Finding true north is just as essential for project teams and capital projects as it is for personal journeys and accurate navigation. Ask any surveyor. They will tell you that true north by definition is not magnetic North. To find true north from a magnetic compass you have to know the local magnetic variation and how it has varied over time. If you want to get from a point at the bottom of a map to one at the top, you must head true north.
Metaphorically, true north refers to one’s direction in life, as we are often uncertain where we stand, where we are going, and what is the right path for us personally. Knowing our true north enables us to follow the right path.
The same holds true for the life of a healthcare project. Most healthcare projects can take four to five years or more to come to fruition when you account for the time vested in pre- and post-construction. Because healthcare projects take years to implement and given the size of the teams involved, developing a "true north charter" is essential for a healthcare capital project in order to keep the entire team on track and moving in the right direction.
Defining a true north for a capital project takes time and effort, but can yield great benefits and the impact can be transformational. By communicating a shared vision and mission between the client, the project team, and the project, a true north charter can help inspire.
The charter outlines the required conditions of satisfaction that should be strategic, operational, and project specific in nature. The charter should also assign measurable goals to help the team track and assess their achievements through the life of the project. The underlying benefit of defining a true north charter is developing team dynamics built on trust, accountability, transparency, respect, and collaboration.
FINDING BALANCE IN CHOPPY WATERS
Navigating the capital planning and implementation process was much easier when the economy was humming. There was adequate access to funding, and the key driver for planning was volume. However, the healthcare industry has been rapidly evolving under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and a soft economy. Healthcare reform has compelled health systems, hospitals, and physician groups to reduce costs and improve the quality of care-all with more regulatory requirements and less capital.
Changes to reimbursement methods, along with reductions in healthcare provider compensation, are forcing health systems to rethink their approach to balancing their assets and liabilities, including health care real estate. These factors, particularly when combined with a projected increase in demand for ~79 million aging baby boomers and ~30 million newly insured patients, has operators and owners of real estate repositioning portfolio requirements.
SETTING VISION AND MISSION
Finding true north in these choppy waters requires a keen sense of the market and a strong sense of the institution’s purpose. This starts with the mission and vision of the organization. While all health institutions exist to serve the community, the current market has forced many organizations to focus their efforts on meeting the greatest needs and offers specialization only when the market can support it financially.
A comprehensive strategic plan should highlight the organization’s vision, mission, and key areas of focus and be the baseline navigational tool for the institution and any capital spending. The true north for a capital project is then guided by the organization’s vision and mission statements, and further developed into a tangible project mission statement, guiding principles, target metrics, and target future state operations.
One Midwest health system’s vision and mission states:
“Our mission is to improve the health of the communities we serve through quality health care, education and research. Our vision is to be the best for those who need us. We value safety, compassion, respect and integrity.”
A sample of a project mission statement that could accompany such a corporate mission statement could be: “Through collaboration, team integration, and best practices, the project team endeavors to provide the expanded and improved facility within the owner’s schedule, efficiency, and budget goals while providing high levels of quality, safety, and team satisfaction. By delivering the XYZ Health System New Tower Project, the project team will meet the expectations set by the Health System board, administration, caregivers, support staff, and community through our innovation, collaboration, and professionalism."
STAYING ON TRACK
While the preceding project mission statement provides a framework for positive motivation and influence, it does not deliver the tangible metrics needed to offer feedback to the project team or client to know if the project is on the right path or that the desired outcomes have been achieved. In order to provide continuous feedback and help steer towards the projects "true north," goals must be tangible and measurable.
Guiding principles or goals should address the organization’s strategic and operational goals of the project, as well as the project-specific goals that address team performance. Each specific goal can then be supported by a tactic that can be mapped, tested, and monitored through specific key performance indicators, or KPIs. Prior to construction, KPIs for each tactic should be captured to establish baseline data in order for progress reports and post-occupancy data to be available for feedback and for comparison to future state.
