General Contractors of America, the Mechanical Contractors Association of America, the National Association of Surety Bond Producers, the National Electrical Contractors Association, the Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Contractors’ National Association and The Surety & Fidelity Association of America.

They also recommended an amendment that would allow contracting officers to continue to make changes in the work within the general scope of the contract, at any time and without notice to sureties, “but only if funds are available to pay the costs of such changes.”

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Jun 29, 2021

Biden China policy may spur more increased U.S. PV manufacturing capacity

Senate bill proposes advanced solar manufacturing production credit.

Codes and Standards | Jun 28, 2021

Local and state building energy performance standards aim to curb climate change

Owners must up the ante on operations and retrofits.

Codes and Standards | Jun 24, 2021

Biden Administration will restore ‘Waters of the U.S.’ protections ended by Trump

Early revision more likely to hold up in court, says legal expert.

Codes and Standards | Jun 23, 2021

Denver unveils renewable heating and cooling plan

City releases roadmap to decarbonizing existing homes and buildings.

Codes and Standards | Jun 22, 2021

Actually, few companies plan to significantly reduce their office footprint

CBRE survey shows that many firms will continue with hybrid work.

Codes and Standards | Jun 21, 2021

Vancouver, B.C., may delay new zero emissions building standards

Building permit delays may postpone new standards by a year.

Codes and Standards | Jun 17, 2021

Buffalo’s parking reform having noticeable impact on development

Elimination of mandatory parking allotments encourages new projects.

Codes and Standards | Jun 16, 2021

Inconsistent building codes make some states more vulnerable to hurricanes

Florida takes top spot for strongest building code in latest IBHS survey.

Codes and Standards | Jun 15, 2021

Growing housing supply gap will worsen affordability crisis

Supply projected to fall 4.5 million units short in 2022.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021