flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

House Appropriations Committee approves $3 billion cut for military construction

House Appropriations Committee approves $3 billion cut for military construction

The Army would see the sharpest cuts on a percentage basis, with a $578 million, or 52% reduction in FY 2015.


By BD+C Staff | April 30, 2014
Photo: US Army via Wikimedia Commons
Photo: US Army via Wikimedia Commons

The Appropriations Committee of the U.S. House of Representative voted to cut about $3 billion from the military construction budget for FY 2015 when compared to FY 2014 funding levels.

The Army would see the sharpest cuts on a percentage basis, with a $578 million, or 52% reduction in FY 2015. However, a provision in the bill provides the Army, Army National Guard, and Army Reserve Accounts an additional $245 million for use and disbursement at the discretion of the Secretary of the Army.

The Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) program, encompassed in the Navy and Marine account, would see a $631 million, or 39%, cut in FY 2015.

The Veteran’s Administration, also impacted by this budget proposal, would be funded at the same level as in FY 2014 ($1.057 billion). The funds for FY 2015 would be evenly split between the two primary VA construction accounts.

The VA’s Major Construction Account—for projects over $10 million—would increase from $342 million in FY 2014 to $561 million in FY 2015. The Minor Construction Account—for projects below $10 million—would decrease from $714 million to $495 million.

The House bill figures are identical to the president’s FY 2015 budget request.

(http://news.agc.org/2014/04/25/house-panel-approves-fy-2015-milconva-funding/)

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Dec 18, 2017

Schools with optimal indoor environments boost student performance and energy efficiency

World Green Building Council report confirms that lighting, indoor air quality, thermal comfort and acoustics impact learning.

Codes and Standards | Dec 14, 2017

Mayors sign Chicago Climate Charter; will strive to meet Paris accord goals

Pledge to push for more local authority to reduce emissions.

Codes and Standards | Dec 13, 2017

New report examines ongoing costs of green infrastructure options

The report compares solutions to reduce stormwater.

Codes and Standards | Dec 12, 2017

Total cost of structural fires in U.S. reached $328.5 billion in 2014

Costs associated with losses was $55.4 billion.

Codes and Standards | Dec 11, 2017

Steel-timber composite system proposed for mid- and high-rise buildings

Structural steel columns and beams support a cross-laminated timber floor system.

Codes and Standards | Dec 7, 2017

Many coastal states performing poorly to protect beaches, coastlines

The most vulnerable regions fare the worst in new study.

Codes and Standards | Dec 5, 2017

Guide for understanding medical monitoring requirement of OSHA silica standard released

Center for Construction Research and Training gives advice on new regulation.

Codes and Standards | Dec 4, 2017

Trump tax proposal would kill historic tax credits

Developers would lose up to 20% discounts on some redevelopment projects.

Codes and Standards | Nov 30, 2017

Asheville, N.C. rezoning favors pedestrians, could change city’s character

Focus is on layout and look of new buildings rather than use.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category



Resiliency

U.S. is reducing floodplain development in most areas

The perception that the U.S. has not been able to curb development in flood-prone areas is mostly inaccurate, according to new research from climate adaptation experts. A national survey of floodplain development between 2001 and 2019 found that fewer structures were built in floodplains than might be expected if cities were building at random.


halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021