, , ,, and other social networking sites are changing the way AEC professionals and their firms promote themselves, recruit employees, and advertise their services. However, as Building Design+Construction’s survey on social networking reveals, professionals in the AEC industry are still curious—and cautiously optimistic—about working social media into their everyday work.
Here’s what a representative sample of your peers told us about their use of social media.
NETWORKING AND COMMUNICATING
Findings: More than half of respondents (53%) use social media for personal but not professional purposes, while 48% say they do use it for networking and communicating with others in their field. When it comes to marketing and publicity, however, only 28% say they turn to social media channels.
Opinions: On personal vs. professional use, opinions were black and white: Respondents either found real value in social media as a business tool or they didn’t—there was very little gray area.
On the positive side: “If you aren’t using social media you are behind. It’s where your clients are and you should be there too,” wrote one. “Connecting with people worldwide is definitely beneficial and is changing the face of my business,” and “It’s critical to my business this year and in the future,” commented others. “I think it’s great—it’s a business tool with a personal touch,” noted one respondent, while another said, “Social media tools are a great complement to business networking.”
Opinions on the other side were more blunt: “Total waste of time and energy,” wrote more than one. “More distracting than informative,” “irrelevant,” noted others. “I don’t think the AEC industry has figured out how to use social media for business purposes yet,” added another.
As for marketing to the AEC community via social media channels, the survey found that effective avenues are still being sorted out. One respondent wrote, “The AEC industry has such a long sales cycle—many times measured in years—that social media may not impact marketing and sales the way it purports to with consumer markets. There aren’t a lot of emotional purchases made in the AEC industry.” Another offered, “I have not yet found the right method for using social media for marketing.” On the positive side, one respondent stated, “I believe it’s a necessary and useful tool for marketing your business now.”
LINKEDIN VS. FACEBOOK
Findings: LinkedIn (58%) and Facebook (54%) were overwhelming favorites, according to our respondents. YouTube was a distant third (23%), while another 23% said they don’t use social media channels at all. When it comes to blogs, more than three-fourths (76%) said blogs don’t factor into their businesses.
Opinions: LinkedIn was viewed as a more business-oriented site attracting a more professional crowd. “LinkedIn is a good way to know more about someone than just what’s on their business card,” wrote one respondent. Another said, “LinkedIn is wonderful for new connections, but Facebook is too personal.” While Facebook did rank high in the survey, many echoed this respondent’s evaluation: “I think that Facebook is geared for personal and recreational use and not useful in business. Why would I waste time being a Facebook friend of a manufacturer? It seems irrelevant to me.”
As for blogs, the biggest problem respondents said they have is finding quality information. “Blogs can be useful, but are not always a reliable source,” wrote one respondent. Another called blogs “hit or miss.” One respondent pulled no punches: “Reading blogs and other ‘discussion’ panels leaves me thinking that many of the participants are close to illiterate.”
MOST AEC PROFESSIONALS ARE CASUAL USERS
Findings: For those who do use social media sites, their visits are infrequent, with only 20% saying they visit on a daily basis, and 19% visiting a few times a week. Another 32% say they rarely or never visit the various sites.
When AEC professionals do visit, it isn’t for very long. Almost half (47%) spend just a few minutes on a site. Another 18% say they spend 30 minutes or so, while only 6% say they spend more than an hour on the site during each visit.
Another reason AEC professionals don’t visit social media site: they can’t. A significant 61% of respondents report that their firms do not utilize social media channels.
Opinions: Several respondents reported that their employers went so far as to block access to all social media sites—even for legitimate business purposes. Some respondents also said their firms have problems navigating the professional/personal line on social sites. “It is very difficult to separate the firm’s ‘official message’ from those of select employees. This seems to be a problem on both Linkedin and Facebook,” wrote one concerned respondent.
Findings: Business and career networking (60%), checking in on what others in their field are doing (57%), and researching design and construction ideas and trends (49%) were the main reasons AEC professionals use social media. Others said they check in for product information (33%), industry trends (33%), and business and career advice and information (33%).
Those who use social media say results are still hit or miss, with 39% of respondents stating they had had no significant results from these channels. For those reporting successes, 42% said they’ve been able to keep in touch with other professionals, 33% have made a business contact, and 27% have found a useful service, resource, or supplier.
