The need to decrease energy usage and subsequent emissions from the building sector has been at the forefront of U.S. green movement. Not only has energy reduction been viewed as a step for improving the environment, it has financial benefits for companies and homeowners.
To address this, researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s (MIT) Concrete Sustainability Hub conducted a life-cycle assessment (LCA) study to evaluate and improve the environmental impact and study how the “dual use” aspect of concrete – its ability to offer a durable structure while providing thermal mass benefits for energy loads – affects the environmental footprint of the structure.
"Methods, Impacts, and Opportunities in the Concrete Building Life Cycle" provides a comprehensive analysis that advances three key areas relevant to the buildings LCA field: methodology, benchmarking, and impact-reduction opportunities. The study is a major development for construction-related life-cycle assessment because it thoroughly examines all phases of the complete life cycle of a building – from acquisition of materials to construction, the use of the building, and finally demolition and end of life.
“Most environmental assessments do not move beyond the construction phase and only provide a partial picture of the full impact a particular material can have on a building. This is short-sighted,” David Shepherd, director of sustainable development for the Portland Cement Association (PCA) said. “The heating, cooling, and general operations of buildings and homes in the United States accounts for approximately 70 percent of national energy consumption each year and an accurate LCA needs to include the operational phase.”
Concrete, essential for the construction of buildings and homes, has largely been chosen as a building material for its structural properties rather than its energy-saving properties. Although sustainable builders have known the thermal mass attributes of concrete significantly reduce heating and cooling needs, the energy consumption required to produce its key ingredient, cement, has raised questions about its environmental viability.
In its environmental assessment, MIT researchers found concrete homes produce lower greenhouse gas emissions than current best practice code – compliant wood-frame residences throughout a 60-year service life.
Concrete homes did have a higher embodied global warming potential (GWP) associated with the pre-use phase of LCA when raw materials are harvested and turned into construction materials, transported to the site, and assembled into the finished home. However, this phase accounts for only about 2 to 12%of the overall global warming potential for the life of the home. For the 60-year period of the study, houses constructed with insulated concrete forms have 5 to 8 percent lower GWP than current code compliant light frame wood houses, based on greater thermal mass and higher R-values. Researchers found similar results when evaluating multifamily residences.
Commercial office buildings built with a concrete structural frame produce slightly less greenhouse gas emissions over a 60-year service life than commercial structures built with steel frames, based on the results of the comprehensive MIT assessment.
MIT researchers then evaluated strategies to lower a concrete building’s carbon footprint and overall environmental impact. A major advancement was the incorporation of a cost-impact analysis to determine whether or not a given environmental reduction strategy made economic sense. Among the strategies evaluated, the two that reduced embodied emissions – increased fly ash and reducing the thickness of concrete walls from a 6-inch to a 4-inch concrete core – were found to be both economical and effective ways to reduce emissions. BD+C
Related Stories
| Nov 17, 2013
How to spend your first 15 minutes with a prospect
Every business development person has been there. You’ve finally earned a few minutes to impress a prospect that you’ve been pursuing. This is your opportunity to shine. What do you say?
| Nov 17, 2013
Meet up with the BD+C team at Greenbuild. Drinks are on us!
To all our friends in the AEC industry, you are cordially invited to join the BD+C team at several fun events during the Greenbuild show this week. No RSVP required. Just show up and enjoy.
| Nov 15, 2013
Halls of ivy keep getting greener and greener
Academic institutions have been testing the limits of energy-conserving technologies, devising new ways to pay for sustainability extras, and extending sustainability to the whole campus.
| Nov 15, 2013
Pedia-Pod: A state-of-the-art pediatric building module
This demonstration pediatric treatment building module is “kid-friendly,” offering a unique and cheerful environment where a child can feel most comfortable.
| Nov 15, 2013
Metal makes its mark on interior spaces
Beyond its long-standing role as a preferred material for a building’s structure and roof, metal is making its mark on interior spaces as well.
| Nov 14, 2013
Fan of Frank Lloyd Wright? Here's your chance to run his architecture school
The Frank Lloyd Wright School of Architecture has launched a search for a new director. Deadline for applications is January 6, 2014.
| Nov 13, 2013
Government work keeps green AEC firms busy
With the economy picking up, many stalled government contracts are reaching completion and earning their green credentials.
| Nov 13, 2013
First look: Renzo Piano's addition to Louis Kahn's Kimbell Art Museum [slideshow]
The $135 million, 101,130-sf colonnaded pavilion by the famed architect opens later this month.
| Nov 11, 2013
4 trends driving the recovering commercial construction sector
Jones Lang LaSalle research reveals a four-point “new look” for the post-recession construction industry.
| Nov 8, 2013
Oversized healthcare: How did we get here and how do we right-size?
Healthcare facilities, especially our nation's hospitals, have steadily become larger over the past couple of decades. The growth has occurred despite stabilization, and in some markets, a decline in inpatient utilization.