flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

How and why AEC professionals choose flooring systems

How and why AEC professionals choose flooring systems

Design and construction professionals who completed our flooring survey had strong opinions about their preferred flooring type. 


By By BD+C Staff | August 19, 2011
This article first appeared in the August 2011 issue of BD+C.

Design and construction professionals who completed our flooring survey had strong opinions about their preferred flooring type. Typical responses: “Hardwood and porcelain tile are my favorites.” “I prefer carpet.” “I love polished concrete. Price, durability, ease of maintenance—need I say more?” “We have started using recycled rubber flooring and it has been a great success.” “My favorite would be integral color concrete, with options of staining, etching, and sealers or paste wax.”

“We are really sold on carpet tiles,” one respondent enthused. “Eighty percent of the wear is found on 20% of the carpet. I like replacing just 20% every 10 years.” Another respondent said, “Engineered wood looks like the real thing and performs resiliently to all scratches.” This respondent’s faves? Slate and wood: “Aesthetic, cool, and environmentally friendly.” Another’s “three best innovations”: “affordable, high-performance thin-set terrazzo, recyclable carpet, and bamboo.”

Respondents reported a problem with recent disruptions to the supply chain. “The biggest issue is getting the specified products in a timely manner, especially if they are made overseas,” said one. Another cited “availability and transportation costs.”

Maintenance issues also came up. “Many clients do not know how to maintain their floors well at minimal costs,” wrote one respondent. “On the other hand, manufacturers often present maintenance scenarios that are unreal.”

A number of respondents offered practical advice to others in the field. “Installers are a significant part of the equation,” warned one. “Always check your flooring moisture content prior to setting flooring materials,” advised one. Another piece of advice: “Always note the coefficient of friction.” Said another, “Thorough research has always preceded our flooring choices.”

WATER-BASED ADHESIVES AND CONCRETE

Several respondents wrote about the use of water-based adhesives on concrete slabs. “Although they are more eco-friendly with low VOCs, they require the concrete slab to be much drier than can typically be achieved,” said one. “This has prompted a slew of products to seal the concrete before installing the floor covering. Some of these products work and others do not. The manufacturers’ claims are typically not true and there is no standard to compare them.” This writer added that “newer adhesives have come out that can accommodate higher moisture and pH levels in the concrete. I welcome this trend as it greatly simplifies the process and creates less liability for everyone.”

Another got down and dirty on the topic of adhesion of floor coverings when vapor emissions, pH, or relative humidity values of new concrete floor slabs exceed the ranges allowed by the flooring manufacturer for a warrantable installation: “Using a reputable vapor emission control system (and our research has found that there are only a couple of systems that perform as advertised on a consistent basis) definitely helps reduce flooring failures.”

Summing up this moisture/adhesives issues, one AEC professional said, “The flooring industry must develop unified and clearly spelled-out national standards to test and accept relative humidity values. It is a mess right now. It must be thoroughly studied [and] researched, and national guidelines [must] be published.”  BD+C

 

Major Findings of the Flooring Study

1. Ceramic tile was the runaway choice for flooring systems, with 80% of respondents using it in the past 18-24 months.

2. Other strong preferences: broadloom carpet (66%), carpet tile (65%), and VCT–vinyl composition tile and concrete/polished concrete (both 58%).

3. The four most important general factors in choosing flooring systems were initial cost, including installation (69%); durability/reliability (66%); performance/quality (61%;) and aesthetics (59%).

4. In terms of sustainability, life cycle cost/life cycle assessment (60%) and low to no VOC content (59%) finished in a virtual dead heat. Tying for third (given the 6% margin of error): LEED points or other green certification (39%) and recycled content (38%).

5. No certification program, rating system, or industry standard gained a majority of respondents. FSC certification (from the Forest Stewardship Council) for wood flooring came out on top (44%).

6. Nearly three in 10 respondents (29%) said they had no problems in choosing flooring products. Others cited such concerns as reliability of product data (31%), conflicting manufacturer claims and not enough time to research/choose products (both 29%), and false or unsubstantiated claims (28%).

 

METHODOLOGY

Building Design+Construction surveyed a representative sample of its subscribers via e-mail in late July 2011. An incentive of a $25 Amazon gift certificate was offered to the first 10 respondents; 258 qualified surveys were returned. The approximate margin of error: 6% at the 95% confidence level.

 

Table 1.

Which of the following flooring systems have you (or your firm) used in the past 18-24 months?

