flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

GSA adopts SITES land development and management rating system

Codes and Standards

GSA adopts SITES land development and management rating system

Federal agency will use for properties with and without buildings.


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | April 25, 2016
GSA adopts SITES land development and management rating system

Built on a industrial brownfield, the Perot Museum of Nature and Science in Dallas is a SITES project. Photo: Joe Mabel/Wikimedia Commons.

The U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) has adopted the SITES rating system for its capital construction program. 

Green Business Certification Inc.’s SITES is a program for sustainable land development and management and is used by landscape architects, engineers, architects, developers, and policymakers to align land development with innovative sustainable design. SITES certification is for development projects located on sites with or without buildings including national parks, corporate campuses, streetscapes, homes, and more.

GSA is one of the largest and most diversified public real estate organizations in the world with a portfolio of 376.9 million rentable square feet in 8,721 active assets, and more than 144,000 acres of land, including ports of entry and historical properties. The GSA determined that incorporating SITES into the program offers a highly effective and efficient way to ensure environmental performance to meet federal goals on various capital project types.

The rating system provides a metrics-based approach to important concepts like ecosystem services and green infrastructure. The GSA’s decision is incorporated in the 2016 version of Facilities Standards for the Public Buildings Service (P-100), which establishes design standards and criteria for new buildings, infrastructural projects, major and minor alternations, and work in historic structures for the Public Buildings Service (PBS) of the GSA. This document contains both policy and technical criteria used in the programming, design, and documentation of GSA buildings and facilities.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Jan 10, 2022

New ratings services focus on climate risk for homeowners

Efficacy of models used in risk assessment varies.

Codes and Standards | Jan 6, 2022

Virginia contractors having a tough time finding diverse subs to meet state goals

Survey of primes may indicate similar issues at federal level.

Codes and Standards | Jan 5, 2022

Boston drops parking requirements for affordable housing

Measure expected to spur new projects.

Codes and Standards | Jan 4, 2022

Dept. of Energy Better Climate Challenge aims for 50% GHG emission reduction by 2030

Program offers technical assistance and peer-to-peer knowledge sharing.

Codes and Standards | Jan 4, 2022

Architects at New York firm take steps to unionize

Support for unionization reported at two other New York firms.

Codes and Standards | Jan 3, 2022

Biden’s executive order for a carbon-neutral government includes green materials mandate

As a driver of demand, federal procurement impact could ripple through the economy.

Codes and Standards | Jan 3, 2022

Controversial California solar power incentive proposal would reduce subsidies

Plan intended to encourage customers to install power storage systems.

Codes and Standards | Jan 3, 2022

New York City bans new gas hookups

Applies to gas stoves, boilers, and heaters in new buildings and buildings that undergo gut renovations.

Codes and Standards | Jan 3, 2022

New engineering guide on fire safety for very tall buildings released

Topics include emergency egress, fire resistance, building envelope, suppression, detection, alarms, and smoke control.

Codes and Standards | Dec 22, 2021

Updated ASCE 7-22 standard includes first-ever criteria for tornado-resistant design

New document provides up-to-date, coordinated loading provisions for general structural design.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021