flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Green initiative may scuttle high-rise projects in Berkeley, California, critics charge

Green initiative may scuttle high-rise projects in Berkeley, California, critics charge

Measure would mandate LEED Platinum on new high-rise construction


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | June 4, 2014
View of Berkeley and Bay from Claremont Canyon. Photo: Urban via Wikimedia Commo
View of Berkeley and Bay from Claremont Canyon. Photo: Urban via Wikimedia Commons

Volunteers in Berkeley, Calif., are collecting signatures for the “Green Downtown & Public Commons Initiative,” a controversial measure that critics charge would halt some development in the city. The initiative has higher green standards and less flexible design guidelines—factors that developers say could stop two major projects, a proposed 180-foot high hotel and a 17-story apartment tower.

The initiative would mandate that developers planning a project taller than 60 feet use the “Green Pathways” provision of the Downtown Area Plan. This rule—currently optional—says that a developer can provide a higher level of community benefits in exchange for a fast-track approval process. Under Green Pathways, developers have to make structures LEED Platinum rather than LEED Gold; build more parking; include spaces for bicycles, electric cars and the handicapped; pay prevailing wages to construction and hotel workers; and make sure that half of a project’s construction workers are Berkeley residents.

The financial proposition for a high-rise hotel in Berkeley is fragile, according to a representative of the proposed hotel, and the new initiative would require additional setbacks and restrictions that would make it impossible to have enough rooms on each floor to make the project viable. The initiative calls for a minimum 15-foot setback, but the hotel developer says the structure must have a 10-foot setback to have enough space per floor.

City Councilman Jesse Arreguín, who supports the measure, says it is not intended to stop development, but is a way of getting developers to contribute more benefits to the downtown area.

(http://www.berkeleyside.com/2014/05/14/would-new-green-initiative-kill-two-downtown-high-rises/comment-page-1/)

Related Stories

| Mar 19, 2014

Oklahoma City mandates safe rooms in new schools

The move will affect 24 districts that have schools inside Oklahoma City limits.

| Mar 19, 2014

Green building standards can help building become more storm-resistant

Structures built to green standards have added resilience to destructive storms because green buildings are often constructed with stronger, more sustainable materials than traditional buildings.

| Mar 19, 2014

Ohio Senate passes rule to require state agencies use ANSI standards rather than LEED

The resolution specifically mentions LEED v4, and calls for the U.S. Green Building Council to conform to ANSI. 

| Mar 19, 2014

Tucson ignores ADA, building code on city-owned property

The city has been operating a downtown dirt parking lot in violation of its own code and the federal law for years.

| Mar 19, 2014

Santa Monica, Calif., may offer LEED alternatives to help promote green construction

With developers in Santa Monica, Calif., looking for ways to build green more inexpensively, the city may consider alternatives to LEED such as Green Globes.

| Mar 18, 2014

Canadian wood industry pushes for ‘wood first’ legislation on mid-rise public projects

The wood lobby is pushing Canadian provinces to pass “wood first” legislation specifying wood framed structures as the default for mid-rise public works projects where warranted.

| Mar 13, 2014

USGBC hits back at Environmental Policy Alliance criticism

The Washington, D.C.-based Environmental Policy Alliance has launched a campaign to make the claim that LEED-certified buildings are less energy efficient than other buildings. In response, USGBC told its members: "Don’t be fooled, the Environmental Policy Alliance isn’t the 'EPA' you might think."

| Mar 13, 2014

North Carolina board recommends switch to six-year code update cycle

In a nine to six vote, the North Carolina State Building Code Council on March 11 approved moving the commercial building code (except for the electrical code) to a six-year cycle for updating instead of a three-year cycle.

| Mar 13, 2014

OSHA’s funding disclosure requirement for those offering silica rule comments draws ire

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration is requiring those who submit comments on the silica rule to disclose their funding sources for their scientific research to avoid conflict of interest.

| Mar 13, 2014

EPA publishes ‘best management practices’ rule on erosion, stormwater at construction sites

The Environmental Protection Agency published a new rule this month that will require the construction, housing, and utility sectors to carry out "best management practices" in order to prevent erosion and harmful stormwater discharges at construction sites.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021