flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

GSA adopts SITES land development and management rating system

Codes and Standards

GSA adopts SITES land development and management rating system

Federal agency will use for properties with and without buildings.


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | April 25, 2016
GSA adopts SITES land development and management rating system

Built on a industrial brownfield, the Perot Museum of Nature and Science in Dallas is a SITES project. Photo: Joe Mabel/Wikimedia Commons.

The U.S. General Services Administration (GSA) has adopted the SITES rating system for its capital construction program. 

Green Business Certification Inc.’s SITES is a program for sustainable land development and management and is used by landscape architects, engineers, architects, developers, and policymakers to align land development with innovative sustainable design. SITES certification is for development projects located on sites with or without buildings including national parks, corporate campuses, streetscapes, homes, and more.

GSA is one of the largest and most diversified public real estate organizations in the world with a portfolio of 376.9 million rentable square feet in 8,721 active assets, and more than 144,000 acres of land, including ports of entry and historical properties. The GSA determined that incorporating SITES into the program offers a highly effective and efficient way to ensure environmental performance to meet federal goals on various capital project types.

The rating system provides a metrics-based approach to important concepts like ecosystem services and green infrastructure. The GSA’s decision is incorporated in the 2016 version of Facilities Standards for the Public Buildings Service (P-100), which establishes design standards and criteria for new buildings, infrastructural projects, major and minor alternations, and work in historic structures for the Public Buildings Service (PBS) of the GSA. This document contains both policy and technical criteria used in the programming, design, and documentation of GSA buildings and facilities.

Related Stories

| May 31, 2012

ANSI approves Green Building Initiative’s design standard

The Green Building Initiative (GBI), a Portland, Ore. nonprofit organization, has had its new consensus-based standard for the design, construction, and operations of environmentally friendly buildings approved by the American National Standards Institute (ANSI).

| May 31, 2012

USGBC testing Minnesota buildings to see if they are living up to LEED standards

The Minnesota chapter of the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) has teamed up with EnergyPrint, a St. Paul, Minn. energy consulting firm, to study the energy and water use of more than 150 buildings in the state that have LEED certification.

| May 29, 2012

Reconstruction Awards Entry Information

Download a PDF of the Entry Information at the bottom of this page.

| May 25, 2012

Major retail chains welcome LEED Volume option

Large national chains such as Starbucks, Marriott, Verizon, and Kohl’s are welcoming the LEED Volume Program that enables them to batch certify similar projects.

| May 25, 2012

Alaska’s okay of gravel aggregate with naturally occurring asbestos opens up development

Some long-delayed projects in the Upper Kobuk region of Alaska may now move forward thanks to legislation that allows construction in areas that have naturally occurring asbestos.

| May 25, 2012

Las Vegas building codes may thwart innovative shipping container development

A developer wants to build a commercial development out of steel shipping containers in Las Vegas, but city codes would have to be altered or the project would have to obtain waivers for it to receive the city’s go-ahead.

| May 25, 2012

Collapse of Brooklyn building that killed worker blamed on improperly braced frame

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration cited SP&K Construction with 11 safety violations, for which it could face more than $77,000 in fines.

| May 25, 2012

Study: Safety inspections don’t hurt the bottom line

A new study suggests that random safety inspections by regulators help reduce injury claims without hurting profits.

| May 24, 2012

2012 Reconstruction Awards Entry Form

Download a PDF of the Entry Form at the bottom of this page.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021