Example strategic goal areas
- Increase Market Share
- Accommodate Private Bed Model
- Invest in New Model of Care
- Invest in Infrastructure to Decrease Operational Costs
Example Operational Goal Areas
- Maximize Staff Efficiency
- Improve Occupancy Efficiency by 15% (throughput)
- Reduce Cycle Times by 10%
- Reduce Medical Errors
- Increase Patient Satisfaction Scores
- Increase Flexibility of the Space
Example Project Goal Areas
- Safety During Construction
- Schedule Adherence
- Quality Product
- Cost Control
- Community Relationships
- Communication and Commitments
- Team Behavior and Relationships
ACHIEVING TRUE NORTH
Perhaps the greatest benefit to setting a capital project’s true north is the ability to provide feedback. It helps build trust for the project team, creates accountability, provides transparency, affords respect, and encourages collaboration for the entire team. Two reporting tools used to inform leadership and project teams on the success in navigating toward true north are the project status report (PSR) and the after action review (AAR).
The PSR, as its name suggests, provides an overview of your project’s trajectory. More than a reporting mechanism, the PSR should be a management tool that aides the team in achieving the established KPIs.
While many KPIs are tangible and measurable, others related to team dynamics and communication which may only be measured through a survey.
Still, other outcomes can only be measured post-occupancy. The AAR is a structured debrief process and knowledge management tool that provides accountability and insight. Perhaps the greatest benefit of the AAR is the lessons learned that can be applied to future work, teams, and processes. The AAR is developed by the entire project team after project completion. It captures true-north desired outcomes, measurable goals, tactics, and pre-construction metrics in order to summarize the capital project’s process, work products and post construction results.
CONCLUSION
Regardless of the terminology used, be sure to invest time in identifying the direction and process that will deliver the desired results for your project. By following the old adage of “plan your work and work your plan,” your project team will set the foundation to follow true north and ultimately achieve success. And in the process, you will find the underlying benefit of continual improvement.
About the Authors
Steve Higgs is Managing Director and Lora Schwartz is Principal Consultant with CBRE Healthcare.
Related Stories
| Jul 16, 2013
As the U.S. economy sputters back to life, contractors wait for the green light on projects [2013 Giants 300 Report]
There are enough positive indictors in the economy to justify greenlighting projects, but building owners and developers remain reluctant to pull the trigger.
| Jul 16, 2013
Robotics: A new way to demolish buildings
A robot prototype uses water jets to break up concrete structures and then sucks up the water and debris for reuse and recycling.
| Jul 15, 2013
Mergers and acquisitions transform engineering sector [2013 Giants 300 Report]
Merger and acquisition deals by MEP, commissioning, structural, and specialty engineering firms were up 14% nationwide in 2012 compared with 2011.
| Jul 15, 2013
Top Engineering/Architecture Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]
Jacobs, AECOM, Parsons Brinckerhoff top Building Design+Construction's 2013 ranking of the largest engineering/architecture firms in the United States.
| Jul 15, 2013
Top Architecture/Engineering Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]
Stantec, HOK, HDR top Building Design+Construction's 2013 ranking of the largest architecture/engineering firms in the United States.
| Jul 15, 2013
Top Architecture Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]
Gensler, Perkins+Will, NBBJ top Building Design+Construction's 2013 ranking of the largest architecture firms in the United States.
| Jul 15, 2013
Zaha Hadid unveils plan for boutique condo development in New York
Related Companies taps the London-based architect for the 11-story 520 West 28th Street residential development adjacent to the High Line in Chelsea.
| Jul 12, 2013
12 award-winning healthcare projects [slideshow]
AIA's Academy of Architecture for Health announced the recipients of the 2013 AIA National Healthcare Design Awards.
| Jul 11, 2013
Bill to borrow more for college spending in Michigan criticized due to ‘higher-ed bubble’
An amendment to a Michigan appropriations budget authorizes an increase in state debt to pay for state university construction projects. But some experts see a “higher education bubble” on the horizon, and said more taxpayer debt for more buildings is a bad idea.