Ceramic tile  80%           

Linoleum/linoleum-type flooring  36%

Broadloom carpet  66%           

Laminate  33%

Carpet tile  65%           

Rubber  32%

Concrete/polished concrete  58%           

Composite wood  29%

Vinyl composite tile  58%           

Bamboo  26%

Porcelain tile  55%           

Terrazzo  26%

Hardwood  51%           

Luxury vinyl tile  17%

Marble/stone  40%           

Solid vinyl tile  17%

Vinyl sheet  37%           

Cork  1%

N = 250 | Note: Respondents could make multiple selections.

The majority of our flooring survey respondents use ceramic tile, broadloom carpet, and carpet tile. Cork received only 22 (or just under 1%) of the 250 responses.

 

Table 2.

Based upon your experience and that of your clients, which of the following general factors do you find most important in choosing a flooring system?

Cost (initial cost, including installation)  69%

Durability/reliability  66%

Performance/quality  61%

Aesthetics  59%

Ease/cost of maintenance  37%

Acoustics/noise control  15%

Ease of installation  14%

Warranty  11%

Manufacturer’s reputation  10%

Recommendation from colleague or professional  4%

Recommendation from flooring contractor  3%

Recommendation from manufacturer’s technical representative  2%

Third-party rating or certification  2%

N = 252 | Note: Respondents could make multiple selections.

Cost ranked highest, with durability/reliability, performance/quality, and aesthetics following closely behind. Recommendations either from colleagues or professionals, flooring contractors, and a manufacturer’s technical representative garnered the least votes, along with third-party rating or certification.

 

Table 3.

From your experience and that of your clients, which of the following “green” or sustainability factors do you consider most important in choosing a flooring system?

Life cycle cost/life cycle assessment  60%

Low to no VOC content  59%

LEED points or other green certification  39%

Recycled content  38%

Local sourcing  32%

Recycleability at end of useful life  23%

No PVC  11%

Reduced packaging  7%

Biomimicry of flooring product  5%

N = 245 | Note: Respondents could make multiple selections.

Life cycle cost/life cycle assessment and low to no VOC content ranked highest, followed by LEED points or other green certification and recycled content. A reduction of packaging and biomimicry of flooring products received the fewest responses.

 

Table 4.

Which of the following certification programs, rating systems, or industry standards have you (or your firm)
used in evaluating, specifying, or using flooring products?

Forest Stewardship Council  44%

Greenguard  34%

Green Label/Green Label Plus  31%

Green Seal  28%

Green Spec Directory  23%

NSF-332 Resilient Floor Coverings Standard  22%

Ecologic  18%

FloorScore  18%

NSF-140 Sustainable Carpet Assessment Standard  16%

C2C Cradle to Cradle  15%

Sustainable Forestry Initiative  14%

Sustainable Choice  10%

Canadian Standards Association  6%

Indoor Advantage/Indoor Advantage Gold  6%

Pharos  3%

N = 202 | Note: Respondents could make multiple selections.

The Forest Stewardship Council, Greenguard, and Green Label/Green Label Plus were the top three certification programs, rating systems, or industry standards recognized by respondents when evaluating, specifying, or using floor products. The top three were followed closely by Green Seal and Green Spec Directory. Pharos only garnered 3% of the 202 total responses.

 

Table 5.

From your experience, what are the three biggest problems you face (or have faced) in choosing flooring products?

Reliability of product data  31%

Conflicting manufacturer claims  29%

Not enough time to research/choose products  29%

No problems in choosing flooring products  29%

False or unsubstantiated claims  28%

Not enough product data  22%

Too many product choices  15%

Product data not technical enough  13%

Product data too technical/too hard to understand  9%

Not enough product choices  8%

Too much product data  2%

N = 245 | Note: Respondents could make multiple selections.

Reliability of product data represented 31% of the responses, followed by conflicting manufacturer claims, not enough time to research/choose products, no problems in choosing flooring products at 29%, and false or unsubstantiated claims (28%). Only 2% of respondents selected too much product data as one of the biggest problems faced in choosing flooring products.

Related Stories

| Mar 16, 2011

Foster + Partners to design carbon-neutral urban park for West Kowloon Cultural District in Hong Kong

Foster + Partners has been selected by the board of the West Kowloon Cultural District Authority to design a massive 56-acre urban park on a reclaimed harbor-front site in Hong Kong. Designed as a carbon-neutral development, “City Park”  will seamlessly blend into existing streets while creating large expanses of green space and seventeen new cultural venues.

| Mar 15, 2011

What Starbucks taught us about redesigning college campuses

Equating education with a cup of coffee might seem like a stretch, but your choice of college, much like your choice of coffee, says something about the ability of a brand to transform your day. When Perkins + Will was offered the chance to help re-think the learning spaces of Miami Dade College, we started by thinking about how our choice of morning coffee has changed over the years, and how we could apply those lessons to education.

| Mar 15, 2011

What will the architecture profession look like in 2025?

