Global supply-chain delays and shortages have had an impact on construction contracts in terms of enforceability and risk, and have increased the likelihood of litigation to settle differences between parties, as well as the need to negotiate contracts that anticipate and minimize potential disputes.
“The allocation of risk is paramount to [achieving] the best possible outcome,” stated David Vanderhider, a Partner in the San Antonio office of Dykema Gossett, a Detroit-based national law firm with a substantial construction litigation practice.
During an October 26 webinar that explored the legal considerations of supply-chain impacts on contracts, Vanderhider was joined by two Partners from Dykema Gossett’s Chicago office: Steven Mroczkowski, who is Co-leader of the firm’s Construction Group; and Melanie Chico, Asset Practice Group Leader.
Chico predicted that supply-chain problems, including those related to costs and labor, are likely to spill into 2023. To which Vanderhider followed that earlier attention to planning will be needed to prepare for delays and cost overruns. Mroczkowksi added that collaboration is the key to allocating risk fairly, and he’s been seeing fewer take-it-or-leave-it clauses on contracts. But he also noted that “there’s no one-size-fits-all” solution.
Contractual risk and reward
The bulk of the webinar was taken up with the partners discussing different contract clauses. For example, Mroczkowski has seen an uptick in litigation over the applicability of force majeure, which is intended to excuse nonperformance following a particular event. (This is commonly known as the “Act of God” provision.) Such clauses are enforceable when the event is beyond the reasonable control of the party. And what is often being litigated, he said, is whether the affected party took sufficient steps to reduce its risk.
Mroczkowski cautioned that force majeure can vary by jurisdiction and how a project’s financing is structured, which is why he advises clients to customize the language of their contracts to the realities of the given project. “Sometimes, risk allocation boils down to an amendment in a contract,” observed Chico.
Another growing area of dispute, the partners said, is a contract’s Notice requirement, which spells out when a party is entitled to additional compensation or time. Chico said that too many notice clauses are loosely drawn up, and lack specificity when it comes to who, what, when, and why.
Indeed, the partners agreed that the precision of a particular clause’s language usually determines each party’s level of protection in a contract, especially at a time when outside forces that affect contractual agreements are in flux.
Litigate or arbitrate
During the webinar, the partners touched on suspension and termination provisions, limitation of liability clauses, waivers for consequential damages (which owners are generally interested in), safety requirements, and insurance requirements. (Vanderhider said that insurance policies covering errors and omissions/professional liability “are trending,” and revolve around notice provisions.)
He said he’s been seeing contracts with more provisions that allow owners to withhold payments, with a notorious change in emphasis from “pay when paid” to “pay if paid,” which shifts more risk onto subcontractors. Chico added there are options “to be creative here,” such as payment clauses that kick in or are capped at certain thresholds, are limited to certain building materials, are tied to index pricing, or offer early payment for supply and storage actions.
The partners also took some time to debate how best to resolve disputes in general.
Vanderhider typically favors litigation, claiming that arbitration doesn’t always save time or money, and can place limits on the presentation of evidence and witnesses. “Many of the more common contract forms don’t reflect the reality of today’s economic climate,” he asserted. But Vanderhider also conceded that arbitration makes it easier for parties to keep evidence private
Chico, on the other hand, prefers arbitration, “mostly because it’s faster” than letting a lawsuit play out. She and Vanderhider agreed that dispute clauses in contracts are most effective when they are consistent throughout the construction chain. Mroczkowski recommended, too, that contracts include a provision mandating some level of arbitration so as not to halt the project while the parties try to resolve differences.
In conclusion, Mroczkowski cited four takeaways for contractual risk mitigation:
•Focus on your priorities
•Be proactive anticipating supply-chain impacts
•Ensure consistency in certain key contract terms
•Ensure compliance with local laws.
Related Stories
Contractors | May 20, 2021
Balfour Beatty’s outreach to veterans pays dividends in leadership and growth
Contracts for work it’s done for the San Diego Unified School District have extended to several disabled vet-owned businesses.
Senior Living Design | May 19, 2021
Senior living design: Post-COVID trends and innovations
Two senior living design experts discuss the latest trends and innovations in the senior living building sector.
Multifamily Housing | May 18, 2021
Multifamily housing sector sees near record proposal activity in early 2021
The multifamily sector led all housing submarkets, and was third among all 58 submarkets tracked by PSMJ in the first quarter of 2021.
Wood | May 14, 2021
What's next for mass timber design?
An architect who has worked on some of the nation's largest and most significant mass timber construction projects shares his thoughts on the latest design trends and innovations in mass timber.
Healthcare Facilities | Apr 30, 2021
Registration and waiting: Weak points and an enduring strength
Changing how patients register and wait for appointments will enhance the healthcare industry’s ability to respond to crises.
University Buildings | Apr 29, 2021
The Weekly Show, April 29, 2021: COVID-19's impact on campus planning, and bird management strategies
This week on The Weekly show, BD+C Senior Editor John Caulfield interviews a duo of industry experts on 1) how campus planning has changed during the pandemic and 2) managing bird infestations on construction sites and completed buildings.
Multifamily Housing | Apr 22, 2021
The Weekly Show, Apr 22, 2021: COVID-19's impact on multifamily amenities
This week on The Weekly show, BD+C's Robert Cassidy speaks with three multifamily design experts about the impact of COVID-19 on apartment and condo amenities, based on the 2021 Multifamily Amenities Survey.
Market Data | Apr 20, 2021
The pandemic moves subs and vendors closer to technology
Consigli’s latest market outlook identifies building products that are high risk for future price increases.