flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

House Appropriations Committee approves $3 billion cut for military construction

House Appropriations Committee approves $3 billion cut for military construction

The Army would see the sharpest cuts on a percentage basis, with a $578 million, or 52% reduction in FY 2015.


By BD+C Staff | April 30, 2014
Photo: US Army via Wikimedia Commons
Photo: US Army via Wikimedia Commons

The Appropriations Committee of the U.S. House of Representative voted to cut about $3 billion from the military construction budget for FY 2015 when compared to FY 2014 funding levels.

The Army would see the sharpest cuts on a percentage basis, with a $578 million, or 52% reduction in FY 2015. However, a provision in the bill provides the Army, Army National Guard, and Army Reserve Accounts an additional $245 million for use and disbursement at the discretion of the Secretary of the Army.

The Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) program, encompassed in the Navy and Marine account, would see a $631 million, or 39%, cut in FY 2015.

The Veteran’s Administration, also impacted by this budget proposal, would be funded at the same level as in FY 2014 ($1.057 billion). The funds for FY 2015 would be evenly split between the two primary VA construction accounts.

The VA’s Major Construction Account—for projects over $10 million—would increase from $342 million in FY 2014 to $561 million in FY 2015. The Minor Construction Account—for projects below $10 million—would decrease from $714 million to $495 million.

The House bill figures are identical to the president’s FY 2015 budget request.

(http://news.agc.org/2014/04/25/house-panel-approves-fy-2015-milconva-funding/)

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Mar 19, 2019

Plan for transformation of Lower Manhattan streetscapes unveiled

Pedestrian-friendly “Slow Streets” pilot starts on Earth Day 2019.

Codes and Standards | Mar 15, 2019

Newly developed building materials could have big impact on sustainability

Transparent wood, self-cooling walls, bricks that filter air pollutants among the technological breakthroughs.

Codes and Standards | Mar 14, 2019

U.S. and Canada differ on how to evaluate field performance of windows, curtain walls

Variations include laboratory test method for determining rate of air leakage.

Codes and Standards | Mar 13, 2019

Climate change can’t be stabilized without addressing urban sprawl

Even if power goes green, transportation will still be a major emissions source.

Codes and Standards | Mar 12, 2019

Virginia county hones new rainwater harvesting standard

Developer prompts new rules to use rainwater for heating and air conditioning.

Codes and Standards | Mar 8, 2019

Portland delays requirement for posted warnings on unreinforced brick and stone buildings

Regulation would mandate signs warning that buildings could be unsafe during earthquakes.

Codes and Standards | Mar 7, 2019

California will allow flame retardant-free building insulation

State also repeals business furniture flammability standard.

Codes and Standards | Mar 5, 2019

Persistent flooding having economic impact on coastal cities

Atlantic City, Annapolis among communities affected.

Codes and Standards | Mar 1, 2019

$1 billion Boston hospital project to include extensive disaster resiliency features

Mass. General expansion will be designed for four days of shelter in place.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category



Resiliency

U.S. is reducing floodplain development in most areas

The perception that the U.S. has not been able to curb development in flood-prone areas is mostly inaccurate, according to new research from climate adaptation experts. A national survey of floodplain development between 2001 and 2019 found that fewer structures were built in floodplains than might be expected if cities were building at random.


halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021