Opinions: “Social media allows me access to a large group of peers over a broad geographic area, and to stay connected to others in the industry,” wrote one social network user. “Social media has provided a great way to contact and network with people. However, it has yet to provide any real conversion to actual clients or dollars,” noted another. “LinkedIn has provided me with several opportunities that, as of now have been unfulfilled, but nevertheless weren’t available before,” said one respondent.
Other respondents were more borderline. “Social networking is a CHEAP way to get your company out there—but you may waste a lot of time interacting without any results to the business,” said one emphatic respondent. Those who found success with social media like it because, as one said, “You’re asking actual people, and that can get you a quick response about the pros and cons of a specific product or service.” Another added, “It makes it easier to find new, useful products now than in the past.”
RELYING ON TRIED-AND-TRUE RESOURCES
Findings: Respondents said they still turn to more traditional or established avenues rather than social media when seeking business or technical information. Professional publications (76%), manufacturer websites (74%), conversations with peers (63%), and advertising in professional publications (57%) were the top outlets for obtaining information.
Opinions: “Going to a given company’s website is more fruitful,” noted one respondent. Another favored a mix of old and new media: “I think [social media channels] are very useful, but I just can’t use them exclusively.” Added another respondent, “I observe Facebook and find it more distracting than informative. For now, in the interest of keeping up with my workload, I’m sticking with the most efficient, effective media.”
SURVEY METHODOLOGY
The survey was emailed to a representative sample of BD+C’s subscriber list. Eligibility to enter a drawing for a $25 Amazon.com gift certificate was offered as an incentive, and 370 qualified returns were obtained. A margin of error of 4% at the 95% confidence level can be expected. The majority of responses (43%) came from architects and designers; however, respondents were spread across the professions, and include 21% from engineers and 20% from contractors and construction professionals.
Follow us on Twitter @writerschneider and @buildingteam360
Friend us on Facebook: www.facebook.com/BDCnetwork
Join our Building Design+Construction group on LinkedIn
Related Stories
| Jan 31, 2012
Perkins Eastman’s Miller appointed Chairman of the AIA International Committee
International expertise leveraged as global industry resource.
| Jan 31, 2012
KBE selected for school project in Waterbury, Conn.
Located adjacent to the existing elementary school, the $28 million, 82,000 s/f Pre-K to eighth Grade school is expected to host its first students in the fall of 2013.
| Jan 31, 2012
Construction Law Firm Allensworth & Porter, LLP adds May to the firm
Prior to joining Allensworth & Porter, May served as the staff attorney for the Texas Civil Justice League, and was responsible for drafting, analyzing, and tracking civil justice and business-related legislation during the 82nd Legislative Session.
| Jan 31, 2012
Skanska USA Civil promotes Bradley to southeast general superintendent
In Bradley’s new position, he will manage field operations for all Skanska Civil projects in the southeast.
| Jan 30, 2012
Siemens and Air-Ex Team deliver building controls training to Mt. San Antonio College students
Siemens contributes training modules and technology to support hands-on courses.
| Jan 30, 2012
Hollister Construction Services to renovate 30 Montgomery Street in Jersey City, N.J.
Owner Onyx Equities hires firm to oversee comprehensive upgrades of office building.
| Jan 27, 2012
Caterpillar reports record sales and profit for 4Q and full-year 2011
Momentum carries into 2012 with sales and revenues outlook raised to $68 to $72 billion.
| Jan 27, 2012
Smith Seckman Reid opens two new offices
Smith Seckman Reid, Inc. (SSR), an engineering design and facility consulting firm, has opened two new offices, one in Chicago, the other in Washington, D.C.
| Jan 27, 2012
BRB Architects designs new campus center for Molloy College
Intended to be the centerpiece of the College’s transformation from a commuter college to a 24-hour learning community, the “Public Square” will support student life with spaces such as a café, lounges, study rooms, student club space, a bookstore and an art gallery.
| Jan 27, 2012
Columbia University’s New Core Laboratory aims for LEED Silver
Construction manager Sordoni Construction Co. along with the design team of Payette Architects and Vanderweil Engineers will provide design and construction services to renovate the majority of the existing Core Lab building to create the new Lamont Center for Bio-Geochemistry.