The global economy and the economic recession have greatly affected architecture firms' business practices. A Building Futures survey from the Royal Institute of British Architects looks at how these factors will have transformed the profession and offers a glimpse of future trends. Among the survey's suggestions: not only will architecture firms have to focus on a financial and business approach rather than predominantly design-led offices, but also company names are predicted to drop ‘architect’ altogether.

| Mar 15, 2011

Passive Strategies for Building Healthy Schools, An AIA/CES Discovery Course

With the downturn in the economy and the crash in residential property values, school districts across the country that depend primarily on property tax revenue are struggling to make ends meet, while fulfilling the demand for classrooms and other facilities.

| Mar 14, 2011

Renowned sustainable architect Charles D. Knight to lead Cannon Design’s Phoenix office

Cannon Design is pleased to announce that Charles D. Knight, AIA, CID, LEED AP, has joined the firm as principal. Knight will serve as the leader of the Phoenix office with a focus on advancing the firm’s healthcare practice. Knight brings over 25 years of experience and is an internationally recognized architect who has won numerous awards for his unique contributions to the sustainable and humanistic design of healthcare facilities.

| Mar 11, 2011

University of Oregon scores with new $227 million basketball arena

The University of Oregon’s Matthew Knight Arena opened January 13 with a men’s basketball game against USC where the Ducks beat the Trojans, 68-62. The $227 million arena, which replaces the school’s 84-year-old McArthur Court, has a seating bowl pitched at 36 degrees to replicate the close-to-the-action feel of the smaller arena it replaced, although this new one accommodates 12,364 fans.

| Mar 11, 2011

Temporary modular building at Harvard targets sustainability

Anderson Anderson Architecture of San Francisco designed the Harvard Yard childcare facility, a modular building manufactured by Triumph Modular of Littleton, Mass., that was installed at Harvard University. The 5,700-sf facility will remain on the university’s Cambridge, Mass., campus for 18 months while the Harvard Yard Child Care Center and the Oxford Street Daycare Coop are being renovated.

| Mar 11, 2011

Holiday Inn reworked for Downtown Disney Resort

The Orlando, Fla., office of VOA Associates completed a comprehensive interior and exterior renovation of the 14-story Holiday Inn in the Downtown Disney Resort in Lake Buena Vista, Fla. The $25 million project involved rehabbing the hotel’s 332 guest rooms, atrium, swimming pool, restaurant, fitness center, and administrative spaces.

| Mar 11, 2011

Renovation energizes retirement community in Massachusetts

The 12-year-old Edgewood Retirement Community in Andover, Mass., underwent a major 40,000-sf expansion and renovation that added 60 patient care beds in the long-term care unit, a new 17,000-sf, 40-bed cognitive impairment unit, and an 80-seat informal dining bistro.

| Mar 11, 2011

Research facility added to Texas Medical Center

Situated on the Texas Medical Center’s North Campus in Houston, the new Methodist Hospital Research Institute is a 12-story, 440,000-sf facility dedicated to translational research. Designed by New York City-based Kohn Pedersen Fox, with healthcare, science, and technology firm WHR Architects, Houston, the building has open, flexible labs, offices, and amenities for use by 90 principal investigators and 800 post-doc trainees and staff.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category

Construction Costs

Data center construction costs for 2024

Gordian’s data features more than 100 building models, including computer data centers. These localized models allow architects, engineers, and other preconstruction professionals to quickly and accurately create conceptual estimates for future builds. This table shows a five-year view of costs per square foot for one-story computer data centers. 


Sustainability

Grimshaw launches free online tool to help accelerate decarbonization of buildings

Minoro, an online platform to help accelerate the decarbonization of buildings, was recently launched by architecture firm Grimshaw, in collaboration with more than 20 supporting organizations including World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), RIBA, Architecture 2030, the World Green Building Council (WorldGBC) and several national Green Building Councils from across the globe.



Healthcare Facilities

Watch on-demand: Key Trends in the Healthcare Facilities Market for 2024-2025

Join the Building Design+Construction editorial team for this on-demand webinar on key trends, innovations, and opportunities in the $65 billion U.S. healthcare buildings market. A panel of healthcare design and construction experts present their latest projects, trends, innovations, opportunities, and data/research on key healthcare facilities sub-sectors. A 2024-2025 U.S. healthcare facilities market outlook is also presented.

halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021