Global supply-chain delays and shortages have had an impact on construction contracts in terms of enforceability and risk, and have increased the likelihood of litigation to settle differences between parties, as well as the need to negotiate contracts that anticipate and minimize potential disputes.
“The allocation of risk is paramount to [achieving] the best possible outcome,” stated David Vanderhider, a Partner in the San Antonio office of Dykema Gossett, a Detroit-based national law firm with a substantial construction litigation practice.
During an October 26 webinar that explored the legal considerations of supply-chain impacts on contracts, Vanderhider was joined by two Partners from Dykema Gossett’s Chicago office: Steven Mroczkowski, who is Co-leader of the firm’s Construction Group; and Melanie Chico, Asset Practice Group Leader.
Chico predicted that supply-chain problems, including those related to costs and labor, are likely to spill into 2023. To which Vanderhider followed that earlier attention to planning will be needed to prepare for delays and cost overruns. Mroczkowksi added that collaboration is the key to allocating risk fairly, and he’s been seeing fewer take-it-or-leave-it clauses on contracts. But he also noted that “there’s no one-size-fits-all” solution.
Contractual risk and reward
The bulk of the webinar was taken up with the partners discussing different contract clauses. For example, Mroczkowski has seen an uptick in litigation over the applicability of force majeure, which is intended to excuse nonperformance following a particular event. (This is commonly known as the “Act of God” provision.) Such clauses are enforceable when the event is beyond the reasonable control of the party. And what is often being litigated, he said, is whether the affected party took sufficient steps to reduce its risk.
Mroczkowski cautioned that force majeure can vary by jurisdiction and how a project’s financing is structured, which is why he advises clients to customize the language of their contracts to the realities of the given project. “Sometimes, risk allocation boils down to an amendment in a contract,” observed Chico.
Another growing area of dispute, the partners said, is a contract’s Notice requirement, which spells out when a party is entitled to additional compensation or time. Chico said that too many notice clauses are loosely drawn up, and lack specificity when it comes to who, what, when, and why.
Indeed, the partners agreed that the precision of a particular clause’s language usually determines each party’s level of protection in a contract, especially at a time when outside forces that affect contractual agreements are in flux.
Litigate or arbitrate
During the webinar, the partners touched on suspension and termination provisions, limitation of liability clauses, waivers for consequential damages (which owners are generally interested in), safety requirements, and insurance requirements. (Vanderhider said that insurance policies covering errors and omissions/professional liability “are trending,” and revolve around notice provisions.)
He said he’s been seeing contracts with more provisions that allow owners to withhold payments, with a notorious change in emphasis from “pay when paid” to “pay if paid,” which shifts more risk onto subcontractors. Chico added there are options “to be creative here,” such as payment clauses that kick in or are capped at certain thresholds, are limited to certain building materials, are tied to index pricing, or offer early payment for supply and storage actions.
The partners also took some time to debate how best to resolve disputes in general.
Vanderhider typically favors litigation, claiming that arbitration doesn’t always save time or money, and can place limits on the presentation of evidence and witnesses. “Many of the more common contract forms don’t reflect the reality of today’s economic climate,” he asserted. But Vanderhider also conceded that arbitration makes it easier for parties to keep evidence private
Chico, on the other hand, prefers arbitration, “mostly because it’s faster” than letting a lawsuit play out. She and Vanderhider agreed that dispute clauses in contracts are most effective when they are consistent throughout the construction chain. Mroczkowski recommended, too, that contracts include a provision mandating some level of arbitration so as not to halt the project while the parties try to resolve differences.
In conclusion, Mroczkowski cited four takeaways for contractual risk mitigation:
•Focus on your priorities
•Be proactive anticipating supply-chain impacts
•Ensure consistency in certain key contract terms
•Ensure compliance with local laws.
Related Stories
| Sep 22, 2014
Sound selections: 12 great choices for ceilings and acoustical walls
From metal mesh panels to concealed-suspension ceilings, here's our roundup of the latest acoustical ceiling and wall products.
| Sep 19, 2014
Smithsonian Institution opens LEED Platinum lab facility
The Charles McC. Mathias Laboratory will emit 37% less CO2 than a comparable lab that does not meet LEED-certification standards.
| Sep 17, 2014
Atlanta Braves break ground on mixed-use ballpark development
SunTrust Park will be constructed by American Builders 2017, a joint venture between Brasfield & Gorrie, Mortenson Construction, Barton Malow Company, and New South Construction.
Sponsored | | Sep 17, 2014
The balance between innovation and standardization – How DPR Construction achieves both
How does DPR strike a balance between standardization and innovation? In today’s Digital COM video Blog, Sasha Reed interviews Nathan Wood, Innovator with DPR Construction, to learn more about their successful approach to fueling innovation. SPONSORED CONTENT
| Sep 16, 2014
Ranked: Top hotel sector AEC firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]
Tutor Perini, Gensler, and AECOM top BD+C's rankings of design and construction firms with the most revenue from hospitality sector projects, as reported in the 2014 Giants 300 Report.
| Sep 16, 2014
Shigeru Ban’s design wins Tainan Museum of Fine Arts competition
Pritzker Prize-winning architect Shigeru Ban has won an international competition organized by The Tainan Museum of Art in Taiwan. Ban's design features cascading volumes with an auditorium, classrooms, and exhibition galleries.
| Sep 15, 2014
Ranked: Top international AEC firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]
Parsons Brinckerhoff, Gensler, and Jacobs top BD+C's rankings of U.S.-based design and construction firms with the most revenue from international projects, as reported in the 2014 Giants 300 Report.
Sponsored | | Sep 13, 2014
5 common questions leaders should never ask
Asking the right questions can help business leaders to anticipate changes, seize opportunities and move their firms in new directions. SPONSORED CONTENT
| Sep 10, 2014
Ranked: Top transit facility sector AEC firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]
Leo A Daly, URS, and Skanska head BD+C's rankings of the largest transit facility sector design and construction firms, based on the 2014 Giants 300 Report.
| Sep 9, 2014
Ranked: Top religious sector AEC firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]
Brasfield & Gorrie, Gensler, and Jacobs top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest religious sector design and construction firms, as reported in the 2014 Giants 300